Mary Kratz had some real good comments about the value of a separate
organization (eg: OSHCA) vs working groups in existing ones (eg: IMIA
and AMIA) a few years ago. I'm hoping she will chime in here with an update.
-Brian
Horst Herb a écrit :
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:41, Brian Bray wrote:
of a feather meeting initially without
first establishing self sustainabilitythe critical success factors
for successful OSHCA meetings so far have been:
- a local sponsor/champion eg. Mike McCoy and Colin Smith (Los Angles
and London)
- champion(s) and well connected organizing
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 03:47, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
to hold a meeting. In fact a satellite conference is preferable to
imbedding a meeting in Medinfo because of the cost of registration. A
low risk strategy is to find a willing host that can provide the space
to meet and ideally food services
totally agree about the eggs
Tim.Churches wrote:
Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
Tim,
Sorry didn't mean to dampen enthusiasm and imply that a satellite
conference in 2007 was impossible to pull offwhat I meant was that
in general you need operating capital to be able to pick where
You should co-ordinate this with the IMIA working group on open source.
http://www.chirad.info/imiaoswg/
-Brian
Horst Herb a écrit :
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 03:47, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
to hold a meeting. In fact a satellite conference is preferable to
imbedding a meeting in Medinfo because
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:41, Brian Bray wrote:
You should co-ordinate this with the IMIA working group on open source.
http://www.chirad.info/imiaoswg/
Will do. Wasn't even aware they existed.
Any point in having both OSHCA and IMIA OS WG as separate entities?
Should we aim for a joint
for successful OSHCA meetings so far have been:
- a local sponsor/champion eg. Mike McCoy and Colin Smith (Los Angles
and London)
- champion(s) and well connected organizing committee in OSCHA
Anyone have contacts/ideas for potential sponsor/champions in Brisbane?
To what can we credit
