We (the Ironic team) have talked a couple times about keystone /v3
support and about improving the granularity of policy support within
Ironic. No one stepped up to work on these specifically, and they
weren't prioritized during Liberty ... but I think everyone agreed
that we should get on with
Hi,
Short story/question:
Is keystone /v3 support important to the ironic team? For Mitaka i guess?
Long story:
The previous discussion - guidance from keystone team on magnum (
http://markmail.org/message/jchf2vj752jdzfet) motivated me to dig into the
experimental job we have in devstack for
o: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][keystone][ironic] Use only
> Keystone v3 API in DevStack
>
> We (the Ironic team) have talked a couple times about keystone /v3 support
> and about improving the granu
evelopment Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][keystone][ironic] Use only Keystone v3
API in DevStack
We (the Ironic team) have talked a couple times about keystone /v3 support and
about improving the granularity of policy support within Ironic. No one s
10:25 AM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][keystone][ironic] Use only
>> Keystone v3 API in DevStack
>>
>> We (the Ironic team) have talked a couple times about keystone /v3
>> suppor
