I'm starting a list of requirements for an IoC container in Xwork.
Here's what I've got so far:
1) Ability to have nested component scopes (Application - HTTP Session
- HTTP Request - Action Invocation)
2) Ability to resolve component dependencies and create components with
dependencies fulfilled
Or just roll your own!
On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 10:24 AM, Jason Carreira wrote:
I'm starting a list of requirements for an IoC container in Xwork.
Here's what I've got so far:
1) Ability to have nested component scopes (Application - HTTP Session
- HTTP Request - Action Invocation)
2)
--- Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting a list of requirements for an IoC
container in Xwork.
Here's what I've got so far:
1) Ability to have nested component scopes
(Application - HTTP Session
- HTTP Request - Action Invocation)
AFAIK, xwork shoid be web-agnostik, or
We already had our own... But should I take this as you volunteering?
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Xwork IoC requirements
Or just roll your own!
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Priblouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Xwork IoC requirements
--- Jason Carreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting a list of requirements for an IoC
What! I'm too busy blaming everyone and everything to write any code
anymore!
My vote (as a dedicated xw/ww non-user) goes to keeping the homebrewn
stuff. pico is neat, but not amazing enough for everyone to have to
live through the yet-another-dependency shock syndrome.
On Friday, July 11,
1) Ability to have nested component scopes
(Application - HTTP Session
- HTTP Request - Action Invocation)
AFAIK, xwork shoid be web-agnostik, or what's
puprose
of splitting ww2 / xwork?
Yes, they should. But that doesn't mean nested
component scopes isn't a
requirement, as
For the issue mentioned below, we should not use HttpSessionListener, but
use HttpSessionBindingListener (
http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/2.3/javadoc/javax/servlet/http/HttpSess
ionBindingListener.html ).
We have the DefaultComponentManager implement this, and initialize it on
valueBound
I've actually put in a patch for this on jira a while back.
--- BOGAERT Mathias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the issue mentioned below, we should not use HttpSessionListener, but
use HttpSessionBindingListener (
http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/2.3/javadoc/javax/servlet/http/HttpSess
But there are quite a bit of overlap between spring and ww2+xwork, so if ww2 go
with that, would it be to just extract the IoC stuff or just pretend the
overlap and extra bagage is not there :)
--- Rob Rudin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Jason - I've used Spring IoC with Webwork 1.3 on two
-Original Message-
From: Heng Sin Low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Xwork IoC requirements
But there are quite a bit of overlap between spring and
ww2+xwork, so if ww2 go with that, would it be
There's definitely way too much overlap - but I think Spring is
distributed as a full JAR and is also separated into smaller
JAR's, and I believe one of these is a core or beans JAR.
When I used the book code, I removed all of the web and JDBC
stuff and compiled just the config-related code into a
Jason,
Aslak just told me the pico team will reply in a lengthy wiki entry to the
Spring constr fud.
So please wait until we have that, and the team can decide which direction
to go.
BTW they are already on the re-wire issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=PICO-22
Cheers,
On another note:
Jason, what the f*ck are you talking about?? Can you explain the issue with
requirement 3? If the container can be serialized, and the components too,
what is the issue then? Why do you need to re-wire after
serialization/deserialization?
Cheers,
Mathias
-Original
Yeah, they're going to comment, but not fix anything. In fact, they're
pulling out the Bean Property stuff they put in:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=PICO-23
I created the Jira issue you linked, if you look. The last comment on it
is this:
Jon Tirsen [ 11/Jul/03 09:11 AM
I'm not talking about the container. I'm talking about an Action.
Lets say I create an Action in a Swing app and populate it with some
data. Then I send it, serialized, to a special ClientDispatcherServlet
which deserializes the Action and executes it Except it has
component dependencies...
Yeah, that's an interesting idea, except that you've just blown up Type
3 IoC. Picocontainer is all about wiring the dependencies at object
creation. How do you suggest the component re-wire its own dependencies?
Plus, if they did allow you to do this, which I don't think they do or
ever will, it
SiteMesh should allow all of this. I don't know enough about how Tiles
works, but there is nothing special going on with WebWork. So if you can use
servlets with Tiles, you can use WebWork actions with Tiles.
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Agreed, especially pico is still alpha/beta ware.
As for the original IoC stuff, I'm not sure the enabler interface is the best
approach. Would it be feasible to discover the component dependency by
inspecting the object's properties ( setter ) ?
--- Pat Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
In response to your blog:
There is nothing that requires the component to re-initialize a field that
has been marked as transient. If the component requires a field to be set
that hasn't been it also has the option to throw a Runtime Exception.
My main point when I proposed using transient as
I was reading you comments on the pico issue and thought that this was a
strange use case. Why would you define an Action used by your swing app with
component dependencies that had to be set in the ClientDispatcherServlet? I
would think you would just proxy your data or model to a custom
We're going to be looking at ways to possibly get rid of the enablers. Stay
tuned...
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: Heng Sin Low [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Decision: Xwork IoC
Agreed, especially pico is still
Agreed, especially pico is still alpha/beta ware.
As for the original IoC stuff, I'm not sure the enabler
interface is the best
approach. Would it be feasible to discover the component dependency by
inspecting the object's properties ( setter ) ?
Then you don't know for sure which
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:56:21 +0100, John Patterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking into using Webwork for an upcoming web project. In the past
I have used Struts with the Tiles extension which I really liked for its
page layout abilities. It seems that with Webwork most people are
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:22:11 -0700, Pat Lightbody [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
All, After reading the incredibly long thread here and the mind-numbingly
long thread in pico-dev, I've come to the following conclusion:
The difference between contructors and bean properties is so small that
it's
Sending a command to be executed is classic strategy / command pattern.
It's good because it allows you to send the object you want to be run
pre-populated...
-Original Message-
From: Brock Bulger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ignore this email. My mail reader is doing weird things :(
M
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:53:30 -0700, Matt Ho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:17:54 -0700, Brett Knights [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the discussion so far there are two examples of things I need to do
to in
my
The latest versions of OSCore and PropertySet have been released in
preparation for the upcoming XWork, WebWork, and OSWorkflow releases
(XWork/WebWork will be betas).
-Pat
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft
Error proof Web apps,
This would make the template impossible to reuse in another page that
required different navigation or other areas of the page to contain
different components. The problem is due to the lack of separation between
the template and the specification of what should be placed in the template.
With
Here's where I've been searching...
http://www.mail-archive.com/opensymphony-webwork%40lists.sourceforge.net
/
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] how to search this
SiteMesh allow for components... just use inline decorator tags. I do this
all the time with form tags. If you use JIRA, any form entry field is
actually a sitemesh component. Is that what you want?
-Pat
- Original Message -
From: John Patterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Now I am behind a firewall and can't get at cvs with the :pserver protocol.
I could however get in with ssh if I had a username and password. Is there
an anonymous equivalent read-only user for access ssh access?
Is there a place where nightly source snapshots are available on the net?
32 matches
Mail list logo
