On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Michael Sierchio wrote:
Daniel Sands wrote:
What's the problem here? The output is exactly as it should be for this
program.
Your lack of reading skills? The point is that the previous
poster asserted that dc was a front end to bc. I believe that I
conclusively
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. According to Theo and Beck (both OpenBSD folks), the current /dev/crypto
engine doesn't work. It seems to be a adaptation of Theo's cryptodev demo,
and should be thrown away.
My opinion: I trust Theo and those guys to know what they talk about,
The last time I checked, dc is only a front-end for bc. It seems odd to me
that dc can work correctly if bc is broken...
Wrong way around. bc is a front end for dc. bc -c shows you what
is sent to dc. I think that the problem may be to do with lines being
truncated when sent from bc to dc,
Hello, I'm hoping I got the right place, And am not annoying too many
people.
I just reinstalled Solaris 8 07/01 on my Sparc-20 (Dual 61Mhz cpu's, 2x
18G disks, 128M of ram). It is a fresh install with the latest patches
applied.
I grab the OpenSSL 0.9.6c source and did my usual ./config ; make
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
dc and bc are linked by some way...
Yes. Unlink dc and bc won't work. ;-)
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Michael Sierchio wrote:
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
dc and bc are linked by some way...
Yes. Unlink dc and bc won't work. ;-)
;)
I read J.P. King's email, and it's more clear now.
ot
I should try to learn dc, as I'm more comfortable with RPN that
traditional algebraic.
/ot
I'm not sure why you need to yank out source when it's just as easy to
link with libcrypto and make sure you only use the specific
algorithms. In such a case, one should avoid using things like
EVP_get_cipherbyname() since that requires that all compiled
algorithms be linked in.
I
The last time I checked, dc is only a front-end for bc. It seems odd to me
that dc can work correctly if bc is broken...
Wrong way around. bc is a front end for dc. bc -c shows you what
is sent to dc. I think that the problem may be to do with lines being
truncated when sent from bc
Hello,
After generating CSR with openssl 0.9.8-dev, 0.9.7-dev or 0.9.6
'asn1dump' says that:
261 023: INTEGER 65537
: }
: }
: }
266 A00: [0]
: Error: Object has zero length.
in the file:
/crypto/md2/Makefile
Change the line:
DIR = md
To:
DIR = md2
Otherwise it won't compile correctly in Solaris 8.
Works fine in Linux broken of course :)
Jeff
__
OpenSSL Project
First of all thank you and congratulations for your work My patch is
quite evident, in fact I cannot understand how it could have passed
unnoticed ?! In several places in the installacion Makefile, there is
a missing ; between fi and done It is not needed if they are in
different lines, but when
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
After generating CSR with openssl 0.9.8-dev, 0.9.7-dev or 0.9.6
'asn1dump' says that:
261 023: INTEGER 65537
: }
: }
: }
266 A00: [0]
:
Hi,
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 08:12, John Viega wrote:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 02:48:46PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
wrote:
I'm not sure why you need to yank out source when it's just as easy to
link with libcrypto and make sure you only use the specific
algorithms. In such a
Hi Fellas,
Went back this evening to re-examine the socket and OpenSSL code I
had written. I was curious to see if adding a ::sleep() call in
between the accept() and SSL_accept() calls made a difference.
None whatsoever. ::sleep()ing right before the SSL_accept() makes no
difference to NS62.
Hello Roger,
Sorry I did not respond sooner. I did the early SSL support in mozilla
but have not touch this code in over a year or so. I think that the
folks that you want to talk to are Javier Delgadillo and Terry Hayes
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]. The now own the security
15 matches
Mail list logo
