-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, I'm just going to go through all the bad stuff I see in Blue, because
that's what I'm good at. Sorry if that seems harsh.
Overall
===
Overall I would say P5EEx::Blue's biggest problem is that it is entirely
designed from the perspective
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:11:32AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
[...]
Conclusions
===
I hope I haven't been too harsh. All in all I'm +1 to make P5EEx::Blue the
start of P5EE (bet you weren't expecting that!). The reason being that we
need to start somewhere, and Stephen
Hi,
Good feedback.
I'll consider each point carefully in due course.
Stephen
At 09:11 AM 5/15/2002 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, I'm just going to go through all the bad stuff I see in Blue, because
that's what I'm good at. Sorry if that seems
At 11:38 AM 5/15/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem simply is that people give p5ee different priorities. I don't
volunteer as well. I once wrote you a mail that I'd think that the whole
concurrency stuff is not getting thought about. You replied that I should
do it then. But
On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a similar opinion. I haven't looked at it, and I won't do that in the
near future. So you might have done something really good, but I doubt that
after reading Matt's mail ...
I think that's the opposite of what Matt was saying.
At least,
Stephen,
I am still watching the list. But due to lack of documentation
(as many others have mentioned) I was not able to catch up with your work.
I did make an effort to trace the code, but it is very involved.
Suffice to say, I did not get too far, especially when it gets to widgets
and events.
Sorry, this isn't what you want to hear...
If you want to gain acceptance in the enterprise, solve a problem
for them. CORBA, with all its backing, failed to succeed as well as
Java and .NET. It takes people with vested interests and power/money
to make things happen.
Let me give you a
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Overall
===
Overall I would say P5EEx::Blue's biggest problem is that it is entirely
designed from the perspective of web development, and I think it suffers
because of that. Generally it's great that this has got off the ground, but
now a lot
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:55:07AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a similar opinion. I haven't looked at it, and I won't do that in the
near future. So you might have done something really good, but I doubt that
after reading Matt's mail ...
Stephen Adkins writes:
I will be downloading bOP and evaluating making P5EE work
with it.
I don't think many people are interested in a bOP adapter.
Rob: Does this seem like a good idea, and would you and
bivio Software Artisans, Inc. look kindly on such a
development?
We always like
At 03:02 PM 5/15/2002 -0600, Rob Nagler wrote:
Stephen Adkins writes:
I will be downloading bOP and evaluating making P5EE work
with it.
I don't think many people are interested in a bOP adapter.
Do you mean people on this list? Why would that be?
or people you have talked to over the last
Stephen Adkins writes:
I don't think many people are interested in a bOP adapter.
Do you mean people on this list? Why would that be?
or people you have talked to over the last year?
No one uses bOP except us, and bOP is all we need. If we needed more,
we'd add it. You might want to look
12 matches
Mail list logo
