Larry, Thanks for your response. However we will be using OpenSSL only.
Appreciate if any of you have detailed steps to successfully build OpenSSL
libraries for Vxworks.
Thanks in advance,
Srinivas
Hi,
I'm considering porting OpenSSL to a RTOS, and would like to hear about
people's experience with such a task.
- How portable exactly is OpenSSL? Are all OS and platform specific
definitions and wrappers(?) placed in a single place or is this going to
require changing the code all-over
Hi Eitan,
- How portable exactly is OpenSSL? Are all OS and platform specific
definitions and wrappers(?) placed in a single place or is this going to
require changing the code all-over?
Basically OpenSSL is portable to any RTOS and the complexity depends on the
compiler and the options that
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 10:44:08AM +0200, Bar, Eitan wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering porting OpenSSL to a RTOS, and would like to hear about
people's experience with such a task.
- How portable exactly is OpenSSL? Are all OS and platform specific
definitions and wrappers(?) placed
P. George wrote:
i am trying to get the following little hello-world ssl sample to run
on win32 using winsock2:
http://www.uweb.ucsb.edu/~jramrus/stuff/NetProgs/ssl_server.c
it compiles and runs fine on my os x machine. however, when i take
the same code and drag it over to windows and add a
this issue has been resolved... or at least i've pinpointed the
problem. there's an inconsistency between how my win32 0.9.7d and my
os x 0.9.7d deal with timeouts.
on os x, timeout doesn't begin timing inactivity until i've started to
send data. until i begin sending, it waits, blocking at
i am trying to get the following little hello-world ssl sample to run
on win32 using winsock2:
http://www.uweb.ucsb.edu/~jramrus/stuff/NetProgs/ssl_server.c
it compiles and runs fine on my os x machine. however, when i take the
same code and drag it over to windows and add a call to
P. George wrote:
i am trying to get the following little hello-world ssl sample to run on
win32 using winsock2:
http://www.uweb.ucsb.edu/~jramrus/stuff/NetProgs/ssl_server.c
it compiles and runs fine on my os x machine. however, when i take the
same code and drag it over to windows and add a
Why is MatrixSSL so *very much* smaller than OpenSSL? Which features account for the
extra 700KB or whatever? I'm probably not using them
- Martin Kochanski.
At 15:56 21/07/04 -0700, J Harper wrote:
Gary,
MatrixSSL might be a good alternative, it's designed to be easily portable
and I
I have been working on porting OpenSSL to the THEOS
Operating System. The C compiler is ANSI C compliant and "mostly" ISO C99
compliant. However, it is not as feature rich as GCC. . My
main problem is with the function pointer callbacks that accept
parameters. I'm finding t
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:00:15 -0600, Gary Walters
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
garwal I have been working on porting OpenSSL to the THEOS Operating
garwal System. The C compiler is ANSI C compliant and mostly ISO
garwal C99 compliant. However, it is not as feature rich
Thus spake Gary Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been working on porting OpenSSL to the THEOS Operating System.
The C compiler is ANSI C compliant and mostly ISO C99 compliant.
However, it is not as feature rich as GCC. . My main problem is with the
function pointer callbacks that accept
.
garwal I have been working on porting OpenSSL to the THEOS Operating
garwal System. The C compiler is ANSI C compliant and mostly ISO
garwal C99 compliant. However, it is not as feature rich as GCC. My
garwal main problem is with the function pointer callbacks that
garwal accept parameters. I'm
I need the crypto portion.
I have found the SSLEay 0.8.1 port to PalmOS. Is this the port you are
talking about?
Yes, probably.
What are the problems you faced? What are limitations of
PalmOS you faced?
IIRC we had two problems. Each program was limited to 64kB and JMP was
limited to +-
.
..Ram
From: Arne Ansper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Porting OpenSSL to Palm OS
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:09:22 +0200 (FLE Standard Time)
I need OpenSSL on Palm OS. I have searched the archives and have found
some
references
Hello,
I need OpenSSL on Palm OS. I have searched the archives and have found some
references to people attempting to port to Palm OS.
Has anyone ported it? What state is it in? And what problems did anyone face
porting it to Palm?
..Ram
I need OpenSSL on Palm OS. I have searched the archives and have found some
references to people attempting to port to Palm OS.
Has anyone ported it? What state is it in? And what problems did anyone face
porting it to Palm?
What parts do you need? Porting the complete OpenSSL is quite
I need OpenSSL on Palm OS. I have searched the archives and have found some
references to people attempting to port to Palm OS.
Has anyone ported it? What state is it in? And what problems did anyone
face porting it to Palm?
The folks who wrote TopGun SSH ported enough of SSLEAY to Palm
I just fixed this.
thx
-H
- Original Message -
From: Richard Koenning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:18 AM
Subject: Re: problem when porting openssl to netware
At 14:37 18.10.2002 -0400, you wrote:
[...]
The test programs run well
hi folks,
I'm not sure if this is the right place to post my problem. I'm trying to
port the openssl to NetWare and managed to build the lbirary and toolkits.
The test programs run well on NetWare server. But when I run openssl on
NetWare server to connect to a ssl server running on win2k, (
Hi,
I am in the process of porting the OpenSSL libs to compile using the Watcom C/C++
compiler and the WASM assembler. I will be supporting OS/2 Win32 perhaps 32-bit DOS
if there is demand for it. I will also be producing a version of OpenSSL that will
compile on OS/2 using the EMX+GCC
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/15/00
at 10:05 AM, Jeffrey Altman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If you are going to be supporint OS/2, I recommend that you start by
incorporating the OS/2 patches that Dirk Ohme wrote for the IBM compiler.
I've been using them on OS/2 for some time now and would be
Sounds great. Do you have a url for the patches as I did not notice
them in the distribution.
they aren't in the distribution. I have a copy. I will send you a
URL to get them privately.
BTW the Watcom compiler is going opensource:
http://www.openwatcom.org
Considering that IBM is
If you are going to be supporint OS/2, I recommend that you start by
incorporating the OS/2 patches that Dirk Ohme wrote for the IBM
compiler. I've been using them on OS/2 for some time now and would be
interested in working with you on the OS/2 support.
Hi,
I am in the process of
As such, I would like to isolate all of the
extraneous Unix include files and IO. I
would also like to pare down as much of the
code as possible to shrink the object size.
Look in the mail archives (use www.openssl.org for directions) for a
thread about "Small Footprint" a couple of weeks
25 matches
Mail list logo
