On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 02:13:58PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
Seems like I'm getting a lot of repeated emails from this list. But anyway,
I don't see how using the 32x32=32 instructions can save any steps. If you
use it with 32x16 data you are still going to get a 48 bit result and lose
the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Zidlicky
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MiNT] M68020 bn_asm
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:43:56AM -0800, Howard Chu wrote
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Zidlicky
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 03:43:12PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
I just checked the 68060 user manual, you're right. That means the plain
68000 code is needed on the 68060. (What a
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MiNT] M68020 bn_asm
From: Howard Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hyc From the overwhelming lack
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard Zidlicky
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 9:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MiNT] M68020 bn_asm
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:43:56AM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
Here is a more thorough assembly
From: Howard Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hyc From the overwhelming lack of response I guess no one on this
hyc list cares about Motorola 68k implementations.
A less melodramatic interpretation is that there is a lack of time to
take care of everything at once.
For the record, I'm interested. Not
