After reading the following pages, it’s unclear what the current API
deprecation policy is and who owns it. (The first spec implies that a change
took place in May 2015, but is silent on what and why.) Any hints? An
authoritative doc would be useful, something other than an IRC log or mailing
Thanks. I’ll figure out which of my colleagues should get involved.
Geoff
On Aug 21, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Everett Toews everett.to...@rackspace.com
wrote:
On Aug 21, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote:
After reading the following pages, it’s unclear what the current
The Mercador meeting this week will be a break-out from the Keystone sprint (as
well as on IRC). See
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MercadorTeamMeeting
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MercadorTeamMeeting
My apologies: I seem to have triggered a bug in Doodle. The support staff are
on the case; I’ll update you when I have more information.
On Jun 29, 2015, at 5:33 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote:
[Note: I’m copying this to openstack-dev in case there are potential
participants
[Note: I’m copying this to openstack-dev in case there are potential
participants who have not yet joined the product-wg list.]
The OpenStack Product WG is considering whether to hold a 2-day mid-cycle
sprint to accelerate its work. We understand that scheduling during the summer
is difficult,
OK, let’s try again. Anyone who is interested in participating in a Product WG
sprint, please complete this Doodle poll:
https://doodle.com/sskuwycqfa3vhu9e
Thanks,
Geoff
On Jun 29, 2015, at 6:34 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote:
My apologies: I seem to have triggered a bug
My apologies for the delay in getting things set up. The weekly meeting for the
Mercador project will be held each Friday at 1700 UTC. The first meeting will
be this Friday, June 26. The meetings will take place on IRC in
#openstack-meeting. The agenda will be tracked at
I’ve been trying to pull together a list of Liberty mid-cycle meetups from
emails, Etherpads, wikis, etc. Many of the usual suspects are missing. Can we
use this thread to gather the full list? (Alternatively, if there’s an
authoritative source that I’ve missed, please share the link.)
What I
Arnold
David Cheperdak
Orran Krieger
Raildo Mascena
For more details, check out our Wiki:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mercador
In anticipation of a lively debate, I’m appending an FAQ [2]
Regards,
Geoff Arnold
--
[1]
https://github.com/openstack-dev/cookiecutter
[2]
FAQ
Q. What exactly
:
Geoff Arnold (Cisco)
David Cheperdak (Cisco)
Orran Krieger (MOC)
For more details, check out our Wiki:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mercador
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mercador
However, in view of the lively debates which have followed recent project
announcements, I’m appending an FAQ
Yes please.
I’ll be making private accommodation requirements. I have family in the area.
Geoff
On May 30, 2015, at 9:28 AM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
Now that we are through the summit, it is time to plan the Midcycle. We have
had a consensus that the Keystone Midcycle would
OpenStack
installations.
So I don't fully understand what enhancing the multi-region support in
Keystone would mean. Would you be able to configure Horizon to login to
multiple independent OpenStack installations?
Mathieu
On 2015-05-13 5:06 PM, Geoff Arnold wrote:
Further digging suggests
. [citation needed]
Puzzled.
Geoff
On May 14, 2015, at 7:56 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
On 14/05/15 10:39, Geoff Arnold wrote:
+1
There seems to be a significant disconnect between Heat, Horizon and
Keystone on the subject of multi-region configurations, and the
documentation
+1
A wiki page laying out a mutually agreeable taxonomy seems like a good starting
point.
Geoff
On May 14, 2015, at 7:47 AM, Anne Gentle annegen...@justwriteclick.com
wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com
mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote:
+1
If we don’t want to deprecate AVAILABLE_REGIONS, we certainly need to clean up
the ambiguity. And to be honest, the existing documentation for both
multi-region” schemes (AVAILABLE_REGIONS and Keystone based) is completely
inadequate.
Geoff
On May 14, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Mathieu Gagné
-region Heat.
Thoughts?
Geoff
On May 13, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote:
I’m looking at implementing dynamically-configured multi-region support for
service federation, and the prior art on multi-region support in Horizon is
pretty sketchy. This thread:
http
I’m looking at implementing dynamically-configured multi-region support for
service federation, and the prior art on multi-region support in Horizon is
pretty sketchy. This thread:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2014-January/004372.html
is the only real discussion I’ve found, and
tl;dr I’d like to use a slot in the cross-project track to discuss the best way
of managing cross-project, multi-cycle initiatives, using the forthcoming Cloud
Service Federation (Broker) project to make it concrete rather than
theoretical. Desired outcome: recommendations to Product group,
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver)
Tim
From: Geoff Arnold [mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com]
Sent: 28 April 2015 08:11
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical
or something that highlights what
the desired path forward is with regard to domains?
Thanks,
Travis
On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote:
Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have
some comments.
Geoff
On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM
In preparation for Vancouver, I’ve been looking for blueprints and design
summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone hierarchical
multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious candidate is Glance,
where, for example, we might want domain-local resource visibility
Good points. I’ll add some details. I’m sure the Reseller guys will have some
comments.
Geoff
On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions.
-Nikhil
From: Geoff
, thus
getting a more robust code.
Best regards,
Miguel
On 16/4/2015, at 6:24, Geoff Arnold ge...@geoffarnold.com
mailto:ge...@geoffarnold.com wrote:
Yeah, we’ve taken account of:
https://github.com/openstack/keystone-specs/blob/master/specs/juno/keystone-to-keystone-federation.rst
schema that will allow a tenant (or a broker) to
determine the characteristics of virtual regions. (Such a model might be a
useful complement to the RefStack work.)
Geoff
On Apr 16, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Geoff Arnold
and generate project scoped tokens, though you'd need
project+region scoped tokens, which I'm not sure exists today?
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Geoff Arnold [ge...@geoffarnold.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 12:05 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing
to identify
unexpected dependencies as soon as possible. For this reason, we’d like to
discuss it in Vancouver as part of the cross-project track in the Design Summit.
Geoff Arnold
Cisco Cloud Services
geoff(at)geoffarnold.com
geoarnol(at)cisco.com
@geoffarnold
” is accurate, but probably inappropriate!)
Geoff
On Apr 15, 2015, at 7:07 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/15/2015 04:23 PM, Geoff Arnold wrote:
That’s the basic idea. Now, if you’re a reseller of cloud services, you
deploy Horizon+Aggregator/Keystone behind your public
Thanks Thierry. I really like the Google Docs form to submit new proposals. Now
if someone could please fix the form so that the Topic fields in new entries
are word-wrapped correctly… ;-)
Geoff
On Apr 9, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
If
consumption policies (e.g. Nova AZ “foo” is not available to
customers of reseller “bar”).
I strongly doubt that any of this is particularly original, but I haven’t seen
it written up anywhere.
Cheers,
Geoff Arnold
Cisco Cloud Services
geoar...@cisco.com mailto:geoar...@cisco.com
ge
Clint: do you have a more precise agenda for the meetup?
I like what Morgan’s proposing for the Keystone midcycle next week:
Day 1: architecture and requirements
Day 2: detail design work
Day 3: hackathon
Cheers,
Geoff
On Jan 4, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Happy
There are (at least) two ways of expressing differentiation:
- through an API extension, visible to the tenant
- though an internal policy mechanism, with specific policies inferred from
tenant or network characteristics
Both have their place. Please don't fall into the trap of thinking that
I’m getting a “Not allowed here” error when I click through to the BP. (Yes,
I’m subscribed.)
On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Gary Duan gd...@varmour.com wrote:
Hi,
I've registered a BP for L3 router service integration with service framework.
32 matches
Mail list logo
