Hi,
On 18/10/12 08:39, SourceForge.net wrote:
Feature Requests item #3578019, was opened at 2012-10-18 00:39
It's already implemented...
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: I'd like to...
Initial Comment:
..know if it is possible to use other than 2^n-blocksizes?!
Not for
Hi,
On 18/10/12 08:39, SourceForge.net wrote:
Feature Requests item #3578019, was opened at 2012-10-18 00:39
It's already implemented...
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: I'd like to...
Initial Comment:
..know if it is possible to use other than 2^n-blocksizes?!
Not for
Bugs item #3578095, was opened at 2012-10-18 06:12
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478070aid=3578095group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Patches item #3577728, was opened at 2012-10-16 14:22
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=3577728group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Any objections? Shall I go with lazy consensus on this one?
.hc
On 10/16/2012 07:17 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey all,
I was tired of dealing with a cryptic ./configure, so I converted OSCx
to be based on the Library Template. THis is currently in the
pd-extended/0.43 branch.
