[openssl-users] OpenSSL F2F

Sorry, we didn't think to put this out earlier... The OpenSSL dev team is having a face-to-face meeting this week in Berlin, co-located with LinuxCon. If you're in the area, feel free to stop by. In particular, on Tuesday from 16:50-17:40 - "Members of the openssl development team will be

Re: [openssl-users] calloc vs kssl_calloc

On 10/01/2016 03:32 PM, Geoffrey Coram wrote: > On 09/30/2016 09:29, "Salz, Rich" wrote: >>> Is there something more I should do on this issue? I recall the >> OpenSSL terms of use strongly discouraged people from the US from >> helping, due to US export restrictions. >> >>

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL and sourc'ing countries (was: calloc vs kssl_calloc)

On 01/10/2016 23:01, Jeffrey Walton wrote: Is there something more I should do on this issue? I recall the OpenSSL terms of use strongly discouraged people from the US from helping, due to US export restrictions. That's kinda outdated. However there are very many OpenSSL users (myself

Re: [openssl-users] calloc vs kssl_calloc

On 01/10/2016 23:18, Salz, Rich wrote: However there are very many OpenSSL users (myself included) who rely on the legal status of OpenSSL/SSLeay as having no US origin parts. If this has changed, it needs a big red banner at the top of the www.openssl.org, every affected source file with the

Re: [openssl-users] calloc vs kssl_calloc

> This fact was *not* published widely enough to be seen by everyone > concerned. It was certainly not published as widely as the fact that SSLeay > was created and maintained entirely outside the US, and that this was one of > its major attractions. > > Basically that internal checkin (which I