RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

2004-02-09 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Hi Dick See my replies to the two subthreads ;-) going on with this thread. on the stack, while now it will be null instead. I do not think other code relies on that dubious feature. So to me your fix looks ok. Thank you very much for taking the time to check my fix so fast. I will let

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

2004-02-06 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Zetterberg - Original Message - From: Vedovato Paolo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 5:05 PM Subject: RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption Ok, I Found some more on this issue. This Query problems occur only when the ww:table tag is used

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

2004-02-06 Thread Vedovato Paolo
webwork 1.4 and see if you still have the leak? On Feb 5, 2004, at 11:05 AM, Vedovato Paolo wrote: Ok, I Found some more on this issue. This Query problems occur only when the ww:table tag is used. As far as i see in my Profiling Tool the WebTable component tries to do something

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

2004-02-05 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Hi Dick for my replies see inline. You are right that the Query class contains a cache of all expressions (instances of Query). It is a static HashMap in WW1.3 so it is never GC'd as you know. I can see a couple of cases that would make it grow: 1. Parameters that are sent in requests

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

2004-02-05 Thread Vedovato Paolo
this reference changes on each request putting it in the Query Hashtable and so this grows with each request. Any clues about this phenomena? Cheers -Paolo -Original Message- From: Vedovato Paolo Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 9:53 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [OS-webwork

RE: [OS-webwork] WW1.3 Memory Consumption

2004-02-05 Thread Vedovato Paolo
tested this and I don't see the behaviour you describe in the current CVS. Can you try webwork 1.4 and see if you still have the leak? On Feb 5, 2004, at 11:05 AM, Vedovato Paolo wrote: Ok, I Found some more on this issue. This Query problems occur only when the ww:table tag is used

RE: [OS-webwork] Looking into problem

2003-03-28 Thread Vedovato Paolo
quote The problem is that the ChainingActionFactoryProxy copies all parameters from the first Action to the target action (the Redirect action in this case). This includes the errors and errorMessages Maps. So, is the problem then that the validate method in ActionSupport throws

RE: [OS-webwork] Remaining work for 1.3 release

2003-03-25 Thread Vedovato Paolo
here some feedback related to the stuff I asked/reported - WW-136 Redirect does not work properly. Reported by Paolo Vedovato and discussed on list. Is Jason working on this? open - WW-89 Redirect problem. Reported by Paolo Vedovato. Is this problem still there? Related to WW-136? just

RE: [OS-webwork] Remaining work for 1.3 release

2003-03-25 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Yes I posted a version that would be backwards compatible but it seemed as if others (Hani I think) preferred the default behaviour to be changed to be like in the new version. I can modify my posted version and then the table tag/template would have to be modified as well in that case.

RE: [OS-webwork] Redirect problems after migrating from 1.2.x to 1.3

2003-03-21 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Hi Jason I opened an issue in jira where I've attached a testwebapp which demonstrates the bug. http://jira.opensymphony.com/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=WW-136 Thanks for having a look at it :-) Cheers -Paolo --- This sf.net email is

[OS-webwork] Redirect problems after migrating from 1.2.x to 1.3

2003-03-19 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Hi all After having migrated to WW 1.3 I came across following problem: We use the Redirect action from within our actions/commands to redirect to an ErrorHandlingAction in case an Exception arises when executing an action/command. To do so we've overwritten the execute method in our base action

AW: [OS-webwork] Redirect problems after migrating from 1.2.x to 1.3

2003-03-19 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Hi Jason Which version of 1.3 do you have? The released version or the latest CVS? I made a change to make the Redirect action not implement CommandDriven because I was getting this kind of problem when trying to redirect from a CommandDriven action, because the Redirect action did not

RE: [OS-webwork] URLTag changes in ww 1.3

2003-01-29 Thread Vedovato Paolo
sorry to come in so late...;-) I think the default should be how it is now, since after the last change, people have on the whole adapter their code to the new behaviour. no problem with that, but then it should be remembered to adapt the webwork table jsp template to mirror the original

RE: [OS-webwork] Concern and Opinions

2003-01-14 Thread Vedovato Paolo
I also did some reflection on this issue and François summed up nicely all my thoughts. I completely agree with him. -Paolo -Original Message- From: Francois Beauregard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 5:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [OS-webwork]

RE: [OS-webwork] URLTag changes in ww 1.3

2003-01-10 Thread Vedovato Paolo
I remember that it was asked in the mailing list if this change would affect a existing webapp. I remember also that I made a grep through our code and I didn't see that we used the url tag directly without a value attribute. BUT what was missed (I also did forget) was to make a grep though

[OS-webwork] URLTag changes in ww 1.3

2003-01-09 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Hi all we use the webtable ww tag in our application. After installing 1.3.0 rc1 the sorting in our tables in our application doesn't behave correctly anymore. After some investigating I saw that the URLTag in the way that POST'ed data isn't included anymore when the url tag has no value

RE: [OS-webwork] Ognl as replacement for WW EL

2002-12-30 Thread Vedovato Paolo
PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 8:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Ognl as replacement for WW EL Vedovato Paolo wrote: I think that it's a very important point to be able to switch to XWork without having code changes AND to have all the improvements (like performance

[OS-webwork] Bug in EL/VS?

2002-12-13 Thread Vedovato Paolo
ww 1.2.1 I came scross following problem: two variants of methods in an Action: 1) public boolean isList() 2) public boolean isLIST() if I access 1) with the property or if tag (eg.: ww:property value=List /) the method is NOT processed. if I access 2) with ww:property value=LIST / it IS

RE: [OS-webwork] Speaking of Docs

2002-12-10 Thread Vedovato Paolo
hi pat just a little wish...could you have a look at the webtable stuff I sent to list and add it to the cvs so it comes also with 1.3? btw: great redirect bug fix...now everything works also perfectly on bea :-)) thanks! cheers and good look for the xwork bet... -paolo -Original

[OS-webwork] reuse of a ww:url content

2002-11-26 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Hi Webworker how can I achieve such a behaviour: ww:url value='anAction.action' id=url/ ww:bean... ww:param name='link' value=@url/ /ww:bean since the ww:url tag doesn't have an id to be able to reference to it, I didn't find a way to reuse a ww:url content in a JSP. TIA -Paolo

[OS-webwork] problems with the current cvs version: webwork:include doesn'twork

2002-11-12 Thread Vedovato Paolo
ww: current cvs version app server: wls7.0sp1, orion 1.6.0 using ww:include page=../navigation/header.jsp / fails with following stacktraces: orion: -- javax.servlet.jsp.JspTagException: javax.servlet.ServletException: Not a valid resource path:/html/access/navigation/header.jsp at

RE: [OS-webwork] problems with the current cvs version: webwork:include doesn't work

2002-11-12 Thread Vedovato Paolo
Paolo, Could you add the URL you used and your directory structure to this bug report? Thanks, Maurice Vedovato Paolo wrote: ww: current cvs version app server: wls7.0sp1, orion 1.6.0 using ww:include page=../navigation/header.jsp / fails with following stacktraces: orion

RE: [OS-webwork] JIRA Issue WW-79: PropertyTag shouldn't print when id is sepcify [PATCH]

2002-11-07 Thread Vedovato Paolo
+1 to change the behaviour in 1.3 -Paolo -Original Message- From: Maurice C. Parker [mailto:maurice;vineyardenterprise.com] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] JIRA Issue WW-79: PropertyTag shouldn't print when id is sepcify [PATCH]