On 10/29/2010 11:47 AM, Victor Gaultney wrote:
I received the following notice that related to the OFLib. I don't think
it's spam, as there's nothing about the SIL-specific account that
received it that has anything to do with the OFLib. One of you may want
to follow up with them.
That is a we
From: Ben Weiner
First ideas were a GNU head and a glyph for GPLv3 + font exception,
and perhaps a dinosaur(brontosaurus?) for MIT. But you will have
better suggestions :-)
Probably for GPL something based on this would be the best (SVGs are
provided): http://www.gnu.org/graphics/license-log
fontfree...@aol.com wrote:
>I highly recommend "libre/open fonts" instead to describe fonts which
>respect the 4 foundational software freedoms as defined by the FSF in
>the specific context of fonts: run the program for any purpose, study
>and adapt the program to your needs, distribute copi
Jon Phillips wrote:
> Just because of one person we should change urls? I don't agree
> whatsoever and its bad SEO tech and bad policy to move that easily.
I agree with Rejon here about the SEO part. Having "font" in the domain
name is a good boost for our position in search results.
> Good to h
Nicu Buculei wrote:
> Somebody pointed me in an IRC channel about this font not being free.
And I received the following answer:
"Thank you for your email. I might release them as OFL in the future,
but for now I would like to keep them free only for non-commercial use.
So I gu
Somebody pointed me in an IRC channel about this font not being free.
Original Message
Subject: the OPN Malatashito font and the Open Font Library
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:35:42 +0300
From: Nicu Buculei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Omar,
I am one
Jon Phillips wrote:
>
> I'm cc'ing Andy Fitzsimon and Jack Aboutboul to see who to connect with
> at RedHat for trying to get them dual-licensed at least with Open Font
> License and/or something less restrictive.
It was talked about this on Fedora lists [1], Mark Webbink is the person
driving t
