Hi all,
I have one general question regarding OpenOCD scans.
What happens when we set some field.in_value = NULL, and in reality
there are some bits that re shifted out on the scan chain ? Are they
just ignored ? Does that pose the problem ?
To give a concrete example, in the mips_ejtag.c we
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have one general question regarding OpenOCD scans.
What happens when we set some field.in_value = NULL, and in reality
there are some bits that re shifted out on the scan chain ? Are they
just
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Øyvind Harboe oyvind.har...@zylin.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have one general question regarding OpenOCD scans.
What happens when we set some field.in_value = NULL, and in reality
/ drasko.draskovic at gmail.com
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote:
// Hi all,
// I have one general question regarding OpenOCD scans.
//
// What happens when we set some field.in_value = NULL, and in reality
// there are some bits that re shifted out on the
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Laurent Gauch laurent.ga...@amontec.com wrote:
/ drasko.draskovic at gmail.com
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote:
// Hi all,
// I have one general question regarding OpenOCD scans.
//
// What happens when we set some
Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Laurent Gauch laurent.ga...@amontec.com wrote:
/ drasko.draskovic at gmail.com
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote:
// Hi all,
// I have one general question regarding OpenOCD scans.
//
// What
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Laurent Gauch laurent.ga...@amontec.com wrote:
Whoops, sorry...
Without reading in SPrAcc bit (fields[0].in_value = NULL) I can obtain
up to : 182.220215s (1.938 KiB/s).
However, when I read it in (fields[0].in_value = spracc_in) I get :
downloaded 361540
Last GIT has configure file corrupted.
; at line 14208 - 14245 - 14315 - 14348 - 14698 - 14726
do you need patch ?
Regards,
Laurent
http://www.amontec.com
http://www.amontec.com/jtagkey.shtml
Amontec JTAGkey-2 : low-cost High-Speed USB JTAG cable interface
/ The EZ-USB gives access to USB but not to the ULINK interface. Right ?
/
The ULINK consists of the EZ-USB microcontroller, an SRAM, an EEPROM and
level shifters. There's even a schematic floating around the net:
http://www.mikrocontroller.net/attachment/51828/ULink.pdf
Keil is just using the
Laurent Gauch wrote:
Last GIT has configure file corrupted.
; at line 14208 - 14245 - 14315 - 14348 - 14698 - 14726
do you need patch ?
If you send a patch you are contributing more efficiently. You never
have to ask if a change should be sent as a patch, just send the
patch directly. :)
If
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Laurent Gauch wrote:
Last GIT has configure file corrupted.
; at line 14208 - 14245 - 14315 - 14348 - 14698 - 14726
do you need patch ?
If you send a patch you are contributing more efficiently. You never
have to ask if a
Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
If you send a patch yourself you increase the chances that the
change is included sooner.
I did not look, but I had an impression from e-mail that Laurent
thought that the file needs revert (being correct in previous
revisions).
If correct version is already
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Peter Stuge peter at stuge.se
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development wrote:
/ Laurent Gauch wrote:
// Last GIT has configure file corrupted.
// ; at line 14208 - 14245 - 14315 - 14348 - 14698 - 14726
//
// do you need patch ?
//
// If you
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Laurent Gauch laurent.ga...@amontec.com wrote:
We cannot patch this file, since the 'configure' is generated at compilation
:-)!
Well, it's generated from autotools (during bootstrap), so patch can
be sent to these...
BR,
Drasko
Laurent Gauch wrote:
So, ULINK hardware is only used as board platform :-)
So, you have your own protocol.
I hope you have your own USB VID/PID too.
Why should he? The hardware comes with a valid VID/PID combination -
since he only loads a different firmware into the RAM of the ULINK, I do
Try:
make distclean
sh bootstrap
./configure --enable-maintainer-mode
make
if that doesn't work, upgrade various autoconf packages, etc.
--
Øyvind Harboe
Can Zylin Consulting help on your project?
US toll free 1-866-980-3434 / International +47 51 87 40 27
Is Schematics of ULINK available?
Does it support SWD?
I can check if it's suitable for Versaloon's USB_TO_XXX protocol.
2011/4/8 Michael Schwingen rincew...@discworld.dascon.de
Laurent Gauch wrote:
So, ULINK hardware is only used as board platform :-)
So, you have your own protocol.
I
simon qian wrote:
Is Schematics of ULINK available?
http://www.mikrocontroller.net/attachment/51828/ULink.pdf
I can check if it's suitable for Versaloon's USB_TO_XXX protocol.
That's a brilliant idea!
//Peter
___
Openocd-development mailing list
hi!
i do not understand how this code (from target.c) works.
i'm working with a dsp568013.
each memory address holds 16 bits.
when i run mdh someaddress count with count over 16, openocd's
output does not match what i would expect. the first 16 words are
displayed in a line with address
It seems that ULINK doesn't support SWD, because TMS pin is output only.
But if use another pin for SWDIO input, ULINK can support TMS.
Simply connect TMS pin to another input pin eg. J-TRAP.
2011/4/8 Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se
simon qian wrote:
Is Schematics of ULINK available?
another question: i haven't been able to find a way to make load_image
and verify_image work with my target, any clues?
to implement resume for example, i added .resume=my_resume_function
to my target. is there something similar for load_image?
i got this part, had to add .write_buffer and
On 05/04/2011, at 4:08 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
On 05/04/2011, at 3:53 PM, Mathias K. wrote:
I was able to link openocd against libjim. There is only a problem to link
jimsh against libjim.
Strange.
Perhaps you can send me libjim.a and I'll take a look.
For the benefit of the list,
22 matches
Mail list logo
