Hello,
I'm having trouble using openpkg build on FreeBSD and am consistently
getting an I/O error. I am not sure how to identify the problem further.
I installed the following openpkg packages by hand (built locally):
bash-2.05a# pwd
/openpkg/RPM/PKG
bash-2.05a# /openpkg/bin/openpkg rpm -qa
I see most packages are compiled in with the fsl library and this is
configured to log to a local file in /prefix/var/package but I don't
follow the fsl documentation well enough to make the logging just go to
syslog.
I tried configuring /openpkg/etc/fsl/fsl.postfix as follows but this did
Hello all,
Inspite of reading the documentation several times I am still confused
about the different openpkg user/groups which can be configured when
building the initial openpkg bootstrap package (and their usage
thereafter).
By mistake I installed a 2.3 over the top of a running /openpkg
Hello all,
I am getting the following problems with emacs when trying to build on
openpkg-2.3. The build platform is an up to date Whitebox Linux (a RedHat
Enterprise 3.0 clone). I know this is not a supported configuration but
this is the only issue I have come across since starting using
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Henri - I got the exact same results with GCC 3.3.6 (from CURRENT). It
seems that the compile works fine, but the spec file is wrong. Just
before it crashes these commands are executed:
+ mv
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon J Mudd wrote:
( cd obj
%{l_make} %{l_mflags} install \
INSTALL=%{l_shtool} install -c \
DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
) || exit $?
# cleanup installation tree
mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{l_prefix}/lib/lib
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
well gcc 3.4.4 is working perfectly on AIX 5.2 PASE but this problem
at install time prevent me to have a RPM ;(
Reading specs from
/QOpenSys/usr/local/gcc-3.4.4/bin/../lib/gcc/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.4.4/specs
Configured with: ../configure
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon, I got past this by doing the following:
1) Uninstalling binutils (OpenPKG RPM versions)
I don't have the binutils rpm installed (AIX rpm).
2) Compiling using --define=with_binutils no switch
Did not help me.
But you are building 3.3.6 not
Although this is slightly off topic I am able to build gcc-3.4.4 on AIX
5.1 using the following script after untarring the tar ball and cd'ing
into the gcc-3.4.4 directory.
#!/usr/bin/bash
#
# script to build gcc-3.4.4
mkdir obj
cd obj
# use a proper value later
export
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[snip]
All I did was grab the CVS version of gcc.spec and rebuild the rpm -
openpkg rpm -bb gcc.spec --define=l_cc gcc --define=with_binutils no.
Understood. I assume that you did NOT have the openpkg binutils rpm
installed? If it is installed, inspite
Hello All,
As different people are looking at the OpenPKG port to AIX I've added a
Wiki link on the OpenPKG Wiki site. This should allow us all to provide
our input in a common place and it should help us to see the current
issues which still need to be resolved.
Regards,
Simon
Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005, Simon J Mudd wrote:
As different people are looking at the OpenPKG port to AIX I've added a
Wiki link on the OpenPKG Wiki site. This should allow us all to provide
our input in a common place and it should help us
Christian Reiber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you have any automated scripts for building everything?
Simon, I have a Perl script which creates a Makefile from RPMs and
SRPMs if it is of any help. It is prerelease however which means it
fits my needs but have never tried it on other
Hello All,
Doug sent me some feedback on the building he has been doing so I have
updated the wiki. Thanks. This should help everyone see the status of
OpenPKG on 2.4/CURRENT more easily.
I have also put the OpenPKG BINARY rpms that _I_ have built on my own
ftp/web site in case they are of
Hi,
I've just noticed something I don't really understand. Perhaps someone can
explain what is happening.
I had some problems trying to compile lftp and now bind.
Both gave me errors:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
compiler cannot create executables
Just to follow up my own post a little.
Simon J Mudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So removing libiconv makes gcc work. I am now compiling bind9 again
it it looks like it will complete.
It does.
Can someone explain why installing libiconv makes gcc fail, and does
this mean that the AIX port
Hello All,
Doug seems to have solved this, though I don't understand how.
I tried to test the method to build and install libiconv and get it to
work with gcc.
Steps taken:
...
- build and install OpenPKG libiconv rpm
- uninstall OpenPKG gcc (as it stops working once libiconv is installed)
Simon J Mudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If it DOES work then you use openpkg itself to install/build the rpms
you need. It is generally easier to use get openpkg-tools built as
this package automates the whole process of satisfy dependencies,
download, build install.
Just as a follow
Michael van Elst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:47:48AM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
1. Install openpkg
2. install openpkg-tools dependencies (make, gcc, perl)
3. install openpkg-tools
One interesting part of the first openpkg-tool (which only consisted
When doing a fresh install of openpkg from current I notice the following
installing openpkg binary openpkg-20050920-20050920.powerpc-aix5.1-ope.sh
OpenPKG CURRENT Binary Bootstrap Package, version 20050920
Built for prefix /openpkg on target platform powerpc-aix5.1
++ hooking OpenPKG instance
Simon J Mudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is not serious but probably worth tidying up. I'll try the
same thing with the 2.4.2 package to see if the behaviour is
identical.
On openpkg-2.4.2-2.4.2 the behaviour is similar but not
identical. There is no error about files left when
Stijn De Weirdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi all,
i just installed openpkg on scientific linux 3, which is a clone of rhel3.
so i used
sh openpkg-2.4.0-2.4.0.ix86-rhel3-openpkg.sh --prefix=/opt/openpkg
to install openpkg.
the result was:
OpenPKG 2.4-RELEASE Binary Bootstrap Package,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:17:48PM +0200, Steve Weinreich wrote:
--On Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2005 15:54 +0200 Stijn De Weirdt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i just installed openpkg on scientific linux 3, which is a clone of rhel3.
so i used
sh
Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005, Simon J Mudd wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:17:48PM +0200, Steve Weinreich wrote:
--On Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2005 15:54 +0200 Stijn De Weirdt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all,
i just installed openpkg
Ralf S. Engelschall [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005, Andreas Schmidt wrote:
i have three questions about the new registration-requirements:
does this mean, that i have to register every single instance of ofbiz
if i don't want to set up a mirror of the openpkg-ftp-server
I appeared to have openpkg working with the openpkg-registry package with
openpkg-2.4.2-2.4.2.
I have just upgraded to openpkg-2.5.0-2.5.0 and want to upgrade my installed
packages.
I have therefore done a
/openpkg/bin/openpkg build -Ua build.sh
The output is as follows (trunated)
#
Hi,
I have now correctly got my system to register and it is checking
daily for any updates.
I notice that on http://registry.openpkg.org/?page=association the
active instance is marked with a date of the 30-11-2005.
Is this date supposed to show the last access to the OpenPKG system or
is it
It looks like the rrdtool does not check that tcl is available and if not will
fail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] COS4 bin]# uname -a
Linux ams03.wl0.org 2.6.9-22.0.1.EL #1 Thu Oct 27 12:26:11 CDT 2005 i686 athlon
i386 GNU/Linux
The build error is shown below:
gsize.o librrd_th_la-rrd_create.o
Hi Doug,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug Summers) writes:
I've had no problems building OpenPKG 2.5.x on AIX 5.1 with any
maintenance level, but not on AIX 5.2 (tried with ML3 ML5 machines):
We have recently obtained a new server which will run 5.3. I think
that AIX 5.3 (5.2?) is not supported on
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't been pursuing 5.3 lately as our dept. changed and I know
longer have full access to a 5.3 machine. This will change in 1Q06 as
I will be upgrading all of my 5.1 machines to 5.3. I just got 2.5.1 to
compile on 5.2 and will focusing on openssh,
Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did there is a chance we see one day OpenPKG AIX binaries available
for download and use ?
While this WAS work in progress and I no longer have access to the
machine I was building on some binary RPMs I built can be found at:
ftp://ftp.WL0.org/openpkg
Torsten Homeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
[...]
Thus I am suggesting the following patch (only minimally tested).
[...]
+{ ! ps -elf|grep postfix/m[a]ster /dev/null 21 \
+ /kolab/libexec/postfix/master
Simon J Mudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think I have found the problem and solution.
[...]
I installed glibc-devel.i386 and then tested the test program that
failed before. This now builds without problems. I am retrying to
build OpenPKG gcc again and hope that this time it will work
I tried to follow the instructions given and have found a problem.
Not sure how to diagnose it.
Running RHEL4 (actually centos-release-4-3.2) on i386.
I've installed the new openpkg rpm, removed openpkg-registry and rebuilt
openpkg-tools. I also reregistered my email.
# openpkg rpm -qa | grep
Michael van Elst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 09:26:59AM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
Regarding the MTA issue it might be nice if there were a system-mta
package which does nothing more than provide symbolic links from
$prefix/sbin/sendmail to the system equivalent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael van Elst) writes:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 03:33:33PM +0200, Simon J Mudd wrote:
Upgraded postfix to openpkg-import. Thanks.
This breaks 'openpkg build -Ua' as shown below:
openpkg-import defaults to an empty package that does not
provide anything
Bill Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006, Thomas Lotterer wrote:
On Sunday, 2. July 2006 at 3:44 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like openpkg-import is not included in the 2.20060628 branch.
The package was omitted by intention. The openpkg-import package is
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SNIP
OK - working on AIX 5.1 w/32-bit kernel.
Hi Doug,
Do you have any details of the current state of your efforts with the
OpenPKG AIX port?
i.e. How you are using it and what special steps need to be taken to
get it to work (in your environment)?
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can put it in but I'm not quite done with my documentation. Give me
the link so I can update it later.
http://wiki.openpkg.org/?BuildingOpenPKGunderAIX
I'm happy with you completely removing the older build stuff I put on there
as it is out of date.
I'm trying to build python on AIX 5.3 using the OpenPKG 2.5 rpms.
The python build fails with shtool complaining:
/openpkg/2.5/RPM/TMP/rpm-tmp.17996: /openpkg/2.5/lib/openpkg/shtool: /bin/sh:
bad interpreter: Arg list too long
/bin/sh in AIX is linked to /usr/bin/ksh, the native AIX korn shell.
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After many headaches I've finally got OpenPKG-STABLE built on AIX
4.3.3 through 5.3. I will be updating the OpenPKG Wiki pages sometime
in the following weeks.
As I just completed the AIX 4.3.3 builds the binary list is very small
(building gcc as we
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After I finish my toolset upgrades I'll try building python.
I'll try and rebuild python on OpenPKG-STABLE or CURRENT, but looking
at the rpmdiff[1] output between openpkg-2.5.0-2.5.0.src.rpm and
openpkg-20061030-20061030.src.rpm I can't see anything that
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trying to get this version updated (currently using the 10.18.2006
release). I'm getting this error during the build of tar, which is
exactly what I was getting with coreutils 6.3 (fixed in the new 6.4
release):
Simon J Mudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After I finish my toolset upgrades I'll try building python.
I'll try and rebuild python on OpenPKG-STABLE or CURRENT, but looking
at the rpmdiff[1] output between openpkg-2.5.0-2.5.0.src.rpm and
openpkg
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had no luck building python but I'm going to keep trying. I remember
running into this problem awhile back but don't remember if a fix was
created.
Well it should be easy enough tomorrow for me to hack shtool to use
bash as the shell and at least see
To followup my own post:
Simon J Mudd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well it should be easy enough tomorrow for me to hack shtool to use
bash as the shell and at least see if that allows the build to
complete.
Changing the installed openpkg shtool shell manually to
$prefix/lib/openpkg/bash does
Doug Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to setup what I thought was an easy email system. I have two
offline computers, and I want to simply send SMTP traffic back and forth. I
have tried postfix, sendmail, and exim. I am missing something very
fundamental because I get the same
Doug Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doug Summers wrote:
SNIP
OK - I got it a clean build to work, using these IBM rpm's:
gcc-4.0.0-1
gcc-c++-4.0.0-1
libgcc-4.0.0-1
libstdc++-4.0.0-1
libstdc++-devel-4.0.0-1
m4-1.4.1-1
make-3.80-1
Obviously something's happening during an
48 matches
Mail list logo
