On 15/05/2007, at 20.57, Frank Barknecht wrote:
a new filetype: *.pdt which is a tar-archive that gets unpacked by Pd
when loading, and gets packed by Pd when saving a file as *.pdt
Should it
- be unpacked by Pd into a /tmp folder or into a folder next to
file.pdt or something else, like
I think there is a lot of potential for using color in Pd patches to
represent state. It's just a matter of trying things. It would
take some diving into the guts of Pd.
.hc
On May 10, 2007, at 11:42 PM, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Hallo all,
Just wanted to post an idea...
It would be
..and also the ever-requested 'turn an abstraction into a subpatch' button.
was there ever a good reason not to make that? should be simple, no?
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
hard off wrote:
..and also the ever-requested 'turn an abstraction into a subpatch' button.
was there ever a good reason not to make that? should be simple, no?
well, there are plenty of reasons for not doing that.
first of all: an abstraction has features that a subpatch lacks; that is
what do you gain from turning abstractions into
subpatches??
You gain the advantage of being able to distribute
a Pd patch built from many disparate abstractions as
a single file.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what do you gain from turning abstractions into
subpatches??
You gain the advantage of being able to distribute
a Pd patch built from many disparate abstractions as
a single file.
this advantage you gain from being able to embed abstractions in
abstractions,
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 17:43 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i would vote for a 'turn subpatch into an abstraction' button though.
and of course the long awaited feature to embed abstractions in
abstractions.
what does this mean? something like libs embed external objects?
roman
Hallo!
i would vote for a 'turn subpatch into an abstraction' button though.
and of course the long awaited feature to embed abstractions in
abstractions.
what does this mean? something like libs embed external objects?
think about maybe like functions in a python script or c program or
On 15/05/2007, at 18.30, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
apart from that, tar allows you to distribute your multi-file Pd patch
as a single file too.
I second that.
A more robust way of loading stuff (from fx. an untar'd tar ball)
would make a better solution. I.e. something that works in
Yes, that's true, the real problem is something else: There is no easy
way to get a list of external/abstraction dependencies for any given
patch. If you could get such a list, complete with file locations, it
would be easier to collect all your patches for an archive file.
~David
On 5/15/07,
Is tar available for Windows users?
On 15/05/2007, at 18.30, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
apart from that, tar allows you to distribute your multi-file Pd patch
as a single file too.
I second that.
A more robust way of loading stuff (from fx. an untar'd tar ball)
would make a better
True, it would be great if these features were somehow automated. Like
a dynamic object creation scheme where the external libraries and
abstractions are created as arguments as they are imported.
Probably too much wishing on my end for that though!
~Kyle
On 5/15/07, Georg Holzmann [EMAIL
Also, if the patch is to be linked from a web page
(link to a single Pd file) then most browsers can
associate the filetype and open Pd. This doesn't
work if the file is tarred or zipped so just
make it a tar file isn't really a satisfactory
solution.
The more robust way is to have everything
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is tar available for Windows users?
Yes, every decent packer for Windows (WinZip, 7-zip etc.) also
supports tar. But ideally this probably should be build into Pd, like
a new filetype: *.pdt which is a tar-archive that gets
I was going to suggest that too! How difficult would that be?
Then, people could pack all libraries and externals needed in a
standalone package if needed.
~Kyle
On 5/15/07, Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] hat gesagt: // [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is tar
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 20:42 -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Just wanted to post an idea...
It would be great if Pd highligted modified abstractions in red in
their parent patch (that is, the one pixel bounding box and text.
When I've modified one of a bunch of abstractions in a parent and
Yes; this suggestion is for when I close the window inadvertently : )
On 5/11/07, Roman Haefeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 20:42 -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
Just wanted to post an idea...
It would be great if Pd highligted modified abstractions in red in
their
Hallo all,
Just wanted to post an idea...
It would be great if Pd highligted modified abstractions in red in
their parent patch (that is, the one pixel bounding box and text.
When I've modified one of a bunch of abstractions in a parent and
close it without saving, I have to open each one to see
18 matches
Mail list logo
