background process affect battery life?
.w
On May 16, 2010, at 5:25 AM, Marco Bonetti wrote:
Don't worry: I'm working on it :-P
See http://sid77.slackware.it/iphone/
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord
Interesting. Well, I ask this one because I've always found that my battery
drains the fastest when using the 3G or EDGE connection. Significantly faster
than playing an intensive 3D game, even...
.w
On May 16, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Marco Bonetti wrote:
Backgrounding itself is completely
Wow Runa, while I unfortunately can't help with any translations, I just want
to say that that app looks wonderful and wish you the best of luck with it.
Wish I had something like that on my iPhone!
.w
On May 15, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
As many of you probably know, Tor
Does Tor do any kind of traffic shaping?
.w
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Hi all,
I am getting a lot of these messages lately -- how can I increase the wait time?
502 Server dropped connection
The following error occurred while trying to access http://xxx
502 Server dropped connection
Generated Sat, 15 May 2010 19:37:54 EDT by Polipo on xxx.local:8118.
.w
In this case, purposely 'shaping' the traffic so that it looks like something
other than what it actually is (ie, not Tor traffic).
.w
On May 15, 2010, at 11:18 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
What do you mean by traffic shaping
, and some kind of visualization of
what the impact would be for a given amount donated?
And make it beautiful and simple, like this: http://www.charitywater.org/donate/
.w
On May 12, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
I first planned to offer a certain bandwidth push for one-time
Is there a torify equivalent for Mac OS X, or does Torify work on that
platform... And if so, can it wrap GUI applications as well? Asking because I'd
like certain applications on my system without individual proxy settings to use
Tor, and certain apps of the same class not to...
.w
Well, assuming that it is only a technically-minded userbase that installs Tor,
then maybe! Do you guys have any sense of whether or not that's actually true?
.w
On May 13, 2010, at 6:57 PM, Martin Fick wrote:
I would think that the slowness of the network would be
reminder enough
. . . would have a beneficial impact.
All this being said, I completely understand, even even fully empathize with
your reaction. I would never want to see Tor be packaged with crapware!
.w
On May 13, 2010, at 8:31 PM, Jon wrote:
I can not speak for everyone else, but for my self, if I read
be at least
mildly useful?
.w
On May 14, 2010, at 12:59 AM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
If by GUI applications you mean native OS X carbon/cocoa apps, unlikely
unless you can launch them from the command line
Have you guys thought organizing a (very) public Kickstarter.com project for
the purpose of raising the funds and creating awareness of need?
.w
On May 10, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
Hi,
At the moment, 25% of all traffic exits through Blutmagie (thanks
Olaf!). I guess we
Sebastian Hahn wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Praedor Atrebates
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: 20.11.08 21:10:08 An:
or-talk@freehaven.net Betreff: Problems with irc because of tor?
Why does running tor suddenly cause me to be unable to connect to
freenode? I am NOT running a
Praedor Atrebates wrote:
Now I'm really lost on this. Tor quit running (I cannot run
tor-0.2.1.7-alpha
for more than a couple minutes, so it seems. It just suddenly quits without
any errors. It's running then suddenly it isn't.
OK, that's another thing.
Looks like it is back to the
Robert Hogan wrote:
Do you run a server yourself? If so, your real IP may be on the irc
server's 'tor blocklist'.
I don't think so, Freenode wouldn't send the error-message with
127.0.0.1 then, but with his public IP-address.
Alex.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ted Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 22:39 +0100, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
Robert Hogan wrote:
Do you run a server yourself? If so, your real IP may be on the irc
server's 'tor blocklist'.
I don't think so, Freenode wouldn't send the error-message with
127.0.0.1 then, but with his
misc wrote:
Is there any way at all to get keys from LDAP server through Tor?
LDAP uses TCP, so yes, it should be working if you configure GnuPG to
use a proxy.
Alex.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jonathan Addington wrote:
Can someone explain why I get this message every time I post? Or
delete whatever email address sends this back to me?
You're maybe posting not with the same email-address as you subscribed.
I don't post often, but it is annoying when I do.
Maybe it's just that.
Kasimir Gabert wrote:
If you really need to access a flash script you could set up CGIProxy
(http://www.jmarshall.com/tools/cgiproxy/) to route through Tor, and
then connect to a local CGIProxy proxy with it's settings enabled
for rewriting scripts. This will not, of course, guarantee your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geoff Down wrote:
Presumably any problems could be avoided by changing the pseudo-tld to
something really obscene...
.onionporn?
SCNR
Alex.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karsten N. wrote:
Hi,
I have found this at core.onion (http://eqt5g4fuenphqinx.onion/page/31)
gpfTOR1-4: Those are operated by a front end of the German
Verfassungsschutz.
Wtf? :-)
Is it only the paranoia of some individuals or
Works here with torify, though painfully slow. You might chose a stream
which uses less bandwidth:
$ ./torify mplayer -playlist
http://wstreaming.zdf.de/zdf/veryhigh/080609_smm.asx
...
STREAM_ASF, URL:
Man Man schrieb:
Hi!
Aloha!
I am using Gmail at https://mail.google.com/ with tor.
When I am at login, browser will state that the connection is only
partially secure, ie. some items (I do not know what) are not
encrypted. However, once I untor, I am able to get into the fully
secure
Hi all,
following up a discussion on #tor I made up a Wiki-article about the
abovementioned subject.
https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/RecommendedSoftware
Abstract: To create a list of Applications Recommended For Use With
Tor [2]. Those applications must obey the rules of
1) using the proxy
Kyle Williams schrieb:
Hello Alex,
Aloha Kyle!
I've already logged into the Wiki and updated the Test Procedures section.
Seeing as I've found lots of IP disclosure vulnerabilities in the past
(and future?), I for one would be more than happy to help with this.
Thanks. The whole section is
I've not tried to setup a TOR node with your config, but I'll tell you
how I got mine to work :
Assumptions for the following configuration:
1.1.1.1 - Public IP address of Firewall (assumes you are using NAT
internally)
2.2.2.2 - Private IP address in use on the TOR server
:9090 -
Based on a thread from last October, I don't believe they are
registering 'named' nodes anymore.
I think the loss of the 'named' status is the worst part of the key re-
gen process - for those of us that run legacy, named nodes.
Now, time to roll keys on my nodes . . . .
Robert
On May
Rochester TOR Admin schrieb:
A few other environment factors:
- my firwall is a pretty old machine with a very slow NIC
- my tor server NIC is very cheap [$10]
Could anyone give me some insight about what they think might be going on?
I'm not sure... what's a pretty old machine? I mean,
Oh, and memory might be an issue too. If your machine starts paging and
swapping it'll suffer from it.
at-sar helps there too.
Alex.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Tom Hek schrieb:
Thanks :) My ISP reconnected me again but I had to promise to never run
Tor again. Tomorrow I'm going to call them and try to change their
minds. XS4ALL is a ISP who stands for freedom of speech, they are
against censorship, etc etc. If they knew what Tor was they wouldn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Bennett wrote:
In the United States, knowingly giving false information to a federal
law enforcement officer is a felony, so as soon as they found out you had
deceived them, they would likely charge you with that crime.
That sounds a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[...snip...]
A bit of quoting[1] would've been nice. It's hard to follow that email.
Alex.
[1] http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kazaam schrieb:
Hi, I myself am using the foxyproxy plugin and not torbutton. With
foxyproxy I simply make a blacklistrule which routes evertyhing
through tor and only whitelist pages I'm really trusting.
With TorButton I see many problems:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
accept no limits schrieb:
Now the server has new IPs and this exit node will soon be back.
Congratulations!
Bye
accept no limits
Alex.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Bennett schrieb:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:55:36 +0100 Tom Hek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i'm changing my public IP number ten times per day and to avoid
confusion,
*Ten times per day?* Please tell us again why it is you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ringo Kamens wrote:
This is certainly not adviseable because of the lack of security built
into windows and the possible backdoors.
I ain't no Windows-advocate but I find this argument a bit weak.
Nowadays all the modern operating systems have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:09:16PM +0100, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
I ain't no Windows-advocate but I find this argument a bit weak.
Nowadays all the modern operating systems have the same problems: To
http://openbsd.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Schnehl wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
Jan 02 12:46:06.204 [debug] TLS error: syscall error while reading
(errno=54: Connection reset by peer) Jan 02 12:46:06.204 [info]
connection_read_to_buf(): tls error [connection reset]. breaking
(nickname
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
F. Fox schrieb:
[I was going to leave your quoted message in... but my Lord, is your
monitor as wide as a football field?! =xoD ]
Since you're using Icedove, a little hint: If you go to the Edit-menu,
you'll find a nice rewrap message function...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
F. Fox schrieb:
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
F. Fox schrieb:
[I was going to leave your quoted message in... but my Lord, is your
monitor as wide as a football field?! =xoD ]
Since you're using Icedove, a little hint: If you go to the Edit-menu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Stover schrieb:
Is there something similar like Torbutton FF plugin for the
Internet Explorer ?
A quick check on Google revealed:
http://www.geocities.com/claudias_za/
http://swodum.com/
Not sure if any of those are any good though.
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian D. wrote:
Hi folks,
I like the TOR project and want to participate. My question: Is it a
good idea to set up a server, which is not connected to the internet
contineously? -- i.e. I turn on my computer, when I come home from
work and turn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ringo Kamens schrieb:
Just so you know, gmail filtered this as spam.
Not for my gmail-account though...
Comrade Ringo Kamens
Alex.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Trying to run a bridge I get the following error:
Starting tor daemon: tor...
Dec 24 08:13:15.454 [notice] Tor v0.2.0.14-alpha (r12937). This is
experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. (Running on
Linux x86_64)
Dec 24 08:13:15.456 [notice] Initialized libevent version 1.1a
Brian wrote:
I sort of understand what the error is saying but I don't know how to
fix
it. Suggestions?
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Dec-2007/msg00284.html ;-)
- --
Marco Bonetti
Ah, thanks. Now tor started without error. But, how can I tell if the
bridge is working? The log file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Fick wrote:
Yes, but it really is a fairly simple one. I am surprised that HTML
does not seem to have some extension to deal with this already. It
is not much different from encrypted email concepts, just that the
browser needs the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others
What attack?
And I thought the people on this list were against censorship, unless
they, of course, are doing the censoring.
I'm trying to follow the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others
What attack?
OK, i swept back through the postings and /dev/ass wasn't nice too. Got
that, Eugen?
Whatever.
Back to business
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Judge: Ok you are to be held in contempt and in jail xyz, until such
time as you give us the pass phrase to your data
Only a matter of the UK at the moment. Bad enough though.
Most data overwrite programs take too
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
Firefox should in principle not use the DNS if
network.proxy.socks_remote_dns
is set to true (in about:config).
Hm, I'm not sure - I thought this option only works if you're using a
SOCKS-proxy, e.g. connecting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I was in your position I might consider putting some bulk
demagnetizers near my hard drives with a panic switch, with backups to a
secure unknown location.
Now this is definitively a bizarre idea... :-)
That reminds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
F. Fox wrote:
However, let's suppose that we're in a time when German Tor nodes are
now actively keeping logs of all connections. What would be the best way to:
As I already said in an earlier posting, German Tor nodes won't be
starting logging
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Onion wrote:
That's why I'd also prefer a name covering all facets of OR like
'Deutsche Anonymisierserver Initiative - DASI gegen Stasi', with
equivalent shorthand expressions ('British [...] Anonymisation Server
Initiative' = 'BASI') easy to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew wrote:
Actually, it might be wise to develop a feature that lets the client
choose no more than one node from _any_ country, since other EU
countries might use the directive that led to the german law, to pass
similar laws.
Which means, if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Senftleben wrote:
Am Samstag, 24. November 2007 schrieb Alexander W. Janssen:
Andrew wrote:
'Nuff said. Let's stop the nay saying ;) The law isn't active yet.
The law isn't even ratified. And no one even started logging.
The latter
Hi Mirko,
that sounds... disastrous. I'm facing the same thing at the moment, a quite
similar case - although my lawyer currently tries to fight off an actual case
at court, pointing out all the other incidents I suffered of earlier.
This stinks. Beihilfe my a**.
BTW, I'm currently reading
Am Mittwoch, den 14.11.2007, 21:22 +0100 schrieb TOR Admin (gpfTOR1):
Hi Mirko,
1: by German law a Tor node admin is something like an access provider.
You are not responsible for your traffic. If the court have only an IP
address and you have a tor status log, they have nothing.
I'd point
Am Mittwoch, den 14.11.2007, 22:48 +0100 schrieb Thomas Hluchnik:
Has anyone ever tried to speak with the guys from SPIEGEL, FAZ, Sueddeutsche
and so on that they drive own tor nodes? This would be good PR for tor.
Hm, not me, althoug I know that some journalist organisations were
thinking
This is to all german Tor-operators about the possibilty to found a
german Tor legal fund. In german. Obviously.
Hallo Kameraden,
so langsam wird es Zeit. Ich hatte selber schon drei Verfahren gegen
mich, die mich jetzt schon viele hundert Euro an Anwaltsrechnung kosten.
Heute habe ich von
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 00:58 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Hi!
Warum nicht einen Verein gründen? Spenden annehmen. Anwälte bezahlen.
Operator raushauen. So etwas gibt es in Deutschland noch nicht. Aber es
wird Zeit, dass wir so etwas bekommen.
Das verstehe ich jetzt
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 01:19 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[... Privacy Foundation ...]
Ich habe gerade eine Anfrage an die Privacy Foundation geschickt und sie
gebeten, mir zur erklären, was folgender Passus[1] bedeutet:
In Ausnahmefällen bietet die German Privacy Foundation e.V.
On 11/3/07, Udo van den Heuvel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
no peaks.
Why is the traffic like it is?
No idea. Did you ever update/restart your Tor-server?
Could you share your MRTG-grahps with us?
http://pindarots.xs4all.nl/mrtg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/07, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
Hello,
Hi!
In my mrtg graphs I see fair traffic until april, then less traffic
until august and after august it is 2xx bytes/s in average with almost
no peaks.
Why is the traffic like it is?
No idea. Did
On 10/30/07, Florian Reitmeir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Dave Page wrote:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2200579,00.html
Mentions xB browser for anonymous browsing.
and how is this Tor related?
xB is the new name for Torpark.
On 10/15/07, Gregory Maxwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't intend to troll... but wouldn't be ..er better if playing the
videos didn't require using Flash?
My mplayer plays downloaded Flash-videos just fine.
Alex.
--
I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have
On 9/29/07, Watson Ladd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
English is not easy, nor is it a lingua franca.
Everybody knows that Elbonian is the lingua franca in IT.
Watson Ladd
Scnr, Alex.
--
I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have spent
millions in that sort of thing for
The easiest solution would be just using different browser-profiles
and run them simultaneously. One for Tor, one for everything else.
Cheers, Alex.
--
I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have spent
millions in that sort of thing for the last few years, and it is time
On 9/21/07, Arrakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Tor care about the destination of the TCP request, when deciding to
make a new circuit, and thus will use one because it is already dirtied
by that domain?
s/domain/IP-address ?
However, that's all up to the implementation of the internal
Hi!
On 9/18/07, xiando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A question to all Tor-operators:
I'd like to do a survey about all incidents which happened to
operators. Stuff like:
* arrested
* confiscated equippment
* nastygram
* surveillance
* ...
What would be possible other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Funny, I was just coming to post this same question :)
I sent my first request to add a new node (BinaryBLENDER) on August
23rd,
and then sent a follow-up today . . . still no named flag in the
directory.
I would be happy to assist if there's
Just one contra:
Supporting $some_crime always means that you knew about that certain
case they're suing you about. Since you can only know about something
if you start sniffing - which is strictly forbidden - you can't
possibly know about a direct certain crime.
Unless you were it yourself,
On 9/16/07, Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://itnomad.wordpress.com/2007/09/16/tor-madness-reloaded/
Alex, perhaps you or somebody could put up a web page, in German, that
explains in simple terms what Tor is about, aimed at explaining to the
average German police officer
On 9/16/07, Ryan Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's still the possibility that a server op is using their Tor node
as a scapegoat and really is doing bad things (I don't mean to imply
that's the case here). Even if the police know that their suspect is
running a Tor node, what Tor is, and
On 9/16/07, Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that people can donate to help cover your legal fees?
I'll commit to one US dollar. If half the people who read this message
did that, it would at least take a small chunk out of that mountain of
legal fees you're facing. Also,
On 9/16/07, Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you set up a paypal account I would be willing to donate on a
case-by-case basis (in this case, it would be to help with your legal
fees). I think even if you don't need help with legal fees by
receiving donations from all across the world
The interesting part in english:
1) The state filed two cases against me. There are ongoing
investigations for multiple accusations.
2) I'm OK.
3) I have a competent lawyer.
4) I've shut down my server wormhole to protect my family.
5) Don't gossip. I'll break the news when I know I'll be safe.
Hallo! (german - sorry)
On 9/8/07, TOR Admin (gpfTOR1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wormhole ist bereits offline und braucht evtl. Hilfe
Ich will hier einmal proaktiv ein paar Informationen abgeben, um
Gerüchten, Spekulationen und der allgemeinen Paranoia zuvorzukommen:
1) Ja, gegen mich wird
On 8/7/07, Frozen Flame [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, guys.
Hi!
Is anyone interested on the return of the hidden wiki?
Fire at will.
Alex.
--
I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have spent
millions in that sort of thing for the last few years, and it is time it
On 5/19/07, Rouslan Nabioullin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will a reactive firewall affect a middle-node Tor server? I am planning to
use a Smoothwall Linux firewall with the reactive mod
(http://community.smoothwall.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8206).
Well, what does reactive mean? I just had a
OK, that's half off-topic, sorry for that.
To the operator of the node AoF:
You didn't give any contact-info, so I try to reach you on this way:
Your node doesn't seem to work very well, the squid-proxy you're using
ran out of sockets. If you try to use your node, you'll always end up
with the
Hi all,
since the tracker Robert used went down, I set up a tracker elsewhere.
The torrent Metafile can be accessed at
http://yalla.ynfonatic.de/media/TorLiveCD-TestingOnly.iso.torrent
The md5sum of the ISO is 0843b24fb08edf6e0ef64f82083e041b and it would
be good if Robert could confirm that.
On 3/31/07, Karsten Loesing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But who knows? Perhaps they have multiple strategies? :)
Sorry, I can't help myself, but I'm tempted to rename my node to
something intriguing just for the fun of it.
Fear and Loathing in Fort Meade :)
Names mean nothing.
Karsten
Alex.
Well what you could do is remote-debugging.
Follow instructions to build gdb-sever for OpenWRT:
http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=29712
Install gdb-server
Run gdb-server on your WRT:
# gdb-server $ip:12345 /path/to/tor $myoptions
(Tor won't start immediately but will wait for a cont
On 3/9/07, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:37:58AM +0100, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
If TOR would legally qualify as an ISP, we're in deep trouble.
We don't provide access to the Internet, and we're not charging
for it. Last time I looked the data retention
On 3/9/07, James Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11447
A quote which worries me:
Tor servers meet the definition of an Internet service provider,
which means that operators are not required to know what data passed
through the server, said Kevin Bankston, staff
OK, we heard a lot of technical details, I'll cover the non-tech part of it.
On 3/7/07, Fergie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments?
Yes, it's stupid.
First, the legal issues. What he does is overtaking a TOR-user's
machine by malicious code. He's accusing people of being childporn
consuments
On 2/21/07, Stephan Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a bad thing to do? (Apart from getting lots of warning messages
in the log file?) Of course I don't want to cause any problems on the
Tor network.
From a pragmatic point of view that would also mean that you wouldn't
be able to log
University of Indiana graduate student Stephen Soghoian, against whom
the U.S. Government considered filing criminal charges stemming from an
airline boarding pass generator that he posted on-line, in the 28
November 2006 entry of his weblog,/ slight paranoia
Sorry, Mr. Soghoian's first name is Christopher, not Stephen.
--
University of Indiana graduate student Stephen Soghoian, against whom
the U.S. Government considered filing criminal charges stemming from an
airline boarding pass generator that he posted on-line, in the 28
November 2006 entry of
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:45:39PM +0200, gabrix wrote:
I have this in my iptables script:
# TOR
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 9090 -j MARK
--set-mark 2
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 9090 -j RETURN
iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 06:49:09PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
- Workaround for name servers (like Earthlink's) that hijack failing
DNS requests and replace the no-such-server answer with a helpful
redirect to an advertising-driven search portal. Also work around
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 08:45:03PM -0400, Claude LaFrenière wrote:
Hmmm... Bogus exit nodes or bogus DNS servers ?
One or the other way, brute forcing my way through all exit-nodes should
reveil it. Hopefully...
Is it possible that the strange side effects comes, not from the exit nodes
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:31:47PM +0800, Deephay wrote:
Also, the logo linux-magazine.com what you need, when you
need it is a image or just text?
Exactly the same page is at http://www.wdr.tv/.
The content of that page is (gathered with tcpdump):
frameset rows=100%,* frameborder=no border=0
Hi all,
i checked 1161 nodes in total.
269 of them where responsive exit-nodes, all behaving correctly.
9 exitnodes where responsive, but their had some proxy installed which didn't
behave quite correct when you accessed a webpage with the notation
original.url.$nodename.exit; the
Hi all,
considering that I heard from several people that they notice strange
sideeffects since a couple of days - altered webpage, advertisement where no
ads should be - I started a little investigation if there are any obviously
bogus exitnodes in the wild:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:48:13AM -0400, nile wrote:
I experienced this for the first time yesterday. Attempting to go to
legitsite.com redirected me to something that looked like a domain
squatter page - but the domain in the address bar of my browser was
legitsite.com. Quite an interesting
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:34:53PM +0200, Thomas Hluchnik wrote:
fconame.h:147: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'cFCOName_i' with no type
fconame.h:147: error: expected ';' before '*' token
If you're using gcc version 4 or higher, than this is due to the pickyness of
the compiler; see
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:07:49PM +0200, Végh István wrote:
Hello,
There are 2 hosts.
Host 1 is at home (Debian-testing).
Host 2 is at my workplace (WindowsXP Pro)
I use Tor with Privoxy at home (host 1). Firefox with Torbutton plugin
works fine. So it seems everything ok.
At my
The same a but blogyfied:
http://itnomad.wordpress.com/2006/09/28/tor-howto-using-tor-through-a-ssh-tunnel/
Alex.
--
I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have spent
millions in that sort of thing for the last few years, and it is time it
should be stopped.
-- Simon
hi,
I had installed Tor+Privoxy on my Mac, but Privoxy started pissing me
off. I uninstalled Privoxy and Firefox with Tor didn't work - I got the
The proxy server is refusing connections error. I uninstalled whole
pack, restarted my computer, installed only Tor and Tor-startup package,
updated
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
