On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:08:49 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
> I can't build this branch anymore, something related to compiling
> CCTaskGroovy. I think I need to merge or rebase to the latest version of
> master. Which is preferred, merge or rebase?
Merge, please.
-
PR:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:40 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
>> This PR adds code to ensure that KeyCodeCombinations match KeyEvents as
>> expected by more accurately mapping from a Mac key code to a Java key code
>> based on the user’s active keyboard layout (the existing code assumes a US
>> QWERTY
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:40 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
>> This PR adds code to ensure that KeyCodeCombinations match KeyEvents as
>> expected by more accurately mapping from a Mac key code to a Java key code
>> based on the user’s active keyboard layout (the existing code assumes a US
>> QWERTY
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:40 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
>> This PR adds code to ensure that KeyCodeCombinations match KeyEvents as
>> expected by more accurately mapping from a Mac key code to a Java key code
>> based on the user’s active keyboard layout (the existing code assumes a US
>> QWERTY
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 20:18:33 GMT, Martin Fox wrote:
>> @beldenfox Can you somehow add the test you talked about in a previous
>> comment? It always helps to have a test that fails before and succeeds after.
>> Let me know if you need help with this?
>
> @johanvos I've attached my test app to
On Wed, 6 Oct 2021 19:42:41 GMT, Johan Vos wrote:
>> @tomsontom I've added the Swing-style code as WIP PR #519. There are
>> comments in the PR that probably should be in the code but I wanted to
>> reduce the code diffs.
>>
>> PR #519 (and Swing) tend to get codes for punctuation keys wrong
On Tue, 25 May 2021 18:29:45 GMT, Martin Fox
wrote:
>> @beldenfox I did not say that the swing version is the way to go and in the
>> end its @kevinrushforth call what route should be taken - I just wanted to
>> show what my initial change would have been without saying it is better than
>>
On Tue, 25 May 2021 10:40:50 GMT, Tom Schindl wrote:
>> Is there some reason you would prefer a Swing-style implementation over the
>> approach I submitted in this PR? The Swing code breaks down if an
>> accelerator calls for the Option modifier alone or in addition to Command.
>> I'm still
On Mon, 24 May 2021 15:25:22 GMT, Martin Fox
wrote:
>> Martin Fox has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fixed whitespace error.
>
> Is there some reason you would prefer a Swing-style implementation over the
> approach I
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:40 GMT, Martin Fox
wrote:
>> This PR adds code to ensure that KeyCodeCombinations match KeyEvents as
>> expected by more accurately mapping from a Mac key code to a Java key code
>> based on the user’s active keyboard layout (the existing code assumes a US
>> QWERTY
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:40 GMT, Martin Fox
wrote:
>> This PR adds code to ensure that KeyCodeCombinations match KeyEvents as
>> expected by more accurately mapping from a Mac key code to a Java key code
>> based on the user’s active keyboard layout (the existing code assumes a US
>> QWERTY
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:40 GMT, Martin Fox
wrote:
>> This PR adds code to ensure that KeyCodeCombinations match KeyEvents as
>> expected by more accurately mapping from a Mac key code to a Java key code
>> based on the user’s active keyboard layout (the existing code assumes a US
>> QWERTY
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 17:41:40 GMT, Martin Fox
wrote:
>> This PR adds code to ensure that KeyCodeCombinations match KeyEvents as
>> expected by more accurately mapping from a Mac key code to a Java key code
>> based on the user’s active keyboard layout (the existing code assumes a US
>> QWERTY
> This PR adds code to ensure that KeyCodeCombinations match KeyEvents as
> expected by more accurately mapping from a Mac key code to a Java key code
> based on the user’s active keyboard layout (the existing code assumes a US
> QWERTY layout). The new code first identifies a set of Mac keys
14 matches
Mail list logo
