No, I didn't forget... But the discussion (eg Pluggo4PD) is getting to a
point where I think wow, interesting! rather than I can help here.
Here's a few thoughts anyway. More to show what goes on in the mind of
someone who's just getting into the construction of the telescope after a
bit of star
On Feb 8, 2007, at 10:05 AM, marius schebella wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I thought we (the potential users of the database) in this phase
could brainstorm and discuss ideas on how we would like it.
I think this should be generated from the meta data in the help
files. For PDDP,
Since we are talking about trying to get as many people involved in
the documentation process as possible, it should be as
straightforward as possible for Pd people to do it. If each chunk of
meta data is a Pd selector series, where the selector defines the
type of meta data, and the
On 07/02/2007, at 3.25, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
This is something that we have discussed a lot in the PDDP
meetings. Basically, the idea is to have a [pd META] subpatch in
every help file. That subpatch would contain metadata that is each
contained in a single comment. Example
two or three other arguments to keep that main base of help/object data
outside of the pd helppatches:
when we keep all data about objects in a central database then editing
could be done online, probably with undo function, popdown menus, free
tagging would be easier, because you can query all
On 07/02/2007, at 2.25, David Powers wrote:
On 2/6/07, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And a suggestion: It might be good to debate here how the database
should be designed to best do it job. Fx. would it be an idea to make
a set of (not necessarily disjunkt/non-intersecting) categories/
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:19:08 +0100
Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought we (the potential users of the database) in this phase
could brainstorm and discuss ideas on how we would like it.
Good idea. One I thought of is to have a difficulty/level attribute.
Some examples are too hard for
On Feb 7, 2007, at 6:19 AM, Steffen wrote:
On 07/02/2007, at 2.25, David Powers wrote:
On 2/6/07, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And a suggestion: It might be good to debate here how the database
should be designed to best do it job. Fx. would it be an idea to
make
a set of (not
On Feb 8, 2007, at 5:05 AM, padawan12 wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:19:08 +0100
Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought we (the potential users of the database) in this phase
could brainstorm and discuss ideas on how we would like it.
Good idea. One I thought of is to have a
On Feb 6, 2007, at 8:25 PM, David Powers wrote:
On 2/6/07, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And a suggestion: It might be good to debate here how the database
should be designed to best do it job. Fx. would it be an idea to make
a set of (not necessarily disjunkt/non-intersecting) categories/
I am also interested. I believe that the PDDP is a good prospect for
this sort of contribution.
~Kyle
On 2/6/07, robbert van hulzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please keep us posted on this. i'd like to be one of those
non-code-interfering volunteers that write / work out documentation. and the
On 05/02/2007, at 17.12, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
apart from that:
personally i am not convinced that the database should be created
on the
fly from CVS for various reasons:
- code would have to follow a certain outline in order to make
this work
Ok. I thought that such outline was
On 2/6/07, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And a suggestion: It might be good to debate here how the database
should be designed to best do it job. Fx. would it be an idea to make
a set of (not necessarily disjunkt/non-intersecting) categories/
labels objects/libs could fit in - like math,
That is great, this is what the PDDP is all about! We are just
working on finalizing a template for help files, then it should be
quite straightforward to start work on this in a substantial way.
The next step would be to test the template out by porting some
existing help patches to
Hi list
little quesion concerning the puredatabase..
looks like it is offline and some guys are working in something new
and fresh.
What can i do in between I found the tgz file but how can i use
it ?
Thanks Luigi
___
PD-list@iem.at
Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
Hi list
little quesion concerning the puredatabase..
looks like it is offline and some guys are working in something new and
fresh.
What can i do in between
depends on what you can offer ;-)
help with database-design and -maintenance might be appreciated.
On 05/02/2007, at 15.10, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
help with database-design and -maintenance might be appreciated.
I guess a list of object and there relation can be fetched by parsing
the code in CVS. The metadata could provide some description but not
per object except for the cases
Steffen wrote:
On 05/02/2007, at 15.10, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
help with database-design and -maintenance might be appreciated.
I guess a list of object and there relation can be fetched by parsing
the code in CVS. The metadata could provide some description but not per
object
On 05/02/2007, at 16.04, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Steffen wrote:
On 05/02/2007, at 15.10, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
help with database-design and -maintenance might be appreciated.
I guess a list of object and there relation can be fetched by parsing
the code in CVS. The metadata
Steffen wrote:
I guess a list of object and there relation can be fetched by parsing
the code in CVS. The metadata could provide some description but not per
object except for the cases where an external only have one object (or
this i don't understand.
I thought that the description was
20 matches
Mail list logo
