hi, i have a wifi controller which is not part of the pf compatible devices.
But it has been suggested to me that you can use pf in radius enforcement
for with it.
in practice, the captive portal belongs to the controller but the
authentication with Active Directory is done by the radio server
Hello,
I have a Tp-Link Omada wifi controller on which I want to implement a local
captive portal but with authentication through an External Radius Server.
In practice, the Omada one will be used for the captive portal and
PacketFence in radius enforcement will be used for the External Radius
HI leonardo,
Im not sure what you're trying to do... but for plain radius authentication
you should use a simple radius server and that's it. In most cases, pf is
meant to be used to do 802.1x when acting as a radius server. PF
developers, please correct me if I'm wrong.
In most case, PF will
Hi Leonardo,
TPLink is not one of the supported vendors for wifi. Not sure what you're
trying to achieve. Would PF just be a radius server for authentication? Im
not 100% sure you can use it that way, as you'd still have to configure the
"switch" to be a particular model / brand / vendor
You can
