Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 07:20:22AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote: Side note: I sent on 1 Dec 2002 at 21:42:47 a mail (uninteresting: basically a question I answered myself in next mail) that got lost. Not received back from Request Tracker, no delivery bounce, and not reached URL:http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=201. It was id [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I have checked the logfiles at serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de (which is both the mail and webserver currently hosting RT2) and I could not find any indication that this message ever reached serv01. That would leave the openssl.org mail exchanger... Best regards, Lutz -- Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/ BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
On Monday, December 2, 2002 at 10:55:26 AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote: Tried OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta4 and it seems to work. Both make test and make install passes. Great! Thanks. I'll confirm with 0.9.7 when it's released, but please feel free to close the bug. Confirmation for the just released 0.9.6h (not engine): Everything is OK, test and install pass. Thanks again! :-) Side note: I sent on 1 Dec 2002 at 21:42:47 a mail (uninteresting: basically a question I answered myself in next mail) that got lost. Not received back from Request Tracker, no delivery bounce, and not reached URL:http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=201. It was id [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Bye!Alain. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
On December 3, 2002 03:09 am, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 08:35:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote: Hmm. According to http://www.perldoc.com/perl5.6/pod/perlpod.html there only exist =head1 and =head2, so the complaint is correct :-) Geoff??? Hmm, bollocks. I can't confess to having studied the perlpod documentation on this - I merely wondered if I could get away with a [snip] you are the doc-god, what do you think we should do? I'm obviously the first to want a third level of header nesting, but I may not be the last ... With respect to the link I cited above, the =head directive only supports level 1 and level 2. If we intend to maintain compatibility with standard perlpod, and I think we do :-), there is no level 3 and that is it. Thus the manual page needs restructuring. Well I decided to do a little fishing ... this is apparently not a limitation of groff/man (which is what counts, after all) but a limitation of the pod2man implementation in version 5.6 of perl. Version 5.8 gives *four* levels of nesting; http://www.perldoc.com/perl5.8.0/pod/perlpod.html I can go and cripple the engine.pod documentation if absolutely necessary, but it simply seems a somewhat shortsighted solution (even if alliterative :-). IIRC there was some discussion a while back about bundled implementations of pod2man or something like that? Could we simply use a 5.8-compatible bundled implementation if the host system's version is too old? Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ The bastards have beaten off rationalism for now, but haven't eliminated our capacity for reason - to do that they'd have to make us forget how to both think and fear at the same time. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:08:25 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt I can go and cripple the engine.pod documentation if absolutely necessary, rt but it simply seems a somewhat shortsighted solution (even if rt alliterative :-). IIRC there was some discussion a while back about rt bundled implementations of pod2man or something like that? Could we rt simply use a 5.8-compatible bundled implementation if the host system's rt version is too old? I've no problem with bundling a newer version. After all, we have something bundled in right now! -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 4 Dec 2002 18:08:25 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt I can go and cripple the engine.pod documentation if absolutely necessary, rt but it simply seems a somewhat shortsighted solution (even if rt alliterative :-). IIRC there was some discussion a while back about rt bundled implementations of pod2man or something like that? Could we rt simply use a 5.8-compatible bundled implementation if the host system's rt version is too old? I've no problem with bundling a newer version. After all, we have something bundled in right now! -- Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/ for more info. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 08:35:43PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote: On December 2, 2002 05:53 am, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:26AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote: There is just an alert at some point: | installing man3/engine.3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 34 | of engine.pod: head3 ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod | directive in paragraph 39 of engine.pod: head3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 59 | of engine.pod: head3 ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod | directive in paragraph 62 of engine.pod: head3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 69 | of engine.pod: head3 ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod | directive in paragraph 73 of engine.pod: head3 But the installation continues, and man engine is there after. Hmm. According to http://www.perldoc.com/perl5.6/pod/perlpod.html there only exist =head1 and =head2, so the complaint is correct :-) Geoff??? Hmm, bollocks. I can't confess to having studied the perlpod documentation on this - I merely wondered if I could get away with a third level of header nesting and it just worked on my installation (ie. I got no warnings/errors and the resulting man-page rendered fine). Is this a limitation in (some versions of) 'pod2man' or is it a safety measure because of limitations in (some versions of) 'man'? It seems a shame to have to ditch something that works if it's a limitation in the version of the conversion tool being used. Lutz, you are the doc-god, what do you think we should do? I'm obviously the first to want a third level of header nesting, but I may not be the last ... With respect to the link I cited above, the =head directive only supports level 1 and level 2. If we intend to maintain compatibility with standard perlpod, and I think we do :-), there is no level 3 and that is it. Thus the manual page needs restructuring. Best regards, Lutz -- Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/ BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
Hello again Lutz,
On Friday, November 29, 2002 at 1:20:25 PM +0100, Lutz Jänicke via RT wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
- with 0.9.6g:
installing man3/SSL_write.3
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_write.pod
make: *** [install_docs] Error 29
Hmm. Seems your version of pod2man has some problems, that were not
detected. util/pod2mantest has been improved since the release of
0.9.6g. The version of pod2man.pl shipping with OpenSSL should
definitely work.
Tried OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta4 and it seems to work. Both make test and
make install passes. Great! Thanks. I'll confirm with 0.9.7 when it's
released, but please feel free to close the bug.
Installing manpages gives:
| /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod
| pod2man does not work properly ('BasicTest' failed). Looking for another pod2man ...
| /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod
| /usr/bin/pod2man does not work properly ('BasicTest' failed). Looking for another
|pod2man ...
| No working pod2man found. Consider installing a new version.
| As a workaround, we'll use a bundled old copy of pod2man.pl.
| installing man1/CA.pl.1
| installing man1/asn1parse.1
[and so on]
There is just an alert at some point:
| installing man3/engine.3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 34 of engine.pod:
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 39 of engine.pod:
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 59 of engine.pod:
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 62 of engine.pod:
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 69 of engine.pod:
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 73 of engine.pod:
|head3
But the installation continues, and man engine is there after.
Bye!Alain.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:26AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote: There is just an alert at some point: | installing man3/engine.3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 34 of engine.pod: head3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 39 of engine.pod: head3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 59 of engine.pod: head3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 62 of engine.pod: head3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 69 of engine.pod: head3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 73 of engine.pod: head3 But the installation continues, and man engine is there after. Hmm. According to http://www.perldoc.com/perl5.6/pod/perlpod.html there only exist =head1 and =head2, so the complaint is correct :-) Geoff??? Best regards, Lutz -- Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/ BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
On December 2, 2002 05:53 am, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:55:26AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote: There is just an alert at some point: | installing man3/engine.3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 34 | of engine.pod: head3 ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod | directive in paragraph 39 of engine.pod: head3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 59 | of engine.pod: head3 ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod | directive in paragraph 62 of engine.pod: head3 | ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 69 | of engine.pod: head3 ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod | directive in paragraph 73 of engine.pod: head3 But the installation continues, and man engine is there after. Hmm. According to http://www.perldoc.com/perl5.6/pod/perlpod.html there only exist =head1 and =head2, so the complaint is correct :-) Geoff??? Hmm, bollocks. I can't confess to having studied the perlpod documentation on this - I merely wondered if I could get away with a third level of header nesting and it just worked on my installation (ie. I got no warnings/errors and the resulting man-page rendered fine). Is this a limitation in (some versions of) 'pod2man' or is it a safety measure because of limitations in (some versions of) 'man'? It seems a shame to have to ditch something that works if it's a limitation in the version of the conversion tool being used. Lutz, you are the doc-god, what do you think we should do? I'm obviously the first to want a third level of header nesting, but I may not be the last ... Cheers, Geoff -- Geoff Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geoffthorpe.net/ The bastards have beaten off rationalism for now, but haven't eliminated our capacity for reason - to do that they'd have to make us forget how to both think and fear at the same time. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
Hello Lutz, On Thursday, November 28, 2002 at 8:37:36 PM +0100, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: [jaenicke - Fri Nov 15 22:52:05 2002]: The test_req script actually performs a ../apps/openssl req -config ../apps/openssl.cnf testreq.pem \ -inform p -outform d f.d Can you run this manually? It fails with unknown option testreq.pem message. But if I replace argument testreq.pem by an input redirection testreq.pem it succeeds with a 326 bytes binary output f.d file. It succeeds today, but was perhaps failing before: Situation has changed. Any updates? Well, I'm sorry, don't know why: make test works now. With all versions previously failing: 0.9.6d, e and g. And the exact same build commands as before. So it obviously was something broken on my system... The only important change I made was cleanly installing a working 0.9.6c some weeks ago. Appart of that, I didn't add nor upgrade anything in build tools (gcc, make and friends), nor any system libraries (well no: I upgraded libiconv 1.8, Ncurses 5.3, and libbz2 1.0.2). Note that with this install of 0.9.6c I successfully experimented playing with CA.pl to create a CA then a server certificate. This was failing before, with test failing 0.9.6d, with errors I didn't note (I thought I'd make later a complete report but lacked time), unless I removed nearly everything from openssl.cnf as nsComment, subjectKeyIdentifier, authorityKeyIdentifier, basicConstraints, keyUsage, etc... From my poor memory, errors were something as unknown object type. Today it's working, with test succeeding 0.9.6d. I wanted to test with 0.9.6e/g, but if they now pass make and make test, they fail make install (?!?) while installing manpages: - with 0.9.6e: [snip many same errors] installing man1/verify.1 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in verify.pod installing man1/version.1 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in version.pod installing man1/x509.1 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in x509.pod make: *** [install_docs] Error 29 - with 0.9.6g: [snip many same errors] installing man3/SSL_state_string.3 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_state_string.pod installing man3/SSL_want.3 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_want.pod installing man3/SSL_write.3 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_write.pod make: *** [install_docs] Error 29 In both cases, I end without openssl installed. Summary: - 0.9.6c always tested and installed OK. - before 0.9.6d/e/g tested BAD. - now 0.9.6d tests and installs OK. - now 0.9.6e/g test OK but install BAD. So I now upgraded my system to 0.9.6d, the latest working version. Hope this makes sense... Thanks again, bye! Alain. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote: - with 0.9.6g: [snip many same errors] installing man3/SSL_state_string.3 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_state_string.pod installing man3/SSL_want.3 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_want.pod installing man3/SSL_write.3 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_write.pod make: *** [install_docs] Error 29 Hmm. Seems your version of pod2man has some problems, that were not detected. util/pod2mantest has been improved since the release of 0.9.6g. The version of pod2man.pl shipping with OpenSSL should definitely work. Best regards, Lutz -- Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/ BTU Cottbus, Allgemeine Elektrotechnik Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
[jaenicke - Fri Nov 15 22:52:05 2002]: The test_req script actually performs a ../apps/openssl req -config ../apps/openssl.cnf testreq.pem -inform p -outform d f.d Can you run this manually? Any updates? Lutz __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sat Oct 12 11:42:13 2002]: Hello Richard, On Friday, October 11, 2002 at 10:15:30 AM +0200, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.39, gcc 2.7.2.1, libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.6e build a test in make test fails: | testing req conversions | p - d | make[1]: *** [test_req] Error 1 | make: *** [tests] Error 2 Is this still an issue? Yes, this test always fails with OpenSSL since version 0.9.6d, and until the latest 0.9.6g. The problem is that I don't even know what I could do to dig this... So I thank you for your interest. The test_req script actually performs a ../apps/openssl req -config ../apps/openssl.cnf testreq.pem -inform p -outform d f.d Can you run this manually? Lutz __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
The only thing I can think of is that your disk is full, or test/testreq.pem is corrupted in some way. [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Aug 7 13:15:20 2002]: Hello, On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.39, gcc 2.7.2.1, libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.6e build a test in make test fails: | testing req conversions | p - d | make[1]: *** [test_req] Error 1 | make: *** [tests] Error 2 I'm not a build process expert (really not), so I don't know what to do next as test... I tried O.9.6d: got exactly the same problem. Output of make report comes attached. Please CC me, I'm not subscribed. Alain. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test
Hello Richard, On Thursday, August 15, 2002 at 12:36:52 PM +0200, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.39, gcc 2.7.2.1, libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.6e build a test in make test fails: | testing req conversions | p - d | make[1]: *** [test_req] Error 1 | make: *** [tests] Error 2 The only thing I can think of is that your disk is full Well no, don't think so: I have more than 80 Mo free on /tmp when I start make test. or test/testreq.pem is corrupted in some way. It's coming from a fresh tar.gz just uncompressed witout problems. BTW I get the same error with 0.9.6g, but not with older 0.9.6c. So same error with d, e, and g. Alain. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
