Hello:
I have a source files that use openssl functionality. I want to make a
shared library to use this with Java. I did this following steps:
1º Compile sources:
gcc -fPIC -g -c -Wall -I/usr/local/java/include \
-I/usr/local/java/include/linux \
-I/usr/local/ssl/include \
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:12:15 +0400
Victor B. Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005.10.21 at 18:45:13 +0200, Steffen Pankratz wrote:
now i'm totally confused no shared libs for win32?!
is it a bug?
Not for win32. Just for MSVC build. Use mingw32 and you'll get shared
build with working
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Steffen Pankratz wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:12:15 +0400
Victor B. Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005.10.21 at 18:45:13 +0200, Steffen Pankratz wrote:
now i'm totally confused no shared libs for win32?!
is it a bug?
Not for win32. Just for MSVC build.
Hi,
I am fighting with a linking problem which says:
wcecompatex.lib(redir.obj) : error LNK2005: _fopen already defined in
coredll.lib(COREDLL.dll)
wcecompatex.lib(redir.obj) : error LNK2005: _fclose already defined in
coredll.lib(COREDLL.dll)
wcecompatex.lib(redir.obj) : error LNK2005: _fread
On 2005.10.26 at 13:16:02 +0200, Steffen Pankratz wrote:
Just use mingw32 for building openssl dlls.
why shouldn't it be possible to use MSVC to compile openssl (shared and with
dynamic engine support)?
are there any serious reasons?
I think that it is because nobody is interested in
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:35:52 +0200
Dr. Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Steffen Pankratz wrote:
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:12:15 +0400
Victor B. Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005.10.21 at 18:45:13 +0200, Steffen Pankratz wrote:
now i'm totally
Hi folks,
I'm having a little trouble with openssl-0.9.8 on Fedora Core 3. I
downloaded the source and installed with the following:
./config --prefix=/usr
make
make test
make install
Then, for good measure, I rebooted (init 6). I had thought that at
this point, I would be able to make calls
Does bin2bn() assumes all positive numbers?
That is, the most significant bit of 'bin' == 1 doesn't indicate a
negative value, right?
--
Ken Goldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 914-784-7646
__
OpenSSL Project
Greetings.
I'm having some problems with the latest debian version of stunnel. I
might be missing a library or two, but the weird is that it was working
well 'till some days ago.
It asks me something about DSO support routines. Are they in some
library I don't know? What's my mistake?
The
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Ken Goldman wrote:
Does bin2bn() assumes all positive numbers?
That is, the most significant bit of 'bin' == 1 doesn't indicate a
negative value, right?
Yes.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
OpenSSL project core developer and
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Steffen Pankratz wrote:
I don't if you read all the thread
right know i have to trick to get my engine compiled properly but i'm not
sure about it's working with the openssl program
because if I can't use 'shared', 'no-shared' is used and
OPENSSL_NO_DYNAMIC_ENGINE
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
I'll check to see if anything has changed/broken.
Urgle, the DSO code under Win32 in 0.9.8 seems to be broken. I'm
investigating.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. Email, S/MIME and PGP keys: see homepage
OpenSSL project core developer and
Hi,
I generated a key and cert using the Makefile available in the standard
FC4 installation (Apache 2 w/mod_ssl and openSSL), as per RH9s manual at:
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-9-Manual/custom-guide/s1-secureserver-generatingkey.html
(changing directories, as per FC4s
13 matches
Mail list logo
