Rebekah Gonzalez wrote:
Do you happen to have a photo of that boat you saw? It does sound
interesting.
I didn't take a photo. There was nowhere near enough light available.
All that is visible under the building is a small section of the hull.
Most of the boat was either destroyed or
Neat Image can't work miracles (particularly in the case of 3200ISO shadow
noise) however it does quite a good job when used with custom noise profiles.
At the link below are a copy of my current custom noise profiles for the *ist
D, they aren't perfect but they seem to get the job done nicely.
Has anyone performed tests on TC/tube combos for macro use? If you were using
tubes and a TC would you put the TC or tubes directly behind the lens?
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12 Jan 2004 at 21:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob,
Wow, that depth of field is really short. You can see a sharp line of focus
below across the brick face, on the legs, and on the leading edge of the wing.
Amazing what parts are in and out of focus...
It is isn't it :-)
I've made
Doug Franklin wrote:
Sorry, Ann,
That was a reference to an old stand up comedian's routine.
Doug - I was taking off on Rebekka's tag line as a
way to say for
ducks it would be nicer to shoot without bright
sun --
So no need to apologize to me - you were just
coming up with
exactly what
I have never done that but my brain tells me to put TC between extension
tube and the lens. However, the Pentax TC manual mentions they were not
designed for macro works.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Has anyone performed tests on TC/tube combos for macro use? If you were
Hi!
I have never done that but my brain tells me to put TC between
extension tube and the lens. However, the Pentax TC manual mentions
they were not designed for macro works.
I second that. The TC (I have MC) I think is/was? constructed
specially for the lens to be attached right to it. So
Hi!
I am about to be enabled with the above lens (SMC M 50/2.0). It is
optically identical to A 50/2.0 and very similar (AFAICT) to 50/1.7. I
wonder how come Stan's site has nothing to say about it and except one
line on Alex's site I couldn't find anything in regular PDML annals
g...
Hi Boris,
I think it is because it used to be the standard bundled lens for many of
the old camera. I have seen many of them going very cheap and have played
with one. It is just other 50mm lenses. But I have not seen any pictures
taken with it though...
Andy
-Original Message-
From:
Hi People
Back after 3 months.
What's happening?
Is there a D*st 2 yet?
Are they bringing back the LX?
Clive
Antibes
France
cameras with Bayer pattern sensors have a little less resolution than
cameras without. since the Leaf back uses the same arrangement as the
Foveon, the back should deliver resolution about equal to a 8-10 megapixel
digital camera that is using a
Bayer pattern.
Herb
- Original Message
På 13. jan. 2004 kl. 11.42 skrev Boris Liberman:
Hi!
I have never done that but my brain tells me to put TC between
extension tube and the lens. However, the Pentax TC manual mentions
they were not designed for macro works.
I second that. The TC (I have MC) I think is/was? constructed
Thanks, John.
Very interesting.
Jostein
Quoting John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
John, (or Rob or anyone...)
This may be a stupid question, but is the relationship between lp/mm and
sensors as straightforward as two adjacent sensors equal to one line
pair,
irrespective of sensor
William Robb wrote:
With digital capture, there is no resolution loss when subject contrast
drops, unlike film..
John Francis wrote:
In real life, of course, most patterns are lower-contrast
than all black/all white, so deliver lower than theoretical
maximum resolution. But they tend to be
Rob, John Shaw in Closeups in Nature says to put the TC on the camera
body, the tubes in front of it and the lens in front of that. This way you
multiply your extension, thereby allowing you to focus closer and increase
your magnification.
If you put the tubes on the body and the TC in front of
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Wondering how far back you consider old to be :)
Anything before the launch of the *ist D, is sooo last century hides ;-)
Malcolm
Thanks Greg,
I've looked around and there were none available a few weeks ago. I noticed right
away, the need for this grip upon getting my PZ1p.
-Original Message-
From: greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where can
Bob W wrote:
The nearest plague pit to me that I know of is in Deptford,
about 1.5 miles away in the church of St. Nicholas. The great
Christopher Marlowe was thrown into the pit after he was
murdered, and remains there to this day. People are not
inclined to open plague pits.
Which is
Cotty wrote:
Interestingly, I haven't seen many for sale. Not in dealers'
ads in AP, nor on eBay. I think most people buying these
cameras have considered the facts and are not going to
stomach the heavy loss in selling used. If you've bought a
D60 for £1600 (me) then you're (me) hardly
Hi Boris,
It is optically identical to A 50/2.0
I'm not sure if this means you'd also be interested in hearing about the A
50/2.0, but just in case it does, here's one non-pro's experience:
I started with the A 50/2.0, then went to an A 50/1.7. I did a roll of
(informal, non-chart) test shots
I've done it both ways shooting some jewelry a few years ago.
You can get almost 1:1 with the three tubes between the lens and t/c.
Macro lenses are intended for just that. Regular lenses aren't designed
for such constraints. But they can suffice.
Tubes are really nothing different from the long
On 13 Jan 2004 at 7:09, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
Tubes are really nothing different from the long helicoid of a macro lens.
The difference is, as always, in the glass. Anything wider than 50mm
may give some curvature that's unappealing, to say the least.
Hi Collin,
Thanks for the
On 12 Jan 2004 at 19:01, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Burnt out whites, it isn't properly focused?
The whites are burnt out, unfortunately it was a grab shot as I mentioned, I
used auto-exposure and even then I only got 5 shots in before it was off. (Damn
I could have used that yet to be implemented
Hi!
Thanks for the suggestions (and thanks too to the other listers who
responded).
'Pleasure g...
Try some shots look @ the results. You may well be pleased with
what you see.
I think that's what I'll be up to tomorrow eve.
Rob, I do hope you'd post the results. Then film photogs g would
Hi,
People are not
inclined to open plague pits.
Which is why there is so much open space still in Blackheath.
a popular misconception, it seems. The name Blackheath predates the
Black Death and is apparently derived from the word 'bleak', which it
certainly can be.
Even if there were
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Boris Liberman wrote:
I am about to be enabled with the above lens (SMC M 50/2.0). It is
optically identical to A 50/2.0 and very similar (AFAICT) to 50/1.7. I
wonder how come Stan's site has nothing to say about it and except one
line on Alex's site I couldn't find
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 11:57, Clive evans wrote:
Is there a D*st 2 yet?
Clive
Antibes
France
Yes, there is a firmware update you can download and install.
--
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks very much. I think I lean towards
Kodak, and the more information I
get on it, the more I like it. Meet? I heard there is a national meet
somewhere, sometime, but I don't know anything about it. Maybe you could
tell me about it, please?
Hi!
Kostas (and others), a bit of clarification. I have FA 50/1.7 lens
that I bought new along with ZX-L and Sigma zoom. However I want to
have more than one normal lens. I think that mostly I will keep FA 50
attached *all the time* to ZX-L and M 50/2.0 will be used on ME Super
along with
My first Pentax was a MX with the M-50/1.7 because it was cheaper than the
50/1.4. I had it for almost 20 years. Two years ago I sold my M-50/1.7 and
buyed a used M-50/1.4 . It gives - in my eyes - a nicer rendition than the
M-50/1.7 which seems to be quite scientific. Some time ago I purcheased
Well, I have to go along with this too, if you can afford it. I have 4
50/1.4's and use any of them more than my 50/2's and 1.7's combined. The
M50/1.4 does make a wonderful combo with the ME Super, though I also like
the K50/1.4. The M is probably easier to find and should cost a bit less.
Ok cool, thanks a bunch. I knew there was something that I needed to know
for that, any hints on what kind of film you would use? I think I will buy
the kodak eg100 as somebody earlier told me it was well saturated but not
too slow. Although, that's not really a worry since it is so bright out.
Actually, I also enjoy Kodachrome 64 as it was the predominant film my
father used to use, and he turns out such beautiful slides that I also have
an appreciation for it. In fact, it was the first roll of film I used in my
new Pentax, and I am still waiting for the slides to come back. Oh the
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you might see a sell off if Pentax came out with a reasonably
priced ($2000) FF DSLR.
And if my granny had wheels she'd be a trolley...
I doubt, however, that I would dump my *istD for an 8 mp APS sensor
successor quickly unless it was $1000.
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I doubt, however, that I would dump my *istD
for an 8 mp APS sensor successor quickly unless it was $1000.
If such a camera came out the *ist D would probably be worth $500 or
less. At that point I would probably keep it as a second body.
I'm
William Robb wrote:
With digital capture, there is no resolution loss when subject contrast
drops, unlike film..
John Francis wrote:
In real life, of course, most patterns are lower-contrast
than all black/all white, so deliver lower than theoretical
maximum resolution. But they
alex wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I doubt, however, that I would dump my *istD
for an 8 mp APS sensor successor quickly unless it was $1000.
If such a camera came out the *ist D would probably be worth $500 or
less. At that point I would
I have an example of the M version of the1.7 lens, and in my searches, I
find the performance exceptional!
Test reports give it a resolution of 98 line pairs per mm at f/8.0, and
87 line pairs at plus or minus 2 stops either side of f/8.0!
That's sharp! -- I'm keeping mine!
If they made it today,
Hi,
Kodachrome 64 is lovely film, I think. I use it for most of my colour
photography other than family friends snaps.
Here's one I don't think I've shown here before. One of my recurrent
themes is people reading; this is a nun in a monastery garden in
Northern Romania:
One other thing to consider for us current owners:
I would really like a backup DSLR at some point. If/when a better
body is released, I would be more inclined to keep the *istD as the
backup and then purchase the new body, rather than unload the old
body.
Also, there would need to be a
That's a really beautiful picture.
Rebekah
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: Chromes,was: Hi there
Hi,
Kodachrome 64 is lovely film, I think. I use it for most of my colour
photography other
It will be interesting to see if APS DSLRs ever move up to 8 or more
megapixels. I don't know that the increase in pixel count on the same
size sensor would give enough improvement in image quality to be worth
the additional storage space (larger buffer in camera, more and bigger
CF cards,
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other thing to consider for us current owners:
I would really like a backup DSLR at some point. If/when a better
body is released, I would be more inclined to keep the *istD as the
backup and then purchase the new body, rather than unload the old
body.
I always shot print film so I'm the wrong guy to ask. For print film,
you worry more about shadow detail since there are features of the
development process the inhibits the highlights from washing out. For
slides, you worry more about, i.e., expose for, the highlights. I
happened to remember
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will be interesting to see if APS DSLRs ever move up to 8 or more
megapixels. I don't know that the increase in pixel count on the same
size sensor would give enough improvement in image quality to be worth
the additional storage space (larger buffer
I want to ask veterans of Pentax movement g this question - when
MZ-S came out and started to receive favorable reviews - how many
PZ-1(p) owners started to unload their cameras in order to buy the
newest one? Please understand this question correctly - I do not
intend to cause a shift
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Keith Whaley wrote:
If they made it today, and advertised it for one of the top dog
performers, you'd have to pay $500 and up for it.
Why, is it that different to the $230-150 FA50/1.7?
Kostas
But I don't really want to shoot faster, so this is a moot point for me.
As an example, the Nikon D2H doesn't tempt me at all, although I think
the D1X is neat. I also suspect that the Baby D won't be built quite as
well as the *ist D. I actually think the final real street price of the
*istD
Thanks goodness. I was afraid to ask someone what latitude mean, but
fortunately you have supplied the information, and it all makes a lot of
sense. Today I have half a roll of Kodak Elite, and then I want to use a
print film because I am rather impatient, and also I believe there's nothing
quite
There are two items I'd add to the list:
1 - fix the TTL flash exposure bug (or has this been fixed?)
2 - add a menu option to make a small (640x360 or even 320x180) copy of an Raw image
(or large jpg) onto the CF. I can then pop the CF in a PDA and email it via a mobile
phone. Postcards from
Since all DSLRs so far have had a short shelf life
due to technical innovations, could someone please
explain to me why build quality is important?
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
Frank wrote:
There's still lots of Goth places around Queen and Bathurst. It would be fun
to go down around there some night and shoot some of them. I do like bw
film and they'd look best in bw...
Thanks for the idea, Pat! g
Go for it, Frank! As it happens, I got 3 rolls of Kodak bw film
Hi!
None of the proposed IMHO covers it.
Perhaps, they reckoned that producing attractive enough a camera they
would convince enough Pentax users to buy it. Then of course the
prices would drop. Then they would produce their upgrade and even more
people would buy it and prices might as well go
Correction.
It is 3 I would vote for. Typo.
Boris
Hi!
JF That's not a lot of good when I'm 400 miles from home, and my camera
JF is about 20' away from me on a bracket (and somewhere where I'm not
JF allowed to stand). I'm just looking for a remote equivalent of the
JF LCD screen on the back of the camera, which is perfectly good enough
JF for
Hi!
RG Israel is rainy? Somehow I kinda got the idea it was dry - is the rain a
RG seasonal thing? What part of Israel are in? Thanks for the welcome.
RG Rebekah
RG a day without sunshine is like, you know, night.
To rephrase your signature, Rebekah, A day without sunshine is like,
you know, a
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Keith Whaley wrote:
If they made it today, and advertised it for one of the top dog
performers, you'd have to pay $500 and up for it.
Why, is it that different to the $230-150 FA50/1.7?
Gee, I don't know, Kostas.
Is the FA offered
Why should build quality *not* be important? The shelf life, as you call it,
by which I presume you mean useful life, is as long as the build quality
allows it to be. Simply because there's something out there that is considered
more modern technology doesn't mean that an existing camera has
Not everyone feels the need to replace a perfectly good camera every time
a better one comes out.
chris
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Since all DSLRs so far have had a short shelf life
due to technical innovations, could someone please
explain to me why build quality is
Hello,
So far I was mainly silent reader of PDML, and, after reading some nice
reviews here, I bought SMC-M 24-35 1:3.5 lens. Now I have to sell it :-( (I
bought FA 24-90). Here is the link to eBay auction:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2978833604
Auction ends Jan-19-04.
If
I seriously doubt that firmware 1.1 will drive the *ist D prices back
up. The real question is why they dropped full compatibility in the
first place. The current fix is fine, but the mechical aperature
coupler seems like a small feautre on an expensive camera. Why drop it?
Steven
The M50 2.0 came with my MX when I bought it in 1980, and I used it without
any complaints for many years. If you can get it for a good price, why not
buy it? I don't think you'll be tying up hundreds of dollars.
As Shel said,
Don't get caught up in minutia and data about optics. Make
So far I was mainly silent reader of PDML, and, after reading some nice
reviews here, I bought SMC-M 24-35 1:3.5 lens. Now I have to sell it :-(
(I
bought FA 24-90). Here is the link to eBay auction:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2978833604
Auction ends Jan-19-04.
If a
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Since all DSLRs so far have had a short shelf life
due to technical innovations, could someone please
explain to me why build quality is important?
Just because a camera is only sold for a short period of time doesn't
mean that it has a short
My best guess is that it's a consequence of choosing to base the camera
on the *ist body instead of the MZ-series. The latter choice would have
led to the MZ-D, for which Pentax couldn't see a big enough market.
S
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I seriously doubt that firmware 1.1 will drive the
alex wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Since all DSLRs so far have had a short shelf life
due to technical innovations, could someone please
explain to me why build quality is important?
Just because a camera is only sold for a short period of time
Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
It'd be nice, if you posted this auction also on the Polish Pentax Users
Mailing List, don't you think, Jarek? :-)
I am too shy ;-)...
Well, I have never seen an ad on Polish List that comes from eBay auction.
I didn't want to make a garbage there, but now... after your
Hi gang,
Can anyone recommend a photography-related web site that offers a mobile
edition so I can load it as a channel on AvantGo on my Palm for reading
in those quiet moments when I'm sat draped over a chair sipping mugs of
tea waiting for something to happen in a boring court case?
In fact,
Hi Guys
What's the best/cheepest way to empty your memory cards on the go?
Alle the best
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. januar 2004 19:42
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Used DSLR prices
- Original Message -
From: Cotty
Hi Guys
In the RA-4 process under or over replenishment of P-2 bleach/fix will show
up how on the control strip?
Thanks
Butch
I don't know about other backs, but the Leaf Volare produces a 2048 x
3072pixel image - or ~ 6.3 megapixel.
It probably can withstand upsampling much better than a shot made with a
camera that uses a Bayer pattern sensor.
- MCC
At 06:24 AM 1/13/2004 -0500, you wrote:
cameras with Bayer
Hi, Boris,
I have one, and use it often. It's the only 50mm prime k-mount that I have,
and I tend to throw it in my pocket when I'm walking around with a slow zoom
on a body, just in case I need it for lower light shots.
It's fine stopped down:
http://pug.komkon.org/03mar/filter.html
I know
Some ducks a few weeks ago
A*300f4 lens LX Kodak max 800
How am I doing?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1978092
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1978107
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2049070
Last shot with a smc 17f4 fisheye
JD
Actually the leaf should be an 18 meg as you are making 3 separate exposures
of 6 megs each as opposed to a single shot chip that uses the Bayer
interpolation to interpolate to 6 mp.
Butch
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
At 12:20 AM 14/01/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Guys
What's the best/cheepest way to empty your memory cards on the go?
Alle the best
Jens
We equipped ourselves with an X-drive. Nice toy, so far worked faultlessly.
Comes with mains and car cigarette lighter chargers.
I believe they released a PRO
Just dug into the box my A* 200 f4 macro came in and found a manual
entitled Pentax 35mm Interchangeable Lenses. It is not specific to the
200 f4 - it covers all A and A* lenses, plus a few K lenses (like the 500
f4.5 and reflex zoom 400-600, etc). There are a couple of pages devoted to
the
At 12:20 AM 14/01/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Guys
What's the best/cheepest way to empty your memory cards on the go?
Alle the best
Jens
a follow-up to my previous mail.
I just noticed that only have the PRO version now. A few days ago they
still had the one we got.
If anyone is interested in
Format
Seriously, though, that depends on your equipment. Some of the Lexar cards
come with readers, so that's pretty cheap. The bad part is that only the pricy
Lexar ccards come with the readers, and only Lexar cards work with the reader.
However, I got a cheap little generic reader that
Boris
That was the lens that prompted me back to primes. Maybe not quite as good
as the 1.4 or 1.7 but a very decent lens. I haven't compared mine against my
1.4 or 1.7 though.
Butch
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
Y'know, Frank brings up a good point. Talking about the quality of a lens is like
describing sex. Everyone's experience is their own -
there are so many variables in what makes the final print or slide or web shot or
Photoshop manipulation. And then there's the language
... what is sharp to
Right, Shel,
That was ~exactly~ the point I was sort of trying to make (but didn't
really, did I?).
At the price these things go for, anyone can afford to buy it and use it, to
make up their own minds. It's not like going out and buying a $2000 Leica
Noctilux or something...
-frank
The
Great info, Fred. Based on this chart, if my old eyes are working
correctly, that M50/2.0 is one of the sharpest 50mm Pentax lenses around
once you get off of wide open a bit. Now all those nay sayers and chart
huggers are gonna regret having parted with theirs ... LOL but I've
still got mine.
some scanners, particularly the ones that use LEDs for their illumination,
do a terrible job of scanning Kodachrome.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Rebekah Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: Chromes,was: Hi there
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Old Pentium (I) PCs may still work too, but
that doesnt mean I would still want to use
them.
ugggh! - I wouldn't have wanted too have to use one
of those even when they were cutting edge
;^D Bill
It sounds like my A 50/2.0 is at best a bad sample, and more likely
defective or damaged. There is no sign of damage on the body, and the
glass looks great. Maybe a previous owner opened it up and put it back
together wrong. My ignorant, wild guess is that maybe it just doesn't
focus right, and
you mean aside from sucking down reviews from www.dpreview.com? they seem to
be enabled for electronic subscription of some kind if you have the right
software.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004
the Leaf back's points are all at the same position, so there are only 6
million points. a camera using the Bayer pattern has an antialiasing filter,
commonly known as blurring, followed by interpolation. the filter causes
most of the resolution loss. interpolation has no resolution loss. its job
A lot of professional photogs in days gone by (and perhaps to this day)
would, when buying a lens, get a half dozen or so samples to test and
then choose the one that suited them best. This is a highly recommended
procedure, but, since so many people are buying mail order and over the
internet in
Does anyone know if the A*200/4 Macro came with a specific manual
if so I'd like to obtain a copy by any means, the Pentax manuals
library has nothing specific.
Rob, when I originally picked up my A* 200/4 Macro (new - rather
unusual for me - g), it did not have a specific manual, but just a
Hi John -
Since you asked -
Good color focus. I find the clump of shoreline distracting. A polarizer
would most likely have darkened the water and possibly have highlighted the
duck more. I miss seeing the ducks eye.
Was this taken at Clove lake?
I use to visit Staten Island alot when I lived in
Hi Mark, I was looking for the same info. Would you send copy my way also?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: A*200/4 Macro manual?
Just dug into the box my A* 200 f4 macro came in and found a manual
entitled
Thanks Robert
X-drive seems to be the thing for me.
Thanks
JEns
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: mapson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. januar 2004 00:59
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Mobile Card Reader and Disk
At 12:20 AM 14/01/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Guys
What's the
I just realized I totally misapprehended your meaning. DUH.
Quoting myself:
Format
Seriously, though, that depends on your equipment. Some of the Lexar cards
come with readers, so that's pretty cheap. The bad part is that only the
pricy
Lexar ccards come with the readers, and only
I am starting a photography group/club at the high school where I teach
this semester.
Was wondering if anyone has m42 equipment they don't want to go through the
Ebay hassle with
but want it to find a good home. Doesn't have to be our beloved brand,
maybe you got a Petri or Yashica or Chinon
Yaeh, that's right. I don't wnat to bring a laptop along - just the storing
media. But thanks anyway.
Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. januar 2004 02:30
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Mobile Card Reader and Disk
I just
Hi Robert
I used your link and found the X-drive (Vosonic) in Great Britain - 189 ? -
that's not to bad. App. the same as a 1 GB card! 2 days delivery!
Best Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: mapson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. januar 2004 00:55
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne:
Tom - I couldn't have said it better.Your notes are a great help to me. I'm
mentoring a young photographer and you notes pull together many basics that
apply to general photography.
Thanks for sharing.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TC
At 02:32 AM 14/01/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Robert
I used your link and found the X-drive (Vosonic) in Great Britain - 189 ? -
that's not to bad. App. the same as a 1 GB card!
I know, that's why we invested in an X-drive and 2x 256Mb cards. It takes a
few minutes to copy a card of this size. With
One word : PHOTOSHOP!
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert
I just returned from a trip to GFM and thought I'd share this one with you.
It was taken about 50 feet from the entrance to the picnic area where
camping is permitted during the Nature Photo Weekend.
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=60
Bill
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
