1.) I am trying IPMP group for performance,
Outbound load spreading i am not worried of , as i
have myself seen it in action and is quite efficient,
But does Inbound Load Spreading work with IPMP and
will it have same effect.
Unfortunately, no; IPMP can only do outbound load balancing;
Yes, I tried ifconfig -a plumb. It didn't change
anything; I still
just see the two lo0 devices (IPv4 IPv6)
While Juergen migh be correct with `ifconfig -a`, this syntax is new and
unknown to me. As far as I know, plumb argument always needs a NIC instance.
So please try:
ifconfig e1000g0
I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate PulseAudio as the sound
server in Solaris?
I have been searching around forums and mailing lists and still didn't find
anything about this... but it's becoming kind of the standard in the big linux
distros (and GNOME) and it might be useful
I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate
PulseAudio as the sound server in Solaris?
I have been searching around forums and mailing lists
and still didn't find anything about this... but it's
becoming kind of the standard in the big linux
distros (and GNOME) and it might be
SABRI ALI
MEDIAPOST SERVICES
DSI - Ressources
Administrateur système
9 boulevard du Général de GAULLE
92126 Montrouge CEDEX
E.mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel : 0146124526 Fax : 0146124550
P Pensons ENVIRONNEMENT: n'imprimer que si nécessaire ...
Ceri Davies writes:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:53:27PM -0800, Chandan Maddanna wrote:
Guys to be more clear, look at the diagram below, and tell me how to get a
single load spread 2 Gbps link with IP Multi Pathing on Solaris 10 ?
Note : Please see Image Below .
img
What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP
to the dtlogin. That doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not a
fix, it's a workarround imho.
This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions.
Anyone know what changed here?
This message
What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP
to the dtlogin. That
doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not a fix, it's a
workarround imho.
This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions.
Anyone know what changed here?
Security,
UNIX admin writes:
Yes, I tried ifconfig -a plumb. It didn't change
anything; I still
just see the two lo0 devices (IPv4 IPv6)
While Juergen migh be correct with `ifconfig -a`, this syntax is new and
unknown to me. As far as I know, plumb argument always needs a NIC instance.
ifconfig
chandan maddanna writes:
Now as james said, i am thinking if there are three interfaces in the ipmp
group, i will use address on one and other two i will mark, 0.0.0.0 and make
them up. So it does efficient outbound load spreading, in Round Robin
Type.
Note that the load spreading is
UNIX admin wrote:
This is piece of cake stuff. Normally all of this is set up during
the install, if you chose not to do so, then it's all in all 45
seconds to enter the interace names in /etc/hosts and create the
corresponding /etc/hosname.e1000g[0-n] files. You might be
experiencing a
What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP
to the dtlogin. Tha
t
doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not a fix, it's a
workarround imho.
This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions.
Anyone know what changed here?
Security,
ifconfig -a plumb is an intentional, though undocumented, special
case. Ordinarily, the -a option means read SIOCGIFCONF to
determine what interfaces IP knows about, and operate on them.
The code to find all interfaces is as simple as:
#include libdevinfo.h
#include stdio.h
static int
I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate
PulseAudio as the sound server in Solaris?
I have been searching around forums and mailing lists
and still didn't find anything about this... but it's
becoming kind of the standard in the big linux
distros (and GNOME) and it might be
On Dec 10, 2007 5:55 PM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Likewise, perhaps you are asking at a wrong place. I suggest to contact the
developers of PulseAudio to ask them if they have any plans on porting this
software to Solaris.
Perhaps you might be able to convince them that Solaris
On Dec 10, 2007 3:55 PM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate
PulseAudio as the sound server in Solaris?
I suggest to contact the developers of PulseAudio to ask them if they
have any plans on porting this software to Solaris.
That's not
On Dec 10, 2007 10:26 AM, Dick Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 3:55 PM, UNIX admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate
PulseAudio as the sound server in Solaris?
I suggest to contact the developers of PulseAudio to ask them if they
Anxiously awaiting build 79 to resolve my Gnome problems
Any word on the delay of 78 and if it will delay 79?
Thanks
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Patrick Blaas wrote:
What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP
to the dtlogin. That doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not
a fix, it's a workarround imho.
This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions.
Anyone know what changed
Patrick:
Note that for GNOME/GStreamer to work best with OSS, you need to rebuild
the SUNWgnome-audio* and SUNWgnome-media* packages after installing the
OSS packages. To do this you should use the CBE, which you can get
from the OpenSolaris website:
On Dec 10, 2007 7:17 PM, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick:
Note that for GNOME/GStreamer to work best with OSS, you need to rebuild
the SUNWgnome-audio* and SUNWgnome-media* packages after installing the
OSS packages. To do this you should use the CBE, which you can get
from
Patrick:
This is a regression then, in my opinion. Prior to SXCE77 I never had to
rebuild anything.
It should work fine without needing to rebuild anything. However, if
you don't rebuild SUNWgnome-audio and SUNWgnome-media then you are using
the SADA shim. This shim allows programs that use
On 12/10/07, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick:
This is a regression then, in my opinion. Prior to SXCE77 I never had to
rebuild anything.
[snip]
Hi Brian :)
As far as I can tell I am using the same OSS modules 4.00, but I am not sure
about the minor release version so I'll
On 12/10/07, Patrick Ale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/10/07, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick:
This is a regression then, in my opinion. Prior to SXCE77 I never had
to
rebuild anything.
[snip]
Hi Brian :)
And again, hi :P
So, checking out the repository
If something else can get the job done well, I'm not averse to using it. But it
appears at moment I have no way to access or otherwise using punchin.
Furthermore, does it work with the existing Cisco based VPN server deployments
that are already in use in many of Sun's customers' shops?
--I'm
Here's the November issue of the OpenSolaris Community Newsletter:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/advocacy/newsletter/nov/
Thanks to all for your contributions. If you have any content you would
like to submit for December's newsletter, please send them to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Linda
John Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If something else can get the job done well, I'm not averse to using it. But
it appears at moment I have no way to access or otherwise using punchin.
Furthermore, does it work with the existing Cisco based VPN server
deployments that are already in use
First of all Thanks to all, i am getting so much valuable Information here.
secondly, as of now, I am thinking That on the transmittion end, where i am
concerned with outbound load spreading, i will use IPMP group.
Now as james said, i am thinking if there are three interfaces in the ipmp
group,
Hello!
I don't read this alias normally, but I was pointed to it by folks. I'm also
using JIVE to read this one instead of my normal e-mail.
Punchin started its life as a test-tool for Solaris IPsec and IKE during the S9
bringup of IKE(v1). Punchin is different than other remote-access
Also awaiting 78 for a Wireless Network fix...
:)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You could take a look at Sun Trunking 1.3, but Sun Trunking 1.3, like any
server trunking software, load balances the outgoing traffic, not the incoming
packets. Trunking 1.3 software relies on the link partner (switch or server) to
load balance the incoming packets.
1. Download the binary.
Victor wrote:
I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate PulseAudio as the sound
server in Solaris?
I have been searching around forums and mailing lists and still didn't find
anything about this... but it's becoming kind of the standard in the big
linux distros (and GNOME) and
He mentioned that the feature set would be significantly reduced since
OSS (when integrated) won't nearly provide as much capability as Alsa does on
Linux, but confirmed it does work fine on Solaris already.
what capabilities from alsa are missing in oss?
nacho
Hello!
I don't read this alias normally, but I was pointed
to it by folks. I'm also using JIVE to read this one
instead of my normal e-mail.
Punchin started its life as a test-tool for Solaris
IPsec and IKE during the S9 bringup of IKE(v1).
Punchin is different than other remote-access
Try not to quote back the whole post next time...
So would this solution be compatible with the
existing Cisco solutions that many companies have?
Nope, and I thought the protocol explanation would've made that point obvious.
BTW, that complete incompatibility with anything else out there was
There is no dedicated ON list, so sending it to opensolaris-discuss.
Am I the only one who feels uncomfortable when ONNV notification
comes from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Nothing personal against
the owner of that mail address. Just think that at this point there is
no way for someone outside of Sun to
36 matches
Mail list logo
