not checked your patch, sorry...but i guess you need [msgfile] from
the zexy library.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hallo Kyle!
Please describe this, as you just did, again in the WIKI.
I already added a little bit of technical describtion (as described by
Tim) !
LG
Georg
There already is a jack VST and Audio Unit for OSX, that's not the
issue. What I really want is to just be able to run one master app
Hallo,
Luke Iannini (pd) hat gesagt: // Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
I have converted all of my abstractions to use Memento, and I'm
following the rradical design style so that I can build complex
patches, then save their entire states. Samplers, oscillators,
sequencers, envelopes, it's all
On 3/4/07, Nikola Jeremic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is it possible to do something with a model in pd? i have it quite static
at the moment... and is there a good tutorial about [multimodel] and how to
use it? the help files is quite minimal. Is this the way to get more dynamic
models (like
hi david
i had a look at your patch, but i didn't come to a solution,
respectively i wasn't able to figure out what the problem exactly is.
however, i think, what you want to achieve could be implemented much
easier, particularly easier to read. what makes it very difficult to
read, is the deep
Ok everyone, I added an edited version of my rant to the WIKI. Please
look it over and add any details that I have missed.
Thanks for the positive feedback, this is something that I feel very
passionately about, and it looks like I'm not alone. Let's make this
the Summer of PluggoPD!
On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
hi david
i had a look at your patch, but i didn't come to a solution,
respectively i wasn't able to figure out what the problem exactly is.
In the file big.txt, the process stops before it reaches the control
mark record. I think that
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 12:11 -0500, David F. Place wrote:
On Mar 4, 2007, at 11:52 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
hi david
i had a look at your patch, but i didn't come to a solution,
respectively i wasn't able to figure out what the problem exactly is.
In the file big.txt, the process
On Mar 4, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
If you click [read big.txt( the [4( you will see something else and
that is wrong.
how can you be sure, that it is wrong? possibly your mind is
capaple of
much more, but i tend to believe, that it's a fault of the patch,
not of
pd.
Hmm, I think I should fix this... it adds an ugly layer of complication to
the list object but I think it would be inconsistent simply to refuse to
handle them. And yes, it's a bug that they currently just get passed
through without making the necessary consistency checks.
cheers
Miller
On Thu,
The growth seems to come from TK... I added a correction (g_canvas.c,
line 1051) but it looks like I'd better go adjust it again...
cheers
Miller
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 05:43:41PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 22:34 +0100, Derek Holzer wrote:
awesome, thanks for doing that guys, i wanted to get some time to do a
better writeup but just didn't have it... that writeup nails it for
me. this is definitely the #1 most needed feature for my live and
production work.
-josh
Georg Holzmann wrote:
Hallo!
Ok everyone, I added an
Hello all,
This abstraction is very nice, but computing matrices on every note is
quite expensive on the CPU, no? Perhaps it would be better to store it
in a table, let say using 60 (pd)db as a reference. The only thing is
that low and high notes are multiplied by factor much bigger than 1
and it
13 matches
Mail list logo
