Re: [PATCH 0/4] Initial POWER8 support

2013-11-27 Thread Marcelo Cerri
Hi Andy, Any comments on that? Regards, Marcelo On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 04:36:01PM -0200, Marcelo Cerri wrote: This patch series adds the initial support for POWER8 new cryptographic instructions. Different versions of the ppc_vcipher_AES_[en|de]crypt were tested and no significant

[openssl.org #3182] Bug in OpenSSL 1.0.1e 586 assembly optimized AES_cbc_encrypt

2013-11-27 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
On Tue Nov 26 22:30:34 2013, cosborn...@hotmail.com wrote: I've noticed what appears to be a bug in the 586 assembly-optimized AES_cbc_encrypt function of OpenSSL 1.0.1e, (compiled on Windows) when encrypting data that is 1 block in length, but not an integral multiple of the block size. Well

[openssl.org #3183] SSL_set_SSL_CTX() should apply more settings from the SSL_CTX being switched to

2013-11-27 Thread Kaspar Brand via RT
The implementation of SSL_set_SSL_CTX is fairly slim right now: --- snip --- SSL_CTX *SSL_set_SSL_CTX(SSL *ssl, SSL_CTX* ctx) { if (ssl-ctx == ctx) return ssl-ctx; #ifndef OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT if (ctx == NULL) ctx = ssl-initial_ctx; #endif

RE: [openssl.org #3182] Bug in OpenSSL 1.0.1e 586 assembly optimized AES_cbc_encrypt

2013-11-27 Thread Charles Osborne via RT
Subject: [openssl.org 3182] Bug in OpenSSL 1.0.1e 586 assembly optimized AES_cbc_encrypt From: r...@openssl.org To: cosborn...@hotmail.com CC: openssl-dev@openssl.org Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:33:08 +0100 On Tue Nov 26 22:30:34 2013, cosborn...@hotmail.com wrote: I've noticed what