On 3/14/2012 12:27 PM, Bruce Stephens wrote:
open...@master.openssl.org (OpenSSL) writes:
[...]
o Preliminary FIPS capability for unvalidated 2.0 FIPS module.
I note that #2741 appears not to be resolved, so if you build on Windows
and use --with-fipsdir=... then that probably
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right answer.
is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI compatible with openssl-1.0.0 ?
Yes. In brief the versioning scheme introduced with 1.0.0 is:
Changes
On Thursday 15 March 2012 03:19:07 Ludwig Nussel wrote:
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right
answer. is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI compatible with
openssl-1.0.0 ?
Yes. In brief
William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net writes:
On 3/14/2012 12:27 PM, Bruce Stephens wrote:
open...@master.openssl.org (OpenSSL) writes:
[...]
o Preliminary FIPS capability for unvalidated 2.0 FIPS module.
I note that #2741 appears not to be resolved, so if you build on Windows
Hello,
Thank you very much for 1.0.1 release.
It builds and works perfect on OpenVMS Alpha and IA64 architectures - as long I
could test it.
Unfortunately, it is still not possible to build on VAX architecture, because
the [openssl.org #2653] [BUG] OpenSSL 1.0.1 OpenVMS issues on VAX is sill
Unfortunately, it is still not possible to build on VAX architecture,
because the [openssl.org #2653] [BUG] OpenSSL 1.0.1 OpenVMS issues
on VAX is sill not solved.
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev@openssl.org/msg29956.html
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
===
http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES.
The most significant changes are:
o TLS/DTLS heartbeat support.
o SCTP support.
o RFC 5705 TLS
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
===
http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES.
The most significant changes are:
o TLS/DTLS heartbeat
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
===
http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES.
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
===
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 19:36 +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
OpenSSL version
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:36:09 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
OpenSSL version
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:30:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
OpenSSL version 1.0.1 released
open...@master.openssl.org (OpenSSL) writes:
[...]
o Preliminary FIPS capability for unvalidated 2.0 FIPS module.
I note that #2741 appears not to be resolved, so if you build on Windows
and use --with-fipsdir=... then that probably won't work.
[...]
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Bruce Stephens wrote:
open...@master.openssl.org (OpenSSL) writes:
[...]
o Preliminary FIPS capability for unvalidated 2.0 FIPS module.
I note that #2741 appears not to be resolved, so if you build on Windows
and use --with-fipsdir=... then that probably
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 17:18:19 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:30:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:25:32 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 11:09:22 OpenSSL wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right answer.
is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI compatible with openssl-1.0.0 ?
Yes. In brief the versioning scheme introduced with 1.0.0 is:
Changes to last letter: security and
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:09:22 -0500, OpenSSL wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
We consider OpenSSL 1.0.1 to be the best version of OpenSSL
available and we strongly recommend that users of older versions
upgrade as soon as possible. OpenSSL 1.0.1 is available for
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Iain Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:09:22 -0500, OpenSSL wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
We consider OpenSSL 1.0.1 to be the best version of OpenSSL
available and we strongly recommend that users of older versions
upgrade as soon as
I've looked at that, and the modes part is quite integral to a number
of other algorithms. Supporting it being turned off is likely to be a
maintainance nightmare (especially since it will seldom blow up
considering most platforms today have a C compiler that supports long
long).
My conclusion
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 19:23:14 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i'm not looking for downstream workarounds here but rather the right
answer. is openssl-1.0.1 expected to be ABI compatible with
openssl-1.0.0 ?
Yes. In brief the versioning scheme
21 matches
Mail list logo
