Is this possible?
I try the normal way like I do the installation under Solaris 10 U5 but it wont
work in OpenSolaris 052008 and I cant find anything if this is possible or not.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
Hi Kyle,
given that what happens looks ever-so-slightly different each time, a
hardware glitch could be possible; to exclude this, would you happen to
know whether these panics occurred before build 78 as well ? If they occur
if you use the b77 hsfs module on your post-b78 system ? Does the
hey, guys, Happy Birthday. :) We became three on Saturday. Time flies,
eh? A very special thank you to everyone for putting in so much time and
effort to make OpenSolaris a success. We may have had a challenging
year, but we came through on a nice upswing. I'm certainly looking
forward to year
Kendall Bennett writes:
The big difference between 4Front and us, is that we have no vested
commercial interest in the project anymore. Hence a dual licensing option
under GPL/BSD type licenses is not something we need to do. We actually have
always done that with our SDK code over the
蓖申藺___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hey Guys, its the Noob again. lol
As you all know I'm an XP guy, attapting to OpenSolairs, so far its been great,
a couple hickups that you'veset me in the correct directions, but i still am
loving it.
A Think which I've got used to on XP is the extended Desktop funtion.
I am using a laptop,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Robert William Fuller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kyle,
given that what happens looks ever-so-slightly different each time, a
hardware glitch could be possible; to exclude this, would you happen to
know whether these panics occurred before build 78 as well ?
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Juergen Keil wrote:
Robert William Fuller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kyle,
given that what happens looks ever-so-slightly different each time, a
hardware glitch could be possible; to exclude this, would you happen to
know whether these panics occurred before
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 05:35:23AM -0700, Matt Parnell wrote:
Hey Guys, its the Noob again. lol
As you all know I'm an XP guy, attapting to OpenSolairs, so far its been
great, a couple hickups that you'veset me in the correct directions, but i
still am loving it.
A Think which I've got
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Matt Parnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Guys, its the Noob again. lol
As you all know I'm an XP guy, attapting to OpenSolairs, so far its been
great, a couple hickups that you'veset me in the correct directions, but i
still am loving it.
A Think which
Hello,
I want to install opensolaris for the first time. I downloaded the
'os200805.iso' file from opensolaris.org but there is a problem when starting
the live cd .
Booting ' opensolaris 2008.05'
.
.
.
[b]Error 36 : Incorrect gunzip CRC cheksum[/b]
see : the attached picture for more detail
Looks like a duff CD image - try downloading it again.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kyle,
given that what happens looks ever-so-slightly different each time, a
hardware glitch could be possible; to exclude this, would you happen to
know whether these panics occurred before build 78 as well ? If they occur
if you use the b77 hsfs module on
Robert William Fuller wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kyle,
given that what happens looks ever-so-slightly different each time, a
hardware glitch could be possible; to exclude this, would you happen to
know whether these panics occurred before build 78 as well ? If they occur
Frank Hofmann wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Juergen Keil wrote:
IIRC a bug like ``kmem_free(NULL, size)'' somewhere in the kernel can have
the
effect that a subsequent ``kmem_alloc(size, KM_SLEEP)'' somewhere else in
the
kernel will return with a NULL pointer! (Assuming you run release
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 11:32:47 -0300 Ignacio Marambio Catán [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
you need xinerama, check
Work on Xinerama has stopped in favor of Xrandr. Xinerama's APIs have
never been properly specified, and it's static - you can't add or
remove screens or change their resolution on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There have been two changes to HSFS in b78 as far as I remember (the
readahead speed improvements and the hardlink support), I wouldn't
associate either with e.g. screwed vfs linkage (as two of these
stacktraces show), but then, stranger regressions have occurred.
Juergen Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kmem_alloc(0, flag) always returns NULL. kmem_free(NULL, 0)
is legal.
That's manpage - consider it a spec ...
Well, it says kmem_free with a ptr == NULL and size == 0 is legal;
but what about ptr == NULL and size 0?
We had the
Robert William Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Kyle,
given that what happens looks ever-so-slightly different each time, a
hardware glitch could be possible; to exclude this, would you happen to
know whether these panics occurred before build 78 as well ?
This is to announce availability of NexentaCore 2.0 Alpha1 - Debian
Native OpenSolaris environment and platform. (unstable Hardy branch)
NexentaCore 2.0 Alpha1 Release Highlights:
--
* 3392 packages ported over just two weeks of Hardy Hackathon
Hi all,
The following is the link where we all can get ample info on Crossbow,
what its all about, its architecture , getting started docs, and so many
others who contributed to the project.
Sunay Tripathi ( Distinguished Engineer) of Sun is the architect of this
wonderful project.
Frank Hofmann wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Juergen Keil wrote:
For that reason I did suggest to Kyle to try to reproduce this hsfs mount
panic with kmem heap checking enabled.
Add the following line to /etc/system, reboot, retry to reproduce the hsfs
mount panic:
set
Hmm, in usr/src/uts/common/fs/hsfs/hsfs_vfsops.c function hs_mountfs(),
whenever we use one of the first three |goto cleanup|, the local variables
|svp| and |jvp| are uninitialized. That should corrupt the kernel heap
when we kmem_free() with an unitialized stack lock pointer in the
cleanup
I filed a bug at http://bugs.opensolaris.org/;
Bug-ID is not yet known.
Fix is obvious:
diff --git a/usr/src/uts/common/fs/hsfs/hsfs_vfsops.c
b/usr/src/uts/common/fs/hsfs/hsfs_vfsops.c
--- a/usr/src/uts/common/fs/hsfs/hsfs_vfsops.c
+++ b/usr/src/uts/common/fs/hsfs/hsfs_vfsops.c
@@ -596,8
Juergen Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, in usr/src/uts/common/fs/hsfs/hsfs_vfsops.c function hs_mountfs(),
whenever we use one of the first three |goto cleanup|, the local variables
|svp| and |jvp| are uninitialized. That should corrupt the kernel heap
when we kmem_free() with an
How quickly will we see Firefox 3 in the repository? How come Netbeans 6.1
instead of 6.0.1 is not in the repository yet?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
If I were a betting man I would imagine it would show up on the Mozilla
site before the repo. I think a Sun team in Beijing compiles them.
Usually takes a day or two from my experience.
I would keep an eye on:
http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/
I would even go as far
I can't seem to get a get on the internet with open solaris 2008 U5
running under Parallels. ANy hints?
Thanx
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
looks the image is corrupted. Try to download it again, and verify the check
sum before you burn the cd.
Good luck!
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
29 matches
Mail list logo
