On 19:38 Oct 03, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > Hey everybody!
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to first thank everyone involved, doing this hard work.
Yes thank you all very much for your hardwork. I think we can all agree
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Hey everybody!
>
> Thank you all for your patience over the last week as we've worked through
> the v3 rollout. While we anticipated some problems, we've run into a number
> of unexpected issues, some of which will take
On 10/03/2017 01:06 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2017-10-03 12:00:44 -0500 (-0500), Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> On 10/3/2017 11:40 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>> Our nodepool quota will be allocated 80% to Zuul v2, and 20% to ZUul v3.
>>> This will slow v2 down slightly, but allow us to continue to
On 2017-10-03 12:00:44 -0500 (-0500), Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 10/3/2017 11:40 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> >Our nodepool quota will be allocated 80% to Zuul v2, and 20% to ZUul v3.
> >This will slow v2 down slightly, but allow us to continue to exercise v3
> >enough to find problems.
> >
> >Zuul
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 10/3/2017 11:40 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> > Our nodepool quota will be allocated 80% to Zuul v2, and 20% to ZUul
> > v3. This will slow v2 down slightly, but allow us to continue to
> > exercise v3 enough to find problems.
> >
> >
On 10/3/2017 11:40 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Our nodepool quota will be allocated 80% to Zuul v2, and 20% to ZUul
v3. This will slow v2 down slightly, but allow us to continue to
exercise v3 enough to find problems.
Zuul v2 and v3 can not both gate a project or set of projects. In
general,
Hey everybody!
Thank you all for your patience over the last week as we've worked
through the v3 rollout. While we anticipated some problems, we've run
into a number of unexpected issues, some of which will take some time to
resolve. It has become unreasonable to continue in our current