In the past, I have had issues with tar files where the block size
wasn't specified, and the file was a multiple of 512 but not of 10240.
My solution was to pad out to a multiple of 10240.
On 30 April 2012 13:22, Dave Thompson dthomp...@prinpay.com wrote:
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On
...@gmail.com
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Date: 2012-04-30 04:33
Subject:Re: OpenSSL 1.0.1b released, invalid tar file!
Sent by:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
In the past, I have had issues with tar files where the block size
wasn't specified, and the file was a multiple of 512
On 4/27/2012 9:43 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 04/27/12 02:29 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Hmm never seen any error messages myself, using GNU tar 1.25.
The distribution tarballs are always created by doing:
make -f Makefile.org dist
from any source tree. As you can see from the files
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of jb-open...@wisemo.com
Sent: Thursday, 26 April, 2012 19:37
On 26-04-2012 15:05, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
... This archive under 7-Zip 9.20 (latest
stable) displays a There are no trailing zero-filled records
error dialog but then
Dr. David Kirkby wrote [2012-04-27 09:43+0200]:
[.]
See for
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/star/README.otherbugs
He has developed star
http://developer.berlios.de/projects/star
which he has said produces POSIX compliant tar files.
(berlios.de seems to be accessible again today.)
--steffen
On 04/27/12 02:29 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Hmm never seen any error messages myself, using GNU tar 1.25.
The distribution tarballs are always created by doing:
make -f Makefile.org dist
from any source tree. As you can see from the files this makes use of tar
and tardy. The tar version
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 04/27/12 02:29 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Hmm never seen any error messages myself, using GNU tar 1.25.
The distribution tarballs are always created by doing:
make -f Makefile.org dist
from any source tree. As you can see from the
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Hmm... the puzzle continues. The versions of tar and tardy match those on the
OpenSSL development machine and have tghe same default but those seem fine
with the version of tar on Solaris whereas those produced on my setup (Ubuntu
11.10) produce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.1b released
===
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
http://www.openssl.org/
The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of
version 1.0.1b of our open source
On 4/26/2012 5:10 AM, OpenSSL wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.1b released
===
Heads up warning: This archive under 7-Zip 9.20 (latest stable)
displays a There are no trailing zero-filled records error dialog but
-7711
yaber...@ca.ibm.com
Advisory IT Specialist
From: open...@master.openssl.org (OpenSSL)
To: openssl-annou...@master.openssl.org,
openssl-...@master.openssl.org, openssl-us...@master.openssl.org
Date: 2012-04-26 08:33
Subject:OpenSSL 1.0.1b released
Sent by:owner-openssl
On 26-04-2012 15:05, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
On 4/26/2012 5:10 AM, OpenSSL wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.1b released
===
Heads up warning: This archive under 7-Zip 9.20 (latest
stable) displays a There
(Adding some supplemental information I found after sending)
On 27-04-2012 01:36, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
On 26-04-2012 15:05, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
On 4/26/2012 5:10 AM, OpenSSL wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.1b released
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
This is not limited to 7-Zip, see also the post by Mr. Bergeron
of IBM.
I have looked closer at the tar.gz file (my download matches the
checksums and digital signature from Dr. Henson), and the file
is not valid according to the tar file
14 matches
Mail list logo
