Re: [OT] ACS - relevant?

s this the experience of others? > > > > Regards > > Dave > > > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: > ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Greg Low (??) > *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 March 2016 1:23 PM > > *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.c

RE: [OT] ACS - relevant?

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Greg Low (??) Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2016 1:23 PM To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> Subject: RE: [OT] ACS - relevant? But that’s my point. Agreed, it’s not necessarily anything to do with w

RE: [OT] ACS - relevant?

4913 fax SQL Down Under | Web: www.sqldownunder.com<http://www.sqldownunder.com/> From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Ken Schaefer Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2016 12:52 PM To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> Subject: RE: [OT] ACS - releva

RE: [OT] ACS - relevant?

March 2016 11:02 AM To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> Subject: RE: [OT] ACS - relevant? Almost agree Ken. I don’t see having “professional” attributes as being related to whether or not IT projects fail. What I do see is a difference in the finger pointing when they fail. If I was t

RE: [OT] ACS - relevant?

PM To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> Subject: RE: [OT] ACS - relevant? I follow what you’re saying Tony but the two concepts are separate. You are describing what you are looking for in an employee. You might consider that “professionalism” but you are not actually describing what most

Re: [OT] ACS - relevant?

*Sent:* Monday, 29 February 2016 9:54 PM *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com <mailto:ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>> *Subject:* Re: [OT] ACS - relevant? __ __ I somehow don't think being a member of the ACS suddenly gives you any more professional

Re: [OT] ACS - relevant?

he failure rate that’s associated with IT projects. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Greg >> >> >> >> Dr Greg Low >> >> >> >> 1300SQLSQL (1300 775 775) office | +61 419201410 mobile│ +61 3 8676 4913

RE: [OT] ACS - relevant?

under.com > > > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: > ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Tony Wright > *Sent:* Monday, 29 February 2016 9:54 PM > *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> > *Subject:* Re: [OT] ACS - relevant? > > > > I

Re: [OT] ACS - relevant?

ed, independent body, or by >>> a Local, State or Federal government authority.? >>> >>> On 29 February 2016 at 16:30, Peter Griffith <pe...@gui-visuals.com.au> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Do you belong to a professional body?

Re: [OT] ACS - relevant?

m:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: >> ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Peter Griffith >> *Sent:* Monday, 29 February 2016 4:43 PM >> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> >> *Subject:* Re: [OT] ACS - relevant? >> >> >> >> Dav

Re: [OT] ACS - relevant?

David, do you consider yourself to be an IT Professional? On 29 February 2016 at 15:35, DotNet Dude wrote: > Haven''t even heard ACS since like 2000. Never comes up in interviews or > any conversation at all from my experience. > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:50 PM, David

Re: [OT] ACS - relevant?

Haven''t even heard ACS since like 2000. Never comes up in interviews or any conversation at all from my experience. On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:50 PM, David Apelt wrote: > The only time I ever hear of the ASC (Australian Computer Society) is the > punch line in bad IT

Re: [OT] ACS - relevant?

well first of all it;s ACS. PG On 29 February 2016 at 15:20, David Apelt wrote: > The only time I ever hear of the ASC (Australian Computer Society) is the > punch line in bad IT jokes. > > > > But last night I had a Pakistani taxi driver who had just got his masters >

RE: [OT] ACS - relevant?

DNA - National Dyslexia Association From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Peter Griffith Sent: Monday, 29 February 2016 3:53 PM To: ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com> Subject: Re: [OT] ACS - relevant? well first of all it;s ACS. PG