Title: FreeCode Signature
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 5 janvier 2009 13:15, Egil Möller a écrit :
Aggregation would be the case if you distribute an ODF and a TTF in
a zip file.
And this would be different from including the TFF in the same
ZIP-file
as
Le Lun 5 janvier 2009 13:15, Egil Möller a écrit :
Aggregation would be the case if you distribute an ODF and a TTF in
a zip file.
And this would be different from including the TFF in the same
ZIP-file
as the ODF-XML-files (Hint: ODF-files _are_ zip-files!)
It would be because the ODF
Title: FreeCode Signature
Aggregation would be the case if you distribute an ODF and a TTF in a zip file.
And this would be different from including the TFF in the same ZIP-file
as the ODF-XML-files (Hint: ODF-files _are_ zip-files!)
--
Konsulent, Fri Programvare / Free Software
Le mercredi 31 décembre 2008 à 11:37 +, Rob Myers a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dave Crossland d...@lab6.com wrote:
2008/12/30 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:47 PM, fontfree...@aol.com wrote:
The output from running a covered work is covered
2008/12/30 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:47 PM, fontfree...@aol.com wrote:
The output from running a covered work is covered by this License only if
the output, given its
content, constitutes a covered work.
Since you are embedding a font, which is itself a
On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Dave Crossland d...@lab6.com wrote:
2008/12/30 Jon Stanley jonstan...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:47 PM, fontfree...@aol.com wrote:
The output from running a covered work is covered by this License only if
the output, given its
content, constitutes
2008/12/31 Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org:
The document is not software
The GPL applies to 'works' not software, so this is irrelevant.
and is not a derivative of the font.
Derivative works in copyright law are not intuitive; a work made by
combining 2 works is a 'derivative' of both works. So
