On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 23:17 -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Simon Wise simonzw...@gmail.com
To: pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] [nbuntil]: an non-blocking [until] replacement
On 17/12/12 08:06
Cool, with [nbuntil] the workload is even spread over the cores! So
now you can do calculations on long arrays without fear of CPU spikes.
And in turn, audio latency may be set to lower level. Great solution
Roman, thanks for sharing.
Katja
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Roman Haefeli
Hi Katja
Thanks for your feedback.
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 11:56 +0100, katja wrote:
Cool, with [nbuntil] the workload is even spread over the cores!
I don't think that [nbuntil] will help in making Pd use more than one
core. Since [nbuntil] is just an abstraction, everything run below it
is
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote:
...
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 11:56 +0100, katja wrote:
Cool, with [nbuntil] the workload is even spread over the cores!
I don't think that [nbuntil] will help in making Pd use more than one
core. Since [nbuntil] is just an
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:18 PM, katja katjavet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote:
...
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 11:56 +0100, katja wrote:
Cool, with [nbuntil] the workload is even spread over the cores!
I don't think that [nbuntil] will
- Original Message -
From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com
To: pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 3:07 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] [nbuntil]: an non-blocking [until] replacement
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 23:17 -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
- Original Message
Why not just trigger each iteration with [bang~]?
-Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com
To: Pd List pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 4:51 PM
Subject: [PD] [nbuntil]: an non-blocking [until] replacement
Hi all
Audio drop
On 17/12/12 08:06, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Why not just trigger each iteration with [bang~]?
because with [bang~] you would get a single iteration per block, rather than as
many iterations as you have time for ... which seems to be the intention of
[nbuntil], and very useful where you might
- Original Message -
From: Simon Wise simonzw...@gmail.com
To: pd-list@iem.at
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 7:58 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] [nbuntil]: an non-blocking [until] replacement
On 17/12/12 08:06, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Why not just trigger each iteration with [bang
