OK, thanks for the tip.
Then I will include the incremental (or bug-fix) release letter in the
name of the tarball in the future.
I am actually thinking of moving to a different notation for the
incremental release numbering.
Maybe something like 1.0.10-1, 1.0.10-2, etc.
Then it is
Hi Mark, Erkan
I don't know if I can answer all questions myself.
But the latest version of 1.0 and 1.1 do not use memory mapping by
default. So I/O is conventional.
On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:47 PM, MARK CALLAGHAN wrote:
Me too. I need to learn more about the different files used by PBXT.
Hi,
afaik, there's no specific technique used to utilize the fact that a
record might be in FS cache like cheap random access or something...
Another thing - does PBXT depend on cheap random access at all. I used
blkstat on DBT2 and it appears that there's still some room for
improvement
3 matches
Mail list logo
