On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 19:46 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
marketing lingo
I am not sure, if it meets your criteria, but some of it features are:
That's not marketing lingo. Instead, you would be saying : «
I am sure that it meets your
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
marketing lingo
I am not sure, if it meets your criteria, but some of it features are:
That's not marketing lingo. Instead, you would be saying : «
I am sure that it meets your criteria. NetPd has the features that YOU
need. You are a hard-working
-list@iem.at
Envoyé: Jeudi 22 Avril 2010 19h27:10 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
Hi Patko
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 18:27 +0200, colet.patr...@free.fr wrote:
I just wanted to check if someone has
that's of course true. but two details are against it:
- if you really know what you want, you'll want to design your own patch
for that, and won't take any other already made programs
- but if you go for it, you'll spend your time programming the mixer,
instead of the project you were
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, João Pais wrote:
if you need a program to mix tracks in a session, then there's no
point in even thinking of programming something like that in pd, just
use any of the very good programs around.
There is a very simple and oft-overlooked point to
if you need a program to mix tracks in a session, then there's no
point in even thinking of programming something like that in pd, just
use any of the very good programs around.
There is a very simple and oft-overlooked point to reinventing such
programmes inside of pd : it gives you a mixing
- if you really know what you want, you'll want to design your own patch
for that, and won't take any other already made programs
- but if you go for it, you'll spend your time programming the mixer,
instead of the project you were thinking of in the first place.
I would guess that unless someone
hmmm, in fact I'm using workstations like ardour, (I don't often use ardour
thought even if I've set a bunch of scripts to configure jackd and pd with it)
since ages for producing
sounds or instruments made with dataflow stuff, I just wanted to check if
someone has invented this wheel in
So maybe you need and want a shitty clarinet to achieve the objective
you have, maybe you need a quite expensive one. Nevertheless, the point
is what you do with it.
The clarinetist of one chamber orchestra I've wrote for had to use a 'C'
clarinette that sounded like shit to play all the
Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Avril 2010 14h28:31 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
So maybe you need and want a shitty clarinet to achieve the objective
you have, maybe you need a quite expensive one
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:28:31 +0300
From: Jo?o Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Message-ID: op.vbik1qu2vpc...@jmmmp-thinkpad.fritz.box
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed
anyway, whatever I'd say after this, the answer would be that I'm not a
good musician,
or that pd is not made for me,
or even worth, that I don't have a good taste in music, etc...
you're being paranoid. and if someone do, you ask them why, in case it's
worth it.
My conclusion is that
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, João Pais wrote:
if you need a program to mix tracks in a session, then there's no point
in even thinking of programming something like that in pd, just use any
of the very good programs around.
There is a very simple and oft-overlooked point to reinventing such
/ Vienne
//Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
//A djembé drummer says: You cannot make dance music alone, you need
//other drummers as well. Patko says: Making dance music requires
//advanced technologies. Roman says: Where is the sine? I cannot dance
//without an [osc~ =20
+01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
without a good media, we can't get good results
Guess my point wasnt clear yet. I'm saying every media has its potential,
there's no good or bad, anything can be best
--- On Thu, 4/15/10, Phil Stone pkst...@ucdavis.edu wrote:
From: Phil Stone pkst...@ucdavis.edu
Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
To: PD list pd-list@iem.at
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 7:49 PM
In addition to disagreeing vehemently
with your main point (Pd
...@free.fr
Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
To: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 5:53 PM
Matteo Sisti Sette a écrit :
Frank wrote:
It's not so much the tool, as it is the
skills that makes music
sound good.
That is true for really
thanks, :)
Selon Rory Walsh rorywa...@ear.ie:
Sure and wood is ONLY for burning. I don't mean to be rude either but
if you think music only qualifies as music if people can dance to it
then that I think perhaps you should learn a little more about it.
Until then you can get your rocks off to
I would care about how the clarinette is sounding, if I or a skilled clarinetist
can't make a melody with it, i would play with noises...
Selon Alexandre Porres por...@gmail.com:
pd is just a tool for learning dsp, there is no such project that show how
pd is cool to make people moving on
--- On Fri, 4/16/10, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
To: PD list pd-list@iem.at, Phil Stone pkst...@ucdavis.edu
Date: Friday, April 16, 2010, 8:11 AM
--- On Thu, 4/15/10
Oh, wasn't the metaphor clear, really?
well, no problem, here you go then... once more...
We don't care to know if someone says; Hey, I got a clarinet, we wanna
know what he is doing with it, in a sense that it'd make more sense if the
person would come and say; Hey, check out, look what I do
show me a patch that correctly mix soundfiles.
Btw- I don't mean this will be a 'Hello World' for Pd at some future
point in its development. I just mean it's a good way for users to
test how flexible and expressive their software is in a live setting.
I mean let's face it-- you crash at
ej bonitos just pasting some mustard to this topic too:
in german there's a saying wenn der bauer nicht schwimmern kann liegts an der
badehose
translated somehow: when the farmer can't swim it's because of his bathing
trunks
so it's about swimming not dancing!
crossfading salutis
ø
don't
Oh, wasn't the metaphor clear, really?
nope
well, no problem, here you go then... once more...
there you go
We don't care to know if someone says; Hey, I got a clarinet, we wanna know
what he is doing with it, in a sense that it'd make more sense if the person
would come and say; Hey,
This (rather pointless) discussion is really clogging the list since
ages now, whithout IMHO giving any real suggestion on improvements for
Pd... It started IIRC with someone coming to mailing list about software
A and sayng hey software B is much better (smoother, uh?) than A
which sucks..
I
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:04 +0200, colet.patr...@free.fr wrote:
show me a patch that correctly mix soundfiles.
That interests me. Can you elaborate a bit more what you mean by
mixing? Then I'd be also interested in what way Pd fails and how
another software (you name it) succeeds in doing it
just uploaded 2 vanilla workouts. these are not tracks. just me jamming in
the staffroom of the school where i work. not sure if they will change
anyone's mind on anything, but i think they show a bit of dynamic range and
the possibilities offered by vanilla pd and perseverance.
Matteo Sisti Sette a ?crit :
Frank wrote:
It's not so much the tool, as it is the skills that makes music
sound good.
That is true for really good tools. Needless to say that Pd is one of
them.
sorry, I might going to be rude,
but I've never heard some music completely made with
Smoother Audio than Pd?
This (rather pointless) discussion is really clogging the list since
ages now, whithout IMHO giving any real suggestion on improvements for
Pd... It started IIRC with someone coming to mailing list about software
A and sayng hey software B is much better (smoother, uh?) than
...@ucdavis.edu
Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
To: PD list pd-list@iem.at
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 7:49 PM
In addition to disagreeing vehemently
with your main point (Pd is good for little more than
experimentation), I find this a piss-poor acid test for
music
] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
just uploaded 2 vanilla workouts. these are not tracks. just me jamming in the
staffroom of the school where i work. not sure if they will change anyone's
mind on anything, but i think they show a bit of dynamic range and the
possibilities offered
-list@iem.at
Envoyé: Vendredi 16 Avril 2010 18h53:40 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:04 +0200, colet.patr...@free.fr wrote:
show me
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 12:53 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:04 +0200, colet.patr...@free.fr wrote:
show me a patch that correctly mix soundfiles.
That interests me. Can you elaborate a bit more what you mean by
mixing?
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:18:17PM +0200, olsen wrote:
ej bonitos just pasting some mustard to this topic too: in german
there's a saying wenn der bauer nicht schwimmern kann liegts an der
badehose
I didn't know this one, it's very good. As we've started the quoting
business, I recently
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Lorenzo wrote:
- Switch to some other greater, uhm.. smother :), software
Wait, what is this thread about :
[A] make Pd smoother
[B] make Pd smother
_ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone:
without a good media, we can't get good results
Guess my point wasnt clear yet. I'm saying every media has its potential,
there's no good or bad, anything can be best applied for some purpose,
even a shitty clarinet... it can produce sounds irregularly and with
spectral content that other
From: colet.patr...@free.fr
sorry, I might going to be rude,
but I've never heard some music completely made with PureData that really
sound good.
From: hard@gmail.com
just uploaded 2 vanilla workouts. these are not tracks. just me jamming in
the staffroom of the school where i work.
(sorry to continue this thread)
Matt
By the way, I am Really sorry too... please forgive me.
alex
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:04 +0200, colet.patr...@free.fr wrote:
show me a patch that correctly mix soundfiles.
That interests me. Can you elaborate a bit more what you mean by
mixing?
Interesting, I was more concerned by the use of the word «
-
De: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
À: Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
Cc: colet patrice colet.patr...@free.fr, pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Envoyé: Vendredi 16 Avril 2010 18h53:40 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne
/ Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother
À: Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de
Cc: colet patrice colet.patr...@free.fr, pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Envoyé: Vendredi 16 Avril 2010 18h53:40 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010
--- On Sat, 4/17/10, Ariane stolfi arianesto...@gmail.com
wrote:
From: Ariane stolfi
arianesto...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS:
Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
To: colet.patr...@free.fr
Cc:
pd-list pd-list@iem.at, reduzie...@yahoo.de
Date: Saturday,
April 17, 2010, 1:49 AM
--- On Sat, 4/17/10, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
To: colet.patr...@free.fr, Ariane stolfi arianesto...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at, reduzie...@yahoo.de
Date: Saturday
On Mar 28, 2010, at 8:13 AM, cyrille henry wrote:
Matteo Sisti Sette a écrit :
Frank wrote:
It's not so much the tool, as it is the skills that makes music
sound good.
That is true for really good tools. Needless to say that Pd is one
of them.
But there are a lot of tools out there with
yep,
i've got lot's of work to do on this lib.
but no time.
the help file can work with a minor adjustement so i will not update it now.
cyrille
Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
On Mar 28, 2010, at 8:13 AM, cyrille henry wrote:
Matteo Sisti Sette a écrit :
Frank wrote:
It's not so
Matteo Sisti Sette a écrit :
Frank wrote:
It's not so much the tool, as it is the skills that makes music
sound good.
That is true for really good tools. Needless to say that Pd is one of
them.
sorry, I might going to be rude,
but I've never heard some music completely made with
--- On Thu, 4/15/10, colet.patr...@free.fr colet.patr...@free.fr wrote:
From: colet.patr...@free.fr colet.patr...@free.fr
Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?
To: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2010, 5:53 PM
Matteo Sisti Sette a écrit :
Frank wrote
pd is just a tool for learning dsp, there is no such project that show how
pd is cool to make people moving on the dance floor.
Is that what you are really expecting pd to be or sound like? Well, indeed,
I disagree Pd would be a proper tool for that. And you are really wrong to
assume pd is
In addition to disagreeing vehemently with your main point (Pd is good
for little more than experimentation), I find this a piss-poor acid test
for music that sounds good:
colet.patr...@free.fr wrote:
there is no such project that show how pd is cool to make people moving on the
dance floor.
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 17:53 +0200, colet.patr...@free.fr wrote:
Matteo Sisti Sette a écrit :
Frank wrote:
It's not so much the tool, as it is the skills that makes music
sound good.
That is true for really good tools. Needless to say that Pd is one of
them.
sorry, I might going
50 matches
Mail list logo
