Re: [PD] [msgfile] previous bug abstraction too simple.

2007-03-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
hi David F. Place wrote: Hi and thanks for your help so far. In my previous message my abstraction was too simple. I can't use [Until] after all. the problem is the same and it can be resolved with [until]. see attached patch. You can see by the attached patch the behavior that I want

Re: [PD] [msgfile] previous bug abstraction too simple.

2007-03-06 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, David F. Place hat gesagt: // David F. Place wrote: In my previous message my abstraction was too simple. I can't use [Until] after all. But maybe you can use [until]? You could stop the [until] through its right inlet whenever you get a wait-line in [textfile]. Then restart it again

Re: [PD] [msgfile] previous bug abstraction too simple.

2007-03-06 Thread marius schebella
David F. Place wrote: However, I also want to be able to seek a certain record without causing any output. That is why I thought I could use [msgfile]'s goto message. Unfortunately, [msgfile] doesn't work at all for the basic process. why not? there is also a spigot object, when you

Re: [PD] [msgfile] previous bug abstraction too simple.

2007-03-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
marius schebella wrote: and the msg file problem... hmm, maybe give explicit messages. I tried to replace the bang with [skip 1, this( and this seems to work it turned out to be a simple reentrancy problem, where the current list was output before the advance to the next list. i have fixed