Hi list...
i am working on this right now. And since i never really had a deep
look into all the tabread-thingies, some questions came up.
Just to give you a quick sketch of my approach:
I used the I07-patch and i am working with two of them (each 1
second) so i can swap from one to
Maybe using tabsend~ with a different blocksize in a subpatch would
help with the continuous writing to an array? I dunno. I am interested
in a good solution to this though!
~Kyle
On 5/19/07, Luigi Rensinghoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list...
i am working on this right now. And since i
Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
1) How to avoid clicks when the whole contents of a table is replaced/
updated. I tried something with vlineare there some zero-
crossing modules for that ?
Fade playback volume to zero, do the switch, fade playback volume up.
Vary curve to suit the sound, but
could you post that again as an attachment? my email gives me signs
before every line, so ti can't make it into a pd patch.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 16/05/2007, at 14.34, Damian Stewart wrote:
interesting.
I think it's interesting why Tunderbird and IceDove send Pd patches
as inline text rather the attachments. Or rather why I receive them
as inline while I receive attachments when sent from other clients.
end-of-rant.
Hi List
i come back to an old question, that i havent completely resolved for
myself.
I need something like the phase-vocoder from the fft-examples but for
live-input.
Basically: variable live-time-compression-expansion-delay-something.
Has someone done that before ? Or can someone
Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
Has someone done that before ? Or can someone give me a hint ?
live time-compression wouldn't make any sense, since you can't travel
forward in time or can you? (dun-dun-DUN)
you'd need some kind of spooling/unspooling delay if you wanted live
time-compression to
Am 15.05.2007 um 16:03 schrieb Damian Stewart:
Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
Has someone done that before ? Or can someone give me a hint ?
live time-compression wouldn't make any sense, since you can't travel
forward in time or can you? (dun-dun-DUN)
you'd need some kind of
maybe easier to go the granular route than mess about with fft. i
just did a quick search for 'realtime timestretch' and a lot of people
are saying that the granular based patches/plugins are good.
makes sense toocos if you use a phase vocoder approach, you will
have to speed thru the audio
Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
Thats exactly what i mean..
a variable realtime-time-expansion ;-)
i had a pretty thorough dig through I07.phase.vocoder a few months back.
what you'd basically need to do is something along the lines of using
[tabwrite~] to write the audio signal in to $0-sample,
Thanks a lot to all.
especially for putting my idea somewhere between Albert Einstein and
Freddy Mercury ;-)
welli'll post my results
Luigi
Am 15.05.2007 um 17:12 schrieb Damian Stewart:
Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
Thats exactly what i mean..
a variable realtime-time-expansion ;-)
i
11 matches
Mail list logo
