Am Mittwoch, 14. September 2005 14.43 schrieb Fred A. Miller:
If anything could get me to go back to MickySoft, this IS it pro.
photogs and graphic artists who use Linux are at a HUGE disadvantage
because there's NO WAY in Gimp to get consistant ACCURATE color matching
from the screen to
On Saturday 17 September 2005 8:29 pm, Manfred Burkert wrote:
On screen color isn't my problem..PRINTING is. Getting the image on
screen to paper accurately. I have an Epson Stylus Photo 2200 that, for
the most part, is worthless for it's intended use.
Fred
Ah I understand. I had
On Thursday 15 September 2005 10:00 am, Manfred Burkert wrote:
And for the guy who doen't understand what is colormatching, I suggest you
take two machines, install Suse 10.0 and compare this phantastic wallpaper
of the cameleon on the screens you will recognize they will look different.
Just
Am Do September 15 2005 20:44 schrieb Paul Mansfield:
Fred A. Miller wrote:
If you had to do any VERY HIGH END color printing, you'd understand what
ISN'T
if you do high-end color/graphics stuff, you use a Mac, you don't use
Windows or Linux. Why?
a) color control
b) lack of hassles with
If anything could get me to go back to MickySoft, this IS it pro. photogs
and graphic artists who use Linux are at a HUGE disadvantage because there's
NO WAY in Gimp to get consistant ACCURATE color matching from the screen to
paper, no matter what printer one uses!! This is a VITAL area
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred A. Miller wrote:
If anything could get me to go back to MickySoft, this IS it pro. photogs
and graphic artists who use Linux are at a HUGE disadvantage because there's
NO WAY in Gimp to get consistant ACCURATE color matching from the
Op woensdag 14 september 2005 14:43, schreef Fred A. Miller:
If anything could get me to go back to MickySoft, this IS it pro.
photogs and graphic artists who use Linux are at a HUGE disadvantage
because there's NO WAY in Gimp to get consistant ACCURATE color matching
from the screen to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Fred, i disagree.
I`m working with Gimp, there is no problem here
I beg he speaks about the special screen devices that allows
to setup the screen colors (looks like a tripod). Don't know
if it works with Linux, why not?
jdd
--
pour m'écrire, aller sur:
* jdd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [09-14-05 09:36]:
I beg he speaks about the special screen devices that allows
to setup the screen colors (looks like a tripod). Don't know
if it works with Linux, why not?
He is referring to profiles which are used to match color in/out to
different devices, ie:
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 10:34 am, jdd wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Fred, i disagree.
I`m working with Gimp, there is no problem here
I beg he speaks about the special screen devices that allows
to setup the screen colors (looks like a tripod). Don't know
if it works with
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 9:55 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Sorry Fred, i disagree.
I`m working with Gimp, there is no problem here
Even on my PCC (Mac) its working perfect brite colors nice adjusting and
good prints on Epson and HP printers.
The same colors as my screen colors.
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 10:16 am, Youssef CHAHIBI wrote:
Sorry Fred, i disagree.
I`m working with Gimp, there is no problem here
Even on my PCC (Mac) its working perfect brite colors nice adjusting and
good prints on Epson and HP printers.
The same colors as my screen colors.
No
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred A. Miller wrote:
On Wednesday 14 September 2005 8:45 am, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Fred A. Miller wrote:
If anything could get me to go back to MickySoft, this IS it pro.
photogs and graphic artists who use Linux are at a HUGE disadvantage
13 matches
Mail list logo
