, April 22, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI
Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I still like to recommend the buffer cache hit
ratio
because its so easy to please customers with
an
improvement - A plsql
PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!! (Anjo/Mogens,
please n
no, the Tijuana trip we were very careful not to drink the water (hm,
that left only alcohol!)
I just didn't write them down, was having too much fun just listening
from IOUG? + OWI Born!! (Anjo/Mogens,
please n
no, the Tijuana trip we were very careful not to drink the water (hm,
that left only alcohol!)
I just didn't write them down, was having too much fun just listening
to them
--- Freeman, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't remember the rest
ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!! (Anjo/Mogens,
please n
no, the Tijuana trip we were very careful not to drink the water (hm,
that left only alcohol!)
I just didn't write them down, was having too much fun just listening
to them
--- Freeman, Robert
Mogens,
I bet Oracle would call it OWIi. As Micro$oft is appending XP to
everything, Oracle puts an i to everything.
Raj
__
Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc.
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com
Any opinion expressed here is
**
-Original Message-
From: Connor McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I still like to recommend the buffer cache hit ratio
]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I still like to recommend the buffer cache hit ratio
because its so easy to please customers with an
improvement
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I still like to recommend the buffer cache hit ratio
because its so easy to please customers with an
improvement - A plsql routine to generate any desired
hit ratio
-
From: Connor McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I still like to recommend the buffer cache hit ratio
McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I still like to recommend the buffer cache hit ratio
because its so easy to please
**
-Original Message-
From: Connor McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I still like
, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I still like to recommend the buffer cache hit ratio
because its so easy to please customers with an
improvement - A plsql routine to generate any desired
Did anyone at IOUG-A mention the two biggest
jokes about The Buffer Cache Hit Ratio ?
First that there are lots of buffer accesses that
Oracle doesn't record in the statistics it gives you;
and secondly that there are lots of buffer accesses
that it does tell you about that have not yet been
I think I can make the same claim - probably
because I'm too lazy. But I have been known
to say things like:
Value X is pretty big compared to value Y
Of course, X is often 'the amount of work you say
you are doing' whilst Y is 'the amount of work the
database is doing'.
But most of the
There is one ratio that is a far better indicator than any of that fancy
wait analysis stuff - the USR (User Satisfaction Ratio). I usually consider
the system to be optimal if the USR is near 97% (the other 3% are chronic
whiners anyway). Of course, this does not apply if the CEO is in that
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:24 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
Mark,
This is from a first-timer at IOUG, so I may be way off here.
A lot of marketing blurb was thrown out at IOUG
John all,
I just used the term, OWI. I do not claim to be the originator of this
term. But I like it very much.
As for the ratios go, I did not use the 'R' word(s) ;) in my short
presentation. It was, however, mentioned in the session abstract to get
attention.
My sincere thanks to all who
Way back when ships were made of wood and men of steel, I saw the phrase
The Wait Interface in an internals class written by members of the COE
of Oracle Support - specifically the Wait Interface was a phrase used
(perhaps invented?) by Roderick Manalack, who's still an honored member
of the
Respect! We might have to move from the basic "Ratios suck" idea to "Bad
Ratios" and "Good Ratios" ideal.
One good ratio: R = S + W
Mogens
Don Granaman wrote:
There is one ratio that is a far better indicator than any of that fancywait analysis stuff - the USR (User Satisfaction
own and not those
of
my
employer or clients **
-Original Message-
From: Connor McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I
Mark,
This is from a first-timer at IOUG, so I may be way off here.
A lot of marketing blurb was thrown out at IOUG (probably a lot less than
usual, and *much* less than Oracle OpenWorld in any case!). As for tools,
many vendors were flogging the same ones, improved versions maybe. One which
I still like to recommend the buffer cache hit ratio
because its so easy to please customers with an
improvement - A plsql routine to generate any desired
hit ratio on a running system is freely available for
download from my site... a consultants dream! :-)
But, serious hat on temporarily,
and not those of
my
employer or clients **
-Original Message-
From: Connor McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!!
(Anjo/Mogens, please
n
I still like
PROTECTED]
cc:
Fax to:
Subject:RE: Anything new from IOUG? + OWI Born!! (Anjo/Mogens,
please n
I still like to recommend the buffer cache hit ratio
because its so easy to please customers with an
improvement - A plsql routine to generate any desired
hit ratio
24 matches
Mail list logo
