Re: [Pbxt-discuss] Tracking down an auto increment issue

://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Paul McCullagh PrimeBase Technologies www.primebase.org www.blobstreaming.org pbxt.blogspot.com ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss Post

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] Tracking down an auto increment issue

. Then it is easier to see at a glance how many bug fix releases there have been. On Mar 18, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Brian Evans wrote: On 3/15/2010 4:46 PM, Paul McCullagh wrote: Hi Brian, Yup, you are right. We should get the tarball out for 1.0.10h. The Windows bug fix was significant. Will do ASAP :) Once

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] Filesystem-cache and PBXT

...@gmail.com ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss Post to : pbxt-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Paul McCullagh PrimeBase

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] Primary Key ordering

___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss Post to : pbxt-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Paul McCullagh PrimeBase Technologies www.primebase.org

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] AVG_ROW_LENGTH computation

://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Paul McCullagh PrimeBase Technologies www.primebase.org www.blobstreaming.org pbxt.blogspot.com ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss Post to : pbxt-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] SHOW ENGINE PBXT STATUS equivalent in Drizzle?

. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss Post to : pbxt-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~pbxt-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Paul McCullagh PrimeBase Technologies www.primebase.org

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] Having trouble using PBXT on Percona-Server 5.1.45

] PrimeBase XT (PBXT) Engine 1.0.10i RC loaded... Apr 18 22:30:52 mcp-new mysqld: 100418 22:30:52 [Note] Paul McCullagh, PrimeBase Technologies GmbH, http://www.primebase.org Apr 18 22:30:52 mcp-new mysqld: 100418 22:30:52 [Note] The server was not shutdown correctly, recovery required Apr 18 22:30

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] free_table_share() != drizzle

, Brian Aker wrote: Hi! On May 14, 2010, at 9:37 AM, Paul McCullagh wrote: Here the engine will follow the table pointer to the field array, where it uses the offsets of the data in a record, in order to copy data in and out of the record. So what you need is the Field** that is in share (aka

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] Row buffers and Objects

be that the Tuple is valid until the next call to the engine on the Cursor that returned the Tuple. In your blog you discuss a nasty little exception to this rule. This would need to be corrected, so that the scoping rules are simple for the engine. Best regards, Paul -- Paul McCullagh PrimeBase

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] Transaction id

Hi Brian, Internally, PBXT uses a 32-bit transaction ID, but this value can wrap around of course. So better is the current transaction log offset. This is a 64-bit value consisting of log ID and log offset. The value is global, and can be retrieved (directly from ha_pbxt.cc) as

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] question about support for concurrent IO

Hi Mark, What has happened here is the index cache is full of dirty pages, and needs to be flushed. When a thread hits this situation it starts a background thread to flush the indexes. That is why we have xt_wait_for_async_tasks() in the top-most stack trace. The background tasks are

Re: [Pbxt-discuss] State of PBXT

On Mar 10, 2012, at 7:30 PM, Henrik Ingo wrote: On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Paul McCullagh paul.mccull...@online.de wrote: In the end it always comes down to the business case. We can't be idealistic about that. The bottom line on PBXT is that it wasn't a loss, but we didn't make