Re: [PD] documentation material for Pd related grants, funds, and prizes

Yep, I would be happy to help out with this - Greg I was hoping you would bring the camera anyway. The two of us will be in touch about this, but if you (the list) can think of people to track down we might be able to find them and set up times. With the convention coming up in just a few days,

Re: [PD] pd and 64bit Linux again

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Winfried Ritsch wrote: But since one rule is, never guess, measure why, I have a quick question. Is there a profiling tool on oject or message base ? I can remember there was one in Max/FTS, so I can find out the bad objects... ? Since I reimplemented the stack overflow

Re: [PD] difference send and using msg with ;

Hallo, marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote: you mean because it would be difficult/impossible to program such a feature or because so many people are already using this.$- strings in their daily patchwork? The latter. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _

Re: [PD] pd and 64bit Linux again

Am Freitag, 17. August 2007 17:41 schrieb Miller Puckette: d'oh... no such tools in Pd. (Was there suc ha thing in Max/FTS? I don't remember it :) maybe its to long ago, but I thought in max/fts you could print out a time of operation of each object in the dsp-stack over an amount of ticks

[PD] pure data browser plugin - xml rpc external

hello list does anyone know where I can find the puredata xmlrpc external? thanks ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] strange canvas behaviour

2007/8/17, Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I wrote about this today already. This is because $ is rewritten as # instead of being rewritten as \$ as it should. The # way involves extra code that is both causing your problem and is unnecessary because \$ already gets converted to $

Re: [PD] strange canvas behaviour

Your patch work fine here on G4 macos 10.4.8 - PD 0.39.2-extended- rc3. The result of F#2 in symbol box is F#2 in canvas. Bye. Jack Le 17 août 07 à 22:23, glerm soares a écrit : strange_canvas.pd ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

[PD] pure data browser plugin

hello list still trying to compile the pd browser plugin. can anyone tell me where I can find the sources of these externals? xmlrpc external (http://iaem.at)?? - can't find it streaming external (http://iaem.at))) can't find it and for this plugin, can I use the unix sdk on a macIntel?

[PD] pure data browser plugin

found some install help on compiling pure data plugin and ran .configure: but there's also a zziplib package missing... machine$ ./configure checking whether qmake is available /configure: line 40: test: too many arguments yes checking whether zziplib is available ...Package zziplib was

[PD] audio drop-outs when resizing tables??

Hi, I am getting dsp drop-outs when I resize a table (say a size of 20 or so) if a tabread~ object exists reading from that table, even if I am not listening to the output of the tabread~. Even if the tabread~ is in a switch~ed off subpatch/abstraction. Does PD recompute the whole DSP

[PD] Re-targeting sends.

Hi all, Quick question - is there a way to set a new target object for a [send], in the same way it is possible to send a [set xyz( to a [receive~] to change its source? Thanks, robert. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] Re-targeting sends.

you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location you want to send to: [;receiver1 123( or with variables: [receiver1 123( | [;$1 $2( that will send 123 to receiver1. marius. Robert Scott wrote: Hi all, Quick question - is there a way to set a new target object for

Re: [PD] Re-targeting sends.

On Sunday 19 August 2007 02:52, marius schebella wrote: you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location you want to send to: [;receiver1 123( or with variables: [receiver1 123( [;$1 $2( that will send 123 to receiver1. marius. I'd never thought to use a $ as

Re: [PD] Re-targeting sends.

you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd 0.40 or 0.41??? frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some days ago. http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070816/a1d74535/attachment.txt marius. Robert Scott wrote: On

Re: [PD] Re-targeting sends.

I can't remember when I put it in, but send with no arguments now sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver. cheers Miller On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:37:10PM -0400, marius schebella wrote: you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd 0.40 or 0.41??? frank