[delread~ patch_review_buffer ???]
|
| [crickets~]
| |
[!=~]
|
| [applause~]
| |
[*~]
| \
| \
[dac~]
--- On Wed, 2/2/11, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Subject: Re: [PD] how can I clear [vd~]
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Did you add your patch to the tracker?
No, but now I did :
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3170987group_id=55736atid=478072
___
| Mathieu Bouchard tél:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-02-01 03:33, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[delwrite~] doesn't seem to have a clear feature. This could be added
with a little bit of C code, but otherwise, there is a workaround : you
temporarily set all of your read-heads to a blank portion of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was always looking for a clear feature in delay lines. One way to do
it is to use tables instead of delwrite~, and send them a clear message
; const 0. Kinda workaround though.
P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Peter Plessas wrote:
I was always looking for a clear feature in delay lines. One way to do
it is to use tables instead of delwrite~, and send them a clear message
; const 0. Kinda workaround though.
Did you see my email that contains the code to modify [delwrite~] to add
* Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca [2011-02-01 15:26]:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Peter Plessas wrote:
I was always looking for a clear feature in delay lines. One way to do
it is to use tables instead of delwrite~, and send them a clear message
; const 0. Kinda workaround though.
Did you see
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Peter Plessas wrote:
* Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca [2011-02-01 15:26]:
Did you see my email that contains the code to modify [delwrite~] to add a
'clear' method ?
Yes! I think usually Miller now would check it and see if it can be included in
pd, no?
Either that,
I actually went the easy way and doubled the [delwrite~]. After adding the
delay time to the [switch~] off message it worked just fine.
This is because I have delay times of 20 - 50 ms for doubling notes. Since
note events are not happening any faster then that it is working.
Indeed, using higher
--- On Tue, 2/1/11, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Subject: Re: [PD] how can I clear [vd~]
To: Ingo Scherzinger i...@miamiwave.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2011, 3:33 AM
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Ingo Scherzinger
wrote
a single
library or object.
Or even point me to a existing tutorial? =)
Tyler
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Tue, 2/1/11, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Subject: Re: [PD] how can I clear
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Tyler Leavitt wrote:
Thank you for writing that up Mathieu, I was looking for that exact fix
about 3 months ago. Could you or anybody else that wants to take up the
issuse explain to me how to add that code to my current installation?
I'm assuming it would need to be
You could also just build a delay using a [table] as the buffer. Then you
can clear your delay line by sending the [clear( message to the table.
.mmb
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Tyler Leavitt wrote:
Thank you for writing
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Mike Moser-Booth wrote:
You could also just build a delay using a [table] as the buffer. Then
you can clear your delay line by sending the [clear( message to the
table. .mmb
as far as I'm concerned, if I needed that feature, I'd consider just
recompiling, instead of
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Would the following do the same thing as a clear message?
If you don't need change the amount of delay while using it.
It works because [delay] doesn't keep a queue of unsent bangs, it just
forgets them, while [pipe] does make a queue (which
Oh, I agree. I'd much rather use [vd~] than hack a workaround. But I
don't think all of us are in the level of compiling our own externals
(I, for one, have never done it). I'm merely suggesting it as an
alternative.
It is a pretty simple workaround, though. If you use [poke~] to write,
then the
--- On Wed, 2/2/11, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
Subject: Re: [PD] how can I clear [vd~]
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: Ingo Scherzinger i...@miamiwave.com, pd-list@iem.at
Date: Wednesday, February 2, 2011, 6:22 AM
On Tue
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Ingo Scherzinger wrote:
Is it possible to clear the content of [vd~]?
You should ask your question like «Is it possible to clear the content of
[delwrite~] ?» because that's where the sound is kept.
[vd~] and [delread~] are just read-heads that don't keep a copy of the
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Ingo Scherzinger wrote:
Yes, you are right, Mathieu!
It's the [delwrite~]! I am already toggling between two [vd~] objects. I
guess if I'd add a second [delwrite~] to keep the other one cleard with no
signal being fed into it while the other one is active it would work.
18 matches
Mail list logo
