Has anyone had a chance to compare the Pentax K, M, or A 200/4 (non-macro)
to the old Tamron (KA-mount) 200/3.5? Any opinions?
Thanks,
Greg
Computer prizes has fallen partially because they have put more into
the same silicon area. This will not work with digital cameras. The
rest of the digital cameras is similar to the analog cameras so there
is not much to gain there.
DagT
På 10. jan. 2004 kl. 00.33 skrev Leonard Paris:
It
På 10. jan. 2004 kl. 04.29 skrev Rob Studdert:
On 9 Jan 2004 at 23:42, Dag T wrote:
I agree, the cost of high quality silicon wafers per area has been
constant for decades. More than doubling the area will increase the
prize, as well as the demand for calculating power, memory, speed etc.
It is
The raw converter lets you choose between 8bit and 16bit TIFF formats.
DagT
På 10. jan. 2004 kl. 03.36 skrev Shel Belinkoff:
Paul, CS doesn't yet support pentax RAW. Pentax uses a CCD sensor.
Like you, I wasn't too interested in the istd until the new lenses
could
readily be used. Don't know
On 10/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
The main purpose i use the preview screen on my 10D for whilst shooting
is to check for blown high lights (they flash black and white).
Review. Lest anyone gets the wrong idea ;-)
Its a great tool.
Agreed.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Jim Apilado:
What is 127.0.0.1?
localhost, i.e. the IP number of your own computer at any time.
Also called the loopback interface.
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
Leonard Paris:
Eventually, they are going to almost give the cameras away to get you
locked into their lenses. For example, look at printer prices. A good
printer can be had for not too much cash. It's the ink and paper that
they make the real money from.
On the other hand, poeople apparently
Anyone who compared it with the converter from Vuescan yet?
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 04:24, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 9 Jan 2004 at 19:58, Herb Chong wrote:
the DPreview site suggested the other way around.
A guy I know well (me) tested it and came to the the exact opposite conclusion
reached
In the3 past I only used them for Fuji Velvia, that was done OK.
On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 04:32, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
has anybody used these people for E6 or C41 processing? If so, what
are they like, please?
7Dayshop has some great prices on Royal Supra film and pre-paid
processing, which I
Heads up.
Park Cameras advertising *ist D body only at £1099 (mention Amateur
Photographer if enquiring).
www.parkcameras.co.uk
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:23:22 -0600 (Central Standard Time), Chris
Brogden wrote:
Will the off-camera flash kit Fg only work with AF flashes, or will it
work with the older MF ones (like the 280) as well?
Chris,
The 5P cable system will work with ALL flashes that work on the hotshoe
of a
Shel Belinkoff:
You really can't tell anything unless the monitors are
all calibrated to the same standard. You may be able
to fiddle around with the images and view it on different
monitors and get some sort of compromise,
Yes, it was such a compromise I was looking for.
but unless
the
Vern nice Ann. You caught that magic look where light snow clings to
trees. It doesn't last long. Perhaps it was still snowing a bit as
well? That would account for the frosty, foggy background. I also like
the way the light comes through the trees only in the center of the
shot.
On Jan 10,
John Coyle wrote:
Gentrification and 'urban renewal' are something that I have
been working with other local people to try and control in my
suburb. Many fine old 'Queenslander' houses have been
knocked down and either modern rubbish or 'Tuscan'
monstrosities have taken their place.
William Robb wrote:
That is both amazing and very sad. Who on earth would throw
away a Triumph
Bonneville, let alone two of them?
A better question is, who in their right mind would buy one
in the first
place?
I like British motorbikes, my late father used to have a Vincent Black
Bob W wrote:
has anybody used these people for E6 or C41 processing? If
so, what are they like, please?
I started using Dlab7 a couple of years ago and they now do all my E6
processing. Great prices from them as they are based in Guernsey, so small
exports attract no dreaded VAT.
For C41, I
The I.P. address of my, your, everybody's console, i.e., home.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Jim Apilado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 12:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is there an analog only Pentax list?
Unless you've been asleep for quite a while, the prices of digital
cameras has been decreasing quite nicely over time, as well.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Dag T [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 1:21 AM
To: [EMAIL
Only with Pentax, it seems.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Anders Hultman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 3:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What would you do with a 24x36 digital chip?
Leonard Paris:
I've been off the list for a while because I became tired of the digital
exchanges. Now I see that at least one other person is more interested in
film cameras than the Pentax *ist D. If all posts had something in the
subject line to identify them it would be easy to make rules for sorting
things
Yes, that's one way. You get a print, and the digital image it was made
from, and adjust the monitor until the digital image looks as much like
the print as it can. Better to save up a few bucks and get a Spyder,
though.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
Jeez, Doc, if you can get everyone to do that, we'd have a first! At
least for the PDML.
Don't tell 'em what to do! Just lead by example... At least until you
find that doesn't work, either.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
If all posts had something in the
subject line to identify
Sure, as all the initial research and new technology has been payed and
the market has opened. There is, however, a limit. Maybe it hasn´t
been reached just yet, but it´s getting close.
Anyway the APS-size cameras will always be a lot cheaper than the FF
cameras, and use cheaper optics, and
Well it looks like, at 2.74mp, i'm at the bottom of the dslr ladder and need to climb
up a
rung or two. Oh
Liz,were is the cheque book.You hid it .D'oh
(With big grin)
Dave(puny pixel)Brooks
mike wilson wrote:
About 15years ago I found two whole Triumph Bonnevilles in a
skip. As far as I know, they are still running.
That is both amazing and very sad. Who on earth would throw away a Triumph
Bonneville, let alone two of
look at the TIFF spec. you can store by bit plane as well.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: Now that the ist-D firmware has been upgraded...
It would be possible to pack the
they don't even hope. make it look good and make sure you save in sRGB color
space. i assume you are working on a calibrated monitor.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hultman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 5:49 AM
Subject: Re: Monitor
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 8:05 AM
Subject: RE: Unusual subjects to photograph.
SNIP
I have recorded the changes in my local area for
No ... looking good on your screen doesn't mean it will look good on
another screen. There are several ways to calibrate a monitor.
Probably the simplest (and least effective, but better than nothing) is
the program that comes with Photoshop, Adobe Gamma.
Another is ColorVision by Pantone. This
But that's totally backwards. You want the print to look like
what you see on the monitor. The moment you make a print
with a different profile - perhaps as a result of changing labs,
using a different paper, getting a different printer - you're back
to square one.
Len Paris wrote:
Yes,
- Original Message -
From: Len Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless you've been asleep for quite a while, the prices of digital
cameras has been decreasing quite nicely over time, as well.
Absolutely. The technology in today's Barbiecam was once horrendously
expensive.
Quite nice for Barbie,
No ... looking good on your screen doesn't
mean it will
look good on
another screen. There are several ways to calibrate a monitor.
Probably the simplest (and least effective, but better than nothing) is
the program that comes with Photoshop, Adobe
Ah Ha.
And there in lies one of my problems.
As i mentioned in a reply,i have used the Adobe Gama adjustments on the monitor,and
sometimes i
use non Canon paper.Mostly Ilford Classic Gloss or Pearl. I notice a big difference in
the
prints between
Canon and Ilford.I have to adjust curves up so
Hi!
C Okay, here's the prediction. Someone copy and paste this.
C Rough average 'going rate' on eBay for used Pentax *ist D(original), body
C only, in exc++ or mint- in January 2006:
C UK: £550
C US: $600
C Book em, Danno.
Half that figure would be a little steep. I think $200 would be a
Hi!
HC you would have to send the camera in, at least. it doesn't like there is an
HC interface to connect to, so the camera needs to be partly disassembled. i
HC would not be surprised to see a $100 charge for such an operation. for a
HC camera that costs $300 and under, i don't see that anyone
First, Dave, Adobe Gamma is only a so-so method of calibration. Yes, it's better than
nothing, but
the spyder is better yet. If you've got Adobe Gamma working properly it will make the
established
adjustments by itself. However, over time, monitors drift, and they need
recalibration at more
You're beginning to get it now, Dave ;-)) I'm sure some of the better informed list
members
will jump in and correct any of my misconceptions, but I ~think~ I've got the concept
pretty
much correct.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah Ha.
And there in lies one of my problems.
As i mentioned in a
Here are a few sites that might be helpful to those wishing to calibrate
their monitors:
http://www.colorvision.com/
http://www.jasc.com/monitor1.asp
http://epaperpress.com/monitorcal/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started about 3 years ago in my area.I'm mostly rural with
the ever present urban sprawl only a few concessions away to
my rear(southg) I started taking pictures,mostly winter BW
of farm properties,old houses and barns,old farm impliments etc.
Now that i have
I been using Adobe Gamma for a couple of years and half an hour ago decided
to use Samsung's own routine. I started 'Natural Color' and did the
adjustments. Then I followed Shel's middle link (below) and found the
results to be very good. I can distinguish all the squares and the surrounds
and
It is still an approach that can be used to set up your monitor
somewhat. It is better than no setup at all.
I have a Spyder/Printfix combo from Optical.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
Then you missed the whole $20K to $2K price drop over the last 10 years.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 7:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What would you do with a 24x36
That just means that you didn't get the printer profiles that should be
used with the paper you are using. You can web search for them and
download them or you can buy a Printfix from Optical and make your own
profiles for any paper that you want to use.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
I have never seen the screen image change when I have selected a
different paper profile. I don't believe that you have, either. The
printer profile only tells the printer what to do, not the monitor.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff
This will result in the loss of
100 homes, 29 Grade 2 listed buildings, 2 ancient monuments
and 5000 acres (7.5 square kilometres) of mostly farm and
woodland. Included in the above is a lovely Essex pub 'Three
Horseshoes', which is 560 years old. 18 months ago, I was
looking at
Len, there are still *new* cameras in the $20K range.
The price drop you claim is a misconception, IMHO. What you see now is
35mm DSLRs and compacts with the same (or better) pixel count that the
MedF/LargeF gear had 10 years ago, but it's not the same thing. Different
market, different chips,
The essential fix still to be done is the TTL flash. I'd want to use the 360FGZ flash
and the AF140C ringflash at ISOs other than 400.
Nick
Why on earth have they gone to yet another different cable release connection after
launching the MZ-S? They changed the 645NII to use that one, so why not the *ist
cameras?
Nick.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/01/04 03:33:03
To: [EMAIL
The MX with the 40mm f2.8 pancake lens makes a great rugged carry anywhere kit,
especially when combined with the dedicated ERC which adds hardly any bulk.
Nick.
I agree. You might consider prefacing the subject line of anything that is
film-only with FILM: Then you can filter out anything else.
-Original Message-
From: Dr E D F Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10-Jan-04 04:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is there an analog
Yeah, I have ... or rather, I should say I've seen the screen change with
different lab profiles as I've not yet gotten to using different paper
profiles. However, I believe I've seen changes on one of my lab's
monitors when the owner was showing me how my photo might look on
different paper
That is both amazing and very sad. Who on earth would throw away a Triumph
Bonneville, let alone two of them?
A better question is, who in their right mind would buy one in the first
place?
William Robb
My first motorcycle was a Triumph Trophy, basically a Bonneville with a
single carb. But
-Original Message-
From: Butch Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My first motorcycle was a Triumph Trophy, basically a
Bonneville with a
single carb. But I never claimed to be in a right mind :).
Still miss my 71
750 Honda.
I had a '72 750...the orginal owner was a friend of my
We could actually do this if it would make things easier for people.
Start a post with
d: for digital (including photoshop)
f: for film (including processing)
g: or nothing for general photo stuff like composition
o: for off topic
for example
d: WOOHOO! when you get
Just think what a nice package the 40mm pancake lens and the tiny *istD
would make.
On Jan 10, 2004, at 11:16 AM, Nick Clark wrote:
The MX with the 40mm f2.8 pancake lens makes a great rugged carry
anywhere kit, especially when combined with the dedicated ERC which
adds hardly any bulk.
Really? But how do people do this, generally?
Just make it look good on their own screen and hope for the best?
anders
Somewhat. However, if any of your computers has Photoshop or Elements you
can run Adobe Gamma. I have found that will give me a close enough look to
any commercial output as to
I took a workshop with Mark Klett in August 2002, and he used the Poloroid
film as his mainstay for large format BW. Results were pretty stunning.
- MCC
At 10:04 PM 1/5/2004 -0800, you wrote:
... according to a message I received earlier today.
Polaroid makes a Type 55 4x5 and Type
At 11:16 AM 1/8/2004 +1030, mapson wrote:
Just a quick info for those searching for a nice portable storage device
for their photos.
After purchasing our *istD we looked for something that would allow us to
store our images on while being on assignment. After doing some searching
we found the
I remember buying my first Intel 286-based computer for NOK 12.000 in 1991.
At that time the 286-computers were reasonably well spec'ed home computers.
The 386sx was introducing itself to the market at twice the price at that
time.
Last march, I bought my present computer. What I got was a 2,4
Nick Clark wrote:
The MX with the 40mm f2.8 pancake lens makes a great rugged
carry anywhere kit
There are a few here that carry this combination; mine lives in a coat
pocket.
Malcolm
Hi Len,
I just ran a test, and here's what I found: using the calibrated monitor
the image with the ARGB profile looked more saturated and brighter than
the lab profiles. And while the lab glossy and matte profile were very
different to tell apart from one another, using the Info tool showed
Nick Clark wrote:
Cameraworld have it at £1079.99, or £1199.99 with 18-35 FAJ lens.
It's a good bit cheaper than when I acquired one, but it's also the first
time that hasn't concerned me. It's already earned it's keep in terms of
images it's captured.
Malcolm
Shel, it's sounding better. Most of my preferred lenses are K and M.
Hell, but I do so love my KX cameras. Mebbe this can wait. None the
less, I do wonder if the changes were made, in part, because of this
absolutely nutty list. If so, thank you Pentax! I'm much more confident
of future
I've been doing this for years now. I've never seen my monitor change
when I changed printer profiles. The printer profiling software and
hardware (Printfix) has me make a print of a standard image that is
provided with the Printfix. After that, I run the printed image through
the Printfix,
You forgot
bs: for general whining about Pentax... :-)
Jostein
-
Pictures at: http://oksne.net
-
- Original Message -
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 5:53 PM
Subject:
Ah Ha.
And there in lies one of my problems.
As I mentioned in a reply,I have used the Adobe Gamma adjustments on the
monitor,and
sometimes I
use non Canon paper.Mostly Ilford Classic Gloss or Pearl. I notice a big
difference in the
prints between
Canon and Ilford.I have to adjust curves up so the
By the way. Everybody should note the change of direction here. Shel
suddenly switched venues here. He hasn't seen the changes on his
monitor. It's the lab now.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
But you definitely got your money's worth. $700 for two years is not bad
at all.
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Unusual subjects to
CT-100, my favorite slide film. Most of the folks on the list probably would not
like it. What I like about it is that it readers stuff about like I see it. Not
over saturated, not over contrasty. With good color accuracy. Like I said, I
think most of the folks here on the list would consider
At 5:08 PM + 1/10/04, Malcolm Smith wrote:
Nick Clark wrote:
The MX with the 40mm f2.8 pancake lens makes a great rugged
carry anywhere kit
There are a few here that carry this combination; mine lives in a coat
pocket.
I just picked up one of these (a week too early it seems as there are
Hi there, Len ... I just checked to be sure. I've now run three paper
profiles on my monitor, and all have a different look.
Len Paris wrote:
By the way. Everybody should note the change of direction here. Shel
suddenly switched venues here. He hasn't seen the changes on his
monitor. It's
I didn't say printer profiles. I said paper profiles.
Now ~you've~ changed the venue from paper to printer LOL
Len Paris wrote:
I've been doing this for years now. I've never seen my monitor change
when I changed printer profiles.
Yeah, I have ... or rather, I should say I've seen the
Hi ... did you expect otherwise? After all, it's a 2.8 and the 50 is a
1.4
Pentax wrote:
Also looks significantly dimmer in the
viewfinder than the 50 1.4 (only other lens I have for comparison).
Don
Hear hear hear. Phew, I was beginning to wonder !
Mind you I enjoyed the pimms thread, although, Cotty, my english memory of
pimms
is a lovely biscuit we used eat (too many of) with a nice cup of tea.
Cant find them easily over here on the west coast. Cant find decent ginger
nuts either.
Your monitor has a different look? I still don't believe it.
If you said that the prints had a different look, and you had used three
different profiles without changing paper, I could believe it. Printer
profiles only tell the printer how to compensate ink output for specific
papers. The
I suppose with all the digital usage these days, may slide projectors are
busy gathering dust.
I had an old projector bought a Boots in UK many many years ago. Well its
slide holder broke into
smithereens last month, so I started scanning for a replacement. Of course
there's a dearth of
Printer profiles are profiles that tell the printer how much of what
color ink to use to print on a specific paper to obtain the results
closest to what is in the image file itself.
Monitor profiles tell the monitor how to display the image to obtain the
most accurate display of the image so that
Anyone heard of a grip accessory for PZ-1P ? It was mentioned in a short
thread in a older user club pdml, but I never heard of this. T'would be good
to know if one exists since the trusty beast gets a little unwieldy in some
cases.
Thanks
Ian
On 10/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Cameraworld have it at £1079.99, or £1199.99 with 18-35 FAJ lens.
Thanks Nick. Cameraworld's advert doesn't include the *ist D on it's page
this week.
The Digilux 2 looks like it's going to start off at a shade under £1300,
according to Classic Cameras
I am trying to fathom the economics of producing a DSLR to sell at U.S.
$900 (the *ist Djr?). Start with the *ist D, retaining its sensor (as
Canon did), then:
Make the body plastic. Saves at most $10 per unit?
Put in a slower processor and smaller buffer. Saves a few tens of
dollars per
I have a new Pradovit Color II and a RolleiVision 66. Both are excellent
projectors. The lens on the Leitz is a ColorPlan 2,8/90 and is sharp and
bright. The picture is not as good as that from the Prado 500 I had for
years. But that lens (150 mm) was extra special although I can't remember
much
Hi!
JT I am trying to fathom the economics of producing a DSLR to sell at U.S.
JT $900 (the *ist Djr?). Start with the *ist D, retaining its sensor (as
JT Canon did), then: ... the rest snipped ...
Joseph, why don't you try to apply same logics for Canon Eos 10D and
Rebel D. Nevertheless
However, personal computers weren't new technology in '91. They were
new technology in '81. That's where you have to draw your price
comparisons.
On Jan 10, 2004, at 12:07 PM, Jostein wrote:
I remember buying my first Intel 286-based computer for NOK 12.000 in
1991.
At that time the
It's not how much money Pentax will save on the downgrading of
components. That's just a small part of it as you suggest. But if
Pentax cuts some corners and lowers their cost a bit, then prices it
below the market leaders, they can make money on volume. That's why
Ford can make money on a
Earlier Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CS doesn't support PEF
format. they are rumored to be supporting in an update...
It's a bit stronger than a rumor. A representative of Adobe said it will
be in the next update to the Raw Converter. It's expected sometime in
early 2004. This is
The PZ-1p has what is called a grip strap. Truly a
wonderful addition to the camera.
What you get is a small extension to the bottom of the
camera. No battery holder, no electronics, just the plastic
platform that attaches to the bottom. This gives you two things.
First, the addition extends
Earlier Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The main purpose i use the preview
screen on my 10D for whilst shooting is to check for blown high lights
(they flash black and white).
and Robe Studdart wrote: It's not a loss of skill, it's a new set of tools.
And I think that's the evolution.
First we
Is the *ist D made in the Philippines?
Jens, DK
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. januar 2004 19:47
Til: pdml
Emne: Economalist D?
I am trying to fathom the economics of producing a DSLR to sell at U.S.
$900 (the *ist Djr?). Start with
Pradovits are good, sturdy projectors - Elmaron is not the best lens but it should be
OK.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Ian bromehead [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Just replying to the thread in general.
There seems to be a bit of confusion on profiles, color spaces and color
management, in general. No surprise. The topic is complex and most of
what is written in the popular press doesn't help much.
Here are three resources that may help, the first two
Some might argue that the 77 limited is the poor mans 50 (75) f/1.4.
;-)
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: FS Friday: 50mm f/1.4
So that would be a 75mm lens ... kind of like
Hey gang,
Putting together a bag for my ist D (this may be interesting to
those with film vivitar lenses), and was trying out various lenses.
Trying to put on my Vivitar Series 1 90-180mm Flat Field, I found the
flange at the back of the lens to be too long.
I know someone had cut
Cotty,
Can you do something about this?
I'm really bummed about the Three Horseshoes going!
Next time I visit Essex, where will I go for a pint or two?
Lord Hanningfield, Leader of Essex County Council has
criticised [the most recent] proposal to develop a new runway at
Stansted Airport as
not having read it myself from someone at Adobe, i wasn't going to commit.
anyway, with the converter in CS, there isn't a lot of use for the Pentax
software for me, which i am glad. it is pretty marginal in usability. the
only significant advantage of the Pentax software is that it shows more of
i use a 4G card and consider 283 images too few.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: Now that the ist-D firmware has been upgraded...
In any case, I don't believe RAW file size
Lasse Karlsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The K18/3.5 has a few built-in filters, as i imagine a few other lenses
have as well. One is a cloudy filter. OK, I'm ignorant: what does a
cloudy filter do?
Direct quote from
ASAHI PENTAX FILTERS [Printed in
That $20K camera (AP2000) was only 2mp , so the dropped has been more than that,
Len. But your point is still valid.
Len Paris wrote:
Then you missed the whole $20K to $2K price drop over the last 10 years.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com
You might as well accept people as they are,
you
Speaking of Vivitar Series 1 lenses, I have a 70-210mm f3.5 with fungus on
the front group. I sent it to an outfit in Colorado that advertises lens
repair in Shutterbug. They quoted $75 for the front group, and $125 for
cleaning the entire barrel(where they found more) and recoating. Three
I'm trying to decide whether to make the 645NII or the *ist-D this year's main
purchase, so I've got a couple of questions I'm sure the experts here can help me
with.
I take pictures entirely for pleasure, and enter Camera Club competitions and a few
magazine competitions (the latter without
Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your preference in 35mm is a focal length around 85mm, then both the
150mm are nice. The A version is f/3.5, while the new FA is f/2.8.
If your preference in 35mm is a little longer, 100-135mm, then maybe the A
or FA 200mm will suit you better. Both lenses
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
