Title: RES: [OS-webwork] that keyword...
I agree that using 'that' looks a lot like something from JSR 666 :)
+1 for 'top' (t would be too cryptic for me)
peace,
-cv
-Mensagem original-
De: Patrick Lightbody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 20 de outubro de
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Dawson
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OS-webwork] that keyword...
I am sorry to bring up what must be a topic people are sick of by
now
but why that for the top of the value stack --
there are other words
[1] will give you the stack starting back one... [1].that gives you the
same as .. In ww1.x
-Original Message-
From: Francisco Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 5:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] that keyword...
i always
Title: RES: [OS-webwork] that keyword...
If someone can open a jira issue for this
Ill be sure to get this in to xwork beta 2.
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003
10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL
I am sorry to bring up what must be a topic people are sick of by now
but why that for the top of the value stack --
there are other words that would be better. that sounds like a bad joke.
how about top
stackTop
or something similar. (even better would be a 1 character keyword).
I
On the bright side, Pat has promised (and in fact, already has it
functional) to have the ww1 valuestack available. As soon as this is
ready, you won't have to use ognl, and portage will be infinitely
easier (not to mention that you'd no longer have to use a joke syntax!)
On Friday, October
