On Mon, Sep 21, 2009, Jeff Johnson wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 3:41 PM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
No, not worth the effort as even in the days of GNU libtool it is an
endless effort when it comes to true cross-platform solutions like
OpenPKG. And beside faster updates in case of security
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009, Stefan Palm wrote:
1) After playing around a little with OpenPKG I'm wondering about this
projects status. The last (official) release is dated from 2007-12-27,
quite a lot of pages at openpkg.org are outdated and the mailings list
seem to be
Thank you for the explanation, Ralf.
And although I do understand your argumentation I don't agree with your
conclusion regarding the shared libraries. Anyway, just my two cents.
Stefan
__
OpenPKG
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:14 AM, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
(3) OpenPKG is a multi-instance solution.
Bingo. That engineering reason I understand well (from wrestling
with --root and rpmdb solutions in RPM almost daily).
73 de Jeff
