RE: Managed Metadata Fields

2013-09-12 Thread Wes MacDonald
Hi, In the past I used these two blog posts: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sharepointdev/archive/2012/04/16/programmatically-create-a-managed-metadata-list-column-mohammed-faizan.aspx http://www.wictorwilen.se/Post/How-to-provision-SharePoint-2010-Managed-Metadata-columns.aspx They both use a

RE: Managed Metadata Fields

2013-09-12 Thread Wes MacDonald
Thanks for the update, I’ll have to check that. Wes From: ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com [mailto:ozmoss-boun...@ozmoss.com] On Behalf Of Nigel Witherdin Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:54 PM To: ozMOSS Subject: Re: Managed Metadata Fields Yeah I do the same thing and hook the mm field up to

Re: Managed Metadata Fields

2013-09-12 Thread Nigel Witherdin
Yeah I do the same thing and hook the mm field up to the termset through code, however if your field declaration includes the WebId or SiteId attributes, or the properties shown in my first post, then the field will appear to correctly hook up to the termset, but won't behave correctly.

Re: Best Prectice for naming sites

2013-09-12 Thread Web Admin
Oh hell yes! Naming conventions are important EVERYWHERE. XD On 12 September 2013 12:20, Sezai Komur sharepointse...@gmail.com wrote: whoah 2,000 characters is way to long. A descriptive page URL, containing words, delimited by dashes is a good thing. You shouldn't make it excessively