On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
There's something really weird about [route] (as it is in 0.40): It will
only route selectors if I don't give any float arguments, but will only
route a list's $1 if I give any float arguments. Can anyone
patrick wrote:
hi,
i am on linux running the very last version of gem from cvs. i am trying
to find a good codec for gem. here's my basic research:
---
the best codec for quicktime is jpeg:
transcode -i yourvideo -y mov,null -F jpeg,,jpeg_quality=70
hi IOhannes,
thank you for your interest. here's the video (long life to gary burton).
http://www.workinprogress.ca/pd/gem/
i was wrong! lqtplay takes the same cpu as gem when not rendering
(pix_texture). ffplay is the best player for the quicktime jpeg with
only 16% of my cpu.
why i would
I would say it also depends on what you want to do with the video.
if you want to do scratching/forward backward, not all codecs will be
able to do that. (am I wrong?)
at least make sure that you don't use keyframes for that.
marius.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
patrick wrote:
hi,
i am on
hi,
i am on linux running the very last version of gem from cvs. i am trying
to find a good codec for gem. here's my basic research:
---
the best codec for quicktime is jpeg:
transcode -i yourvideo -y mov,null -F jpeg,,jpeg_quality=70 -o gem.mov
gem cpu
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Could you post a patch that demonstrates this? It would make it
clearer.
fmgas.dr
IOhannes
#N canvas 0 0 450 300 10;
#X obj 239 162 route 1 bla;
#X msg 235 117 list bla hu;
#X obj 231 200 bng 15 250 50 0 empty empty empty 17 7 0 10 -262144
-1 -1;
#X obj
It means that the Tcl framework version doesn't provide the same
architecture that you are building as.
Try removing those frameworks and just using the built-in ones:
rm -r /Library/Frameworks/Tcl.framework
rm -r /Library/Frameworks/Tk.framework
Or try the ones currently in use on the
On Nov 30, 2007, at 3:10 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
I agree with Martin. [route] is meant for lists,
There's something really weird about [route] (as it is in 0.40): It
will only route selectors if I don't give any float arguments, but
will
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
I agree with Martin. [route] is meant for lists,
There's something really weird about [route] (as it is in 0.40): It will only
route selectors if I don't give any float arguments, but will only route a
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
I agree with Martin. [route] is meant for lists,
There's something really weird about [route] (as it is in 0.40): It will
only route selectors if I don't give any float arguments, but will only
route a list's $1 if I give any float arguments. Can
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Chris McCormick wrote:
Which has bitten me on the ass at least once when making music with
someone who uses pd-extended. Hans, I wonder if you could make it clear
to people who download pd-extended that it is incompatible with Pd,
Yes, why is Pd still incompatible with
Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
is there an object like [islist] or
something that will tell you if the incoming message is a list?
[route list]
but that removes the list selector, so you need to add it again
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
You can add a redirect page for that translation, instead of changing
every page. basically create a new page [[XX:vanilla]] and then
add this text to that page:
#redirect [[Category:vanilla]]
.hc
On Nov 29, 2007, at 11:32 PM, PSPunch wrote:
Hans,
Problem solved.
When the
Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
got it. but it does not explain, the following:
[select 1 2 3]
has only one input. so no need to distribute anything.
The list is still distributed, but only over one
On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Martin Peach wrote:
Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Why doesn't [select 1 2 3 4] have 5 inlets and 5 outlets?
Wouldn't break old patches, but could be useful in some
circumstances.
Maybe it would make more sense if [select] accepted
On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:51 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:27:07PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 12:56 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007, at 12:36 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
yeah,
From: David Schaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi! Does anyone know if Pd can handle RPN-NRPN messages?
Sure! Pd does MIDI, and sine NRPN is really a subset of MIDI, it can be
handled...but there aren't built-in abstractions. Fortunately, I've
done the hard work for you. :)
Chris,
I tried out your FUDIKaosDS today.
After displaying the message, Connecting using WFC data...,
the LED indicating WIFI activity kept on blinking but never
proceeded.
(From the code in wifi.c I am imagining a message is expected
to show weather the attempt fails or not.)
--
I've looked
Hi! Does anyone know if Pd can handle RPN-NRPN messages? thank you!
D.S
http://www.flickr.com/photos/schafferdavid/
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
got it. but it does not explain, the following:
[select 1 2 3]
has only one input. so no need to distribute anything.
The list is still distributed, but only over one inlet now
Why doesn't [select 1 2
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
got it. but it does not explain, the following:
[select 1 2 3]
has only one input. so no need to distribute anything. then send the
message
[4 4 4 4(
no bang on the first outlet, but on the last one, but why is still only
the
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 10:22 +0100, David Schaffer wrote:
Hi! Does anyone know if Pd can handle RPN-NRPN messages? thank you!
It can with David Mccallum's excellent abstractions: [nrpnin] and
[nrpnout].
http://www.mentalfloss.ca/sintheta/html/downloads.html
Jamie
--
www.postlude.co.uk
Martin Peach wrote:
Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Why doesn't [select 1 2 3 4] have 5 inlets and 5 outlets?
Wouldn't break old patches, but could be useful in some circumstances.
Maybe it would make more sense if [select] accepted messages like [set 5 4 3
2( on its single inlet and rejected
Yeah, this works, if you want to need a ton of clicks for each
instantiation (or make abstractions with various outlet lengths, still
ugh).
Instead, wouldn't this (or something similar) do the job?
[list split 1]
| \
|\
| [output list data]
|
[select
24 matches
Mail list logo
