Hi Cole,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Night Hawk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some one in some other thread indicated about the developers of OSG
expecting cheques. I don't know if that is just a misconception on the
part of that user or if it is reality.
This is a misconception. None of
From what I can tell from that site, the list is about the Most Reviewed
Open Source Engines, meaning the most number of votes, not necessarily the
quality of the engine. That said, there are a lot of engines out there, and
I am proud to see OpenSceneGraph on the top ten of a list that is not its
And I chose to work on this because of my assumption that
developers
of this are working on this because they WANT to work on
it. Let me
know if that is not the case and if the developers are doing this
because they expect something out of it. I will reevaluate if my
working
Hi Paul et al.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Paul Martz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While it might appear that new features and bug fixes just pop up
in the next release for free, I'm willing to bet that someone is funding
that work a majority of the time.
Perhaps I can add a bit more
Some one in some other thread indicated about the developers of OSG
expecting cheques. I don't know if that is just a misconception on the
part of that user or if it is reality.
Would like someone to clarify if the developers are expecting anything
in return from the users. If my decade
About 95% of the changes I make to OSG are funded by paying clients.
I don't expect users off the street to send me checks, but if you hire me
to modify or enhance OSG for you (or document it) then I'll quote you a
price and I'll expect to get paid.
You can also purchase a support package:
6 matches
Mail list logo
