-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/08/16 00:20, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 29/08/16 23:32, Steffan Karger wrote:
>> HI,
>
>> On 29 August 2016 at 23:03, David Sommerseth
>> wrote:
>>> On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/08/16 00:20, David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 29/08/16 23:32, Steffan Karger wrote:
>> HI,
>
>> On 29 August 2016 at 23:03, David Sommerseth
>> wrote:
>>> On 29/08/16 22:45, David Sommerseth wrote:
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which
> defaults to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for
> clang, but might even differ per distro.
>
> One of the reasons to accept
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/08/16 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which
> defaults to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for
> clang, but might even differ per distro.
>
> One of the reasons to accept
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Steffan Karger wrote:
> On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults
> > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Steffan Karger wrote:
> On 28 August 2016 at 21:42, Steffan Karger wrote:
> > Previously, we would use the compiler's default C version, which defaults
> > to gnu89 for GCC < 5, gnu11 for GCC > 5, and c11 for clang, but
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 03:30:45PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Arguably we could add openvpnserv2 to 2.3.x, but I would rather focus on
> getting 2.4.0 out.
This. 2.3 is what it is, and the great stuff happens with 2.4 :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 03:30:45PM +0300, Samuli Seppänen wrote:
> Arguably we could add openvpnserv2 to 2.3.x, but I would rather focus on
> getting 2.4.0 out.
This. 2.3 is what it is, and the great stuff happens with 2.4 :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Thanks a lot Samuli.
I cloned "openvpn-build" repo yesterday and created my patch branch off the
last commit on "release/2.3" but after reading your email I checked it out
again and saw that my "release/2.3" was actually 1 commit behind the
origin. I am still trying to understand how this
Thanks a lot Samuli.
I cloned "openvpn-build" repo yesterday and created my patch branch off the
last commit on "release/2.3" but after reading your email I checked it out
again and saw that my "release/2.3" was actually 1 commit behind the
origin. I am still trying to understand how this
Il 29/08/2016 11:05, Bojan Komazec ha scritto:
> This is my first attempt to contribute to OpenVpn project. Please let me
> know if I am doing it right.
Forgot to thank you for your contribution, so here it comes: thank you! :)
When you contribute to openvpn-gui, openvpn-build or easy-rsa you
Il 29/08/2016 11:05, Bojan Komazec ha scritto:
> This is my first attempt to contribute to OpenVpn project. Please let me
> know if I am doing it right.
Forgot to thank you for your contribution, so here it comes: thank you! :)
When you contribute to openvpn-gui, openvpn-build or easy-rsa you
12 matches
Mail list logo