Re: Xaml dependency

> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > __ > > ___ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > -- Paul Stovell ___ ozsilverlight mailing list ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight

Re: Accessing page resources from user controls

the DataContext. If so, you can also get > it from there. > > -- > Miguel A. Madero Reyes > www.miguelmadero.com (blog) > m...@miguelmadero.com > > ___ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0

Re: Accessing page resources from user controls

r resource = element.Resources[name]; if (resource != null) { return (T)resource; } var parent = element.Parent as FrameworkElement; if (parent == null) throw new Exception(); return parent.FindResource(name); } On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Paul Stovell wrote:

Re: The verboseness of Visibility

on! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Tony > > > > > > ___ > > > ozsilverlight mailing list > > > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > > > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight

Re: Interesting article re: WPF/Silverlight/HTML5 on riagenic

..@arcamis.com >> *Sent:* Tuesday, 14 September 2010 6:33 PM >> *To:* ozSilverlight >> *Subject:* Interesting article re: WPF/Silverlight/HTML5 on riagenic >> >> >> >> Via CodeProject 'Daily News' (14/09/2010) -

Re: Interesting article re: WPF/Silverlight/HTML5 on riagenic

son > not the issue? what gains do we get with the later? sure put me in a > position of embarrassment that could work and you prove a point or two > (personally i've had a variety of people express their opinions about > me, i long since cared what others think years ago) that i'm

So, is Silverlight dead yet?

...at least for non-phones: http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/30/rip-silverlight-on-the-web/ http://www.zdnet.com/blog/microsoft/microsoft-our-strategy-with-silverlight-has-shifted/7834

Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet?

good for sites. > > > > That said, WPF is better for apps. So that leaves a handful of use cases > for > > Silverlight, e.g. Web Apps, need of Mac support, easier deployment (not > much > > different really), WP7 (which could've been just WPF for Phone), o

Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet?

; ___ ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > <http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight> > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > ___ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > > ___ ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > ___ > ozsilverlight mailing list > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > -- Paul Stovell ___ ozsilverlight mailing list ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight

Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet?

ozsilverlight mailing > list > > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight > > _______ > > ozsilverlight mailing list > > ozsilverlight@ozsilverlight.com > > http://prdlxvm0001.codify.net/mailman/listinfo/ozsilverlight &g

Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet?

27;m not sure MS is pushing that much (or even that little) > for WPF internally or externally. > > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Paul Stovell wrote: > > I took the liberty of graphing this: > > http://www.paulstovell.com/tool-for-the-job > > > > >

Re: So, is Silverlight dead yet?

from Microsoft was Live Mesh. Paul On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Jose Fajardo < jose.faja...@cynergysystems.com> wrote: > With all respect Paul Stovell I can't make sense of what your diagrams > are saying. I apologize if I'm reading them incorrectly BUT the way I rea