Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-30 Thread Erwann Abalea
Maybe we just didn’t. At least not with the command line tools. The CHANGES file lists a merge between « dh », « gendh », and « dhparam » in 2000, but no evolution since then. The oldest version I could find is 0.9.6, and there’s no command-line DH key generation. Cordialement, Erwann Abalea

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-30 Thread Michael Scott
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 30/06/16 16:54, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> Since X25519 is not the first "encrypt-only" algorithm in the > >> OpenSSL universe, how was requesting certificates handled for > >> such algorithms in the past? > > > > It

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-30 Thread Matt Caswell
On 30/06/16 16:54, Salz, Rich wrote: >> Since X25519 is not the first "encrypt-only" algorithm in the >> OpenSSL universe, how was requesting certificates handled for >> such algorithms in the past? > > It wasn't. > >> For example how would one request a DH certificate? > > You couldn't. >

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-30 Thread Salz, Rich
> Since X25519 is not the first "encrypt-only" algorithm in the > OpenSSL universe, how was requesting certificates handled for > such algorithms in the past? It wasn't. > For example how would one request a DH certificate? You couldn't. I don't recall anyone ever asking for such a thing on

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-30 Thread Jakob Bohm
Which brings back my generalized question from yesterday: Since X25519 is not the first "encrypt-only" algorithm in the OpenSSL universe, how was requesting certificates handled for such algorithms in the past? For example how would one request a DH certificate? Whatever was defined back then

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-30 Thread Michael Scott
Yes, I can certainly program my way out of the problem, but it would be nice if the command line tool allowed me a way to do it. Thanks! Mike On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Erwann Abalea wrote: > Ok, you’re talking about OpenSSL command line tool only, I missed

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-30 Thread Erwann Abalea
Ok, you’re talking about OpenSSL command line tool only, I missed that part. The solution should then be to modify apps/ca.c:certify() function to add an arg, and avoid the call to X509_REQ_verify when desired. Cordialement, Erwann Abalea Le 29 juin 2016 à 19:17, Michael Scott

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Abe Racioppo
tsets On 6/29/16, Abe Racioppo wrote: > 290620161352 > > On 6/29/16, Salz, Rich wrote: >> >>> But surely the openssl command line tool should provide a mechanism for >>> allowing an X25519-based certificate to be signed by a CA. >> >>> Its seems that

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Abe Racioppo
290620161352 On 6/29/16, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> But surely the openssl command line tool should provide a mechanism for >> allowing an X25519-based certificate to be signed by a CA. > >> Its seems that the "certificate request" protocol, which requires >> self-signing, prevents

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Salz, Rich
> But surely the openssl command line tool should provide a mechanism for > allowing an X25519-based certificate to be signed by a CA.  > Its seems that the "certificate request" protocol, which requires > self-signing, prevents this in this case. Yes, that is exactly the point. --

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Michael Scott
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > > To repeat: X25519 only supports key exchange. The 25519 signing > > mechanism is not yet defined. > Which I don't have a problem with. But surely the openssl command line tool should provide a mechanism for allowing an

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Salz, Rich
> To repeat: X25519 only supports key exchange. The 25519 signing > mechanism is not yet defined. And see also: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-pkix/ -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Salz, Rich
>as it objects that X25519 does not support signature.   To repeat: X25519 only supports key exchange. The 25519 signing mechanism is not yet defined. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Michael Scott
Thanks Erwann, but that's not an answer to my question. To get the CA to sign (using RSA or anything) a certificate that contains an X25519 public key, that certificate must first submit to the CA something called a "Certificate request". This takes the form of the supplicant certificate, which

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Erwann Abalea
Bonjour, You may have a classic certificate containing your {X,Ed}{25519,448,whatever} public key once: * an OID is allocated to identify this type of public key (it will go into tbs.subjectPublicKeyInfo.algorithm.algorithm) * a set of associated optional parameters are defined for

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Salz, Rich
> 1. What is CFRG, I don't remember that acronym. Crypto Forum Research Group, part of the IETF's affiliated research group. Co-chair is Kenny Paterson of lucky-13 (etc). Useful documents here as well as pointers to the mailing list https://datatracker.ietf.org/rg/cfrg/documents/ > 2.

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Michael Scott
WellI can help with CFRG - its Crypto Forum Research Group. Mike On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Jakob Bohm wrote: > On 29/06/2016 16:53, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> How do I do this? Using the OpenSSL command line tool, a certificate >>> request must be self-signed, but

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Jakob Bohm
On 29/06/2016 16:53, Salz, Rich wrote: How do I do this? Using the OpenSSL command line tool, a certificate request must be self-signed, but the X25519 elliptic curve (newly supported in version 1.1.0), doesn't do signature, it can only be used for key exchange. You cannot do it. You should

Re: [openssl-users] Creating an X25519-based Certificate

2016-06-29 Thread Salz, Rich
> How do I do this? Using the OpenSSL command line tool, a certificate request > must be self-signed, but the X25519 elliptic curve (newly supported in > version 1.1.0), doesn't do signature, it can only be used for key exchange. You cannot do it. You should look at the CFRG documents on